By Jared Chausow
By Katie Toth
By Elizabeth Flock
By Albert Samaha
By Anna Merlan
By Jon Campbell
By Jon Campbell
By Albert Samaha
These politicians are less in the mold of Nelson Rockefeller, the most famous of the moderate Republicans, than of Christine Todd Whitman, New Jersey's governor. The moderates are fiscal conservatives. Nothing makes them happier than a tax cut. But they are liberal on social and cultural issues, often pro-choice and eschewing the antiabortion positions of right-wing hard-liners. And they can be maddeningly quixotic, like Specter, who picks up an issue like the rise of the militia movement only to drop it; or opportunistic, like Stevens, an ace at winning pork barrel projects for Alaska.
Of the moderates, the two women senators from Maine are probably the most important, and Snowe, now the senior senator, reckons to become a major power. Maine has close ties to Clinton with another former Republican moderate, William Cohen, a former Maine senator, sitting as Secretary of Defense. Former Democratic Senate majority leader George Mitchell, yet another Mainer, has acted as a Clinton emissary to Northern Ireland.
With conservative Southern Democrats going Republican in droves during the 1990s, Clinton played up to these moderates, pushing tax cuts and write-offs and government privatization. He currently is stressing education, a favorite moderate GOP topic, and gives lip service to environmentalism, another plank in their platform dating back to hero Teddy Roosevelt. Clinton's speeches and announcements on education and tax deductions so far this year are replete with moderate Republican thinking. Indeed, Democrats in Congress long have fumed that the president is more of a Republican than a traditional Democrat. Last week, Mitchell, a former prosecutor and federal judge who now works for the same law firm as Bob Dole, publicly defended Clinton as the Senate trial got under way. Mitchell stands as surely the most impressive advocate for the president in Washington, and, were he to become actively involved in support of Clinton, the entire tone of the president's defense could change.
Virginia to Rudy: Up Yours
With a scream, the entire state government of Virginia has risen up in anger against New York City and its mayor. Last week, Giuliani said Virginia ought to get over its "knee-jerk" aversion to taking Big Apple garbage.
"The mayor is out of line," Virginia governor James S. Gilmore III retorted. The governor's comments came on the heels of press reports that Waste Management, the big garbage company, had signed contracts allowing it to substantially increase the amount of garbage imported into Virginia from New York and elsewhere.
"Now let me see if I have this right," drawled Virginia state senator William T. Bolling. "We go to New York City and we pay our hard-earned money to get there. We pay our hard-earned money to buy goods in their shops and food in their restaurants. We spend our hard-earned money to attend plays on Broadway. Yet somehow, we have to reciprocate for those pleasures by accepting their trash."
"The people of Virginia should be outraged by the arrogance that obviously exists at the highest levels of government in New York City," he continued. "Mr. Mayor, listen closely . . . Make no mistake about it. We will not stand idly by and allow the Commonwealth of Virginia to become a dumping ground for New York City and New York State."
Dems Disappear from Social Security Debate
Under cover of impeachment, the right's battle to eliminate Social Security moves forward across a broad front with a clueless Democratic party on the defense. The main proposal in Congress is a bill based on the work of the National Commission on Retirement Policy, sponsored in the Senate by Judd Gregg, the New Hampshire Republican, and John Breaux, the Democrat from Louisiana. In the House it is backed by a so-called blue dog (conservative) Democrat, Charlie Stenholm from Kentucky, and Jim Kolbe, Republican from Arizona. This bill diverts money into private IRA-type accounts, which reduces the overall size of the trust fund, exacerbating its shortfall and forcing a reduction by nearly one-quarter of disability and survivors' benefits to spouses and dependents.
The most aggressive attack on this legislation comes not from liberals but from the libertarian right, which believes it muddles the debate and makes the Republicans look like skinflints by cutting benefits to the elderly. As a result, Texas senator Phil Gramm is pushing an alternative designed by Martin Feldstein, a Harvard economist and former chairman of Reagan's Council of Economic Advisors. This is a scarcely believable scheme that would raise Social Security retirement income with no tax increases. Reminiscent of the supply-side euphoria under Reagan's OMB director, David Stockman, this plan would be financed by supposed future budget surpluses. Unfortunately, the size of these surpluses, if there are any, is unknown, and there are other claims on them. When they disappear, there would be more taxes, or, more likely, more cuts in existing programs, chiefly medicare. So, at base, the Feldstein plan is a skillful time bomb to gut not only Social Security but what little remains of publicly financed medical insurance as well.