By Jared Chausow
By Katie Toth
By Elizabeth Flock
By Albert Samaha
By Anna Merlan
By Jon Campbell
By Jon Campbell
By Albert Samaha
Gloating though they may be over what looks like the conquest of the Republican right in impeachment, Clinton's embattled supporters have little to look forward to. The Democrats are deeply divided in Congress, with much of the party gearing up to fight Clinton on both trade and social issues. The "impeachment campaign" may well help the Democrats regain control of the House. But this would be a victory tinged with irony.
Clinton faces strong opposition to his free-trade policies among Democrats clustered around House Minority Whip David Bonior. And members of this same group have thrown down the gauntlet on the president's plan to tie Social Security to the stock market.
In the end, a Clinton "victory" on impeachment may not mean much. That's because since his election in 1992 Clinton has methodically set out to break up the New Deal. He has left the Democratic Party a mangled wreck, its base consisting largely of:
Liberals, who sided with Clinton even when he dumped welfare.
Unions, whose weak leadership will do anything to stay in Clinton's good graces but whose rank and file oppose his economic policies.
Women's groups, badly damaged by a president who has supported their issues but whose personal treatment of women has been demeaning.
African Americans, who have cheered on Clinton even in the face of his destructive social-welfare policies.
The basic issue facing Democrats remains intractable: how to redistribute a modicum of wealth from the suburbs and the upper middle class to the poor and the working class. After six years of Clinton, the social divide is more stark than ever.
Arkansas Scandal Tied to Clinton Spreads
The scandal involving sales of diseased blood from Arkansas prisons while Bill Clinton was governor spread last week as a group of desperately ill Canadians announced they would hold a press conference in Washington, D.C., on Wednesday, February 24.
"When this case first came to light some 15-plus years ago," a White House spokesman said on Canadian TV last week, "there was no testing being done to detect the AIDS virus. It is impossible to say that the president knew [the danger]. The accusations that President Clinton knew the blood was tainted are wrong."
The international imbroglio has its roots in a program to sell prison blood, which was started two decades ago in Arkansas. In the early '80s, Clinton's administration awarded a contract for prison medical services to Health Management Associates, a company set up by Francis Henderson, an Arkansas doctor. Later, Leonard Dunn, a friend of Clinton's and a campaign fundraiser, became CEO.
Until then, the Arkansas prisons, as well as prisons in other southern states, had been making a profit selling inmate blood. But in 1982 a glutted blood market crashed, threatening the program. "I called all over the world," Henderson subsequently told state police investigators, "and finally got one group in Canada who would take the contract."
The "group" was Continental Pharma Cryosan Ltd., a Canadian company notorious in the blood trade for practices such as importing blood from Russian cadavers and relabeling it as Swedish. Cryosan never checked out the plasma-collecting centers in the U.S. from which it obtained blood, depending instead on the licensing procedures of the Food and Drug Administration. The FDA's procedures were also lax.
Little was known about AIDS during this period, and Cryosan president Thomas Hecht said there was a "strong feeling" that prison plasma was safer than that taken from the population at large. This is hard to believe. Here's how a former inmate, appearing on the Canadian TV program The Fifth Estate, described giving blood: "Have sex in the fields on your way going to the plasma, you know, anybody in the dormitory, going to take a quick bath, run and have sex in the showers, then go to plasma. Go shoot up and go to plasma."
In Canada, the tainted blood was turned into clotting factor and sold to the Red Cross. When in 1983 Canadian officals discovered the source of the blood, they canceled the contracts. An international recall followed blood from Arkansas had gone to Europe and Japan, and in at least one instance was sent back to the U.S. but it was too late. By then, most of the blood that had been sent to Canada had been used by hemophiliacs.
Unfortunately, the recall didn't stop HMA's prison blood business, which continued until 1994. According to one prison subcontractor, officials knew that hepatitis was rife in the '70s, and by 1980 were concerned about a "killer" hepatitis, which became known as hepatitis C. In 1985, there were press reports about AIDS in the prisons. That same year a group of inmates filed suit in federal district court to require AIDS testing.
In 1986, Clinton called for an investigation of HMA after it was accused of negligent care. The investigation eventually cleared HMA of criminal wrongdoing, but a second inquiry, by an independent California firm, concluded that HMA had violated its contract in 40 areas, and put much of the responsibility for its poor performance on state prisons chief Art Lockhart. Asked by reporters whether Lockhart should resign, Clinton said, "No. I do not think that at this time I should ask Mr. Lockhart to resign."