By Jared Chausow
By Katie Toth
By Elizabeth Flock
By Albert Samaha
By Anna Merlan
By Jon Campbell
By Jon Campbell
By Albert Samaha
As the new millennium dawns, the omniscient eye fixes its gaze towards Earth. The eye, as in Foucault's treatment of the Panopticon, holds power over us: watched without seeing our watcher, we internalize rules, assuming our actions will constantly be seen. But is anyone watching the watcher?
Last month, Space Imaging (spaceimaging.com), a Denver-based, privately held "information company," attempted a launch of its spy satellite, Ikonos I, from California's Vandenberg Air Force Base. Heralded as the first commercial high-resolution imaging satellite to be hurled into space, Ikonos I never completed its journey. Athena II, its launch vehicle, was blamed. The satellitebuilt in part by Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, and Kodakplummeted somewhere into the South Pacific. Space Imaging plans to send off Ikonos I's twin, Ikonos II, by the end of the year. And with 12 companies licensed by the Department of Commerce to launch the new breed of spy cams, it's only a matter of time before these private eyes proliferate in the sky.
The burgeoning billion-dollar spy-cam industry's current market is split 50-50 between governments and numerous commercial industries such as real estate, urban planning, and natural-resource exploration. A major hotel chain wants 3-D satellite imagery of all the best beaches in Cuba; scientists need photos of the rain forest to calculate its diminishing size. Yet no one knows for sure what untapped markets will emerge. New users mean more profits, and companies are banking on this. Anyone with "anything that needs to be mapped, measured, or monitored can use this new technology," explains Mark Brender, Washington operations director for Space Imaging.
The product of the satellites, high- resolution photos of Earth, are relatively inexpensive and will be available to any person wishing to purchase them on Internet sites at the starting price of about $30 per square mile. Once the satellites are up, up, and away and functioning, Web surfers will be able to plug in geographic coordinates, or even a street address, and obtain pics. The order can also be customized to match requested dates and times of day; sites will quickly confirm satellite availability.
No domain is technically free from the prying eyes of the commercial satellites. Individuals can't request that companies shut their cameras off when flying high above their property, explains Barry Beneski, spokesman for Orbital Sciences (orbimage.com), a corporation that plans to launch its own high-res satellite, OrbView-3, before the year is out. Restrictions, or "shutter control," can only be imposed by Uncle Samin times of national crisis, for instance. "Companies and nations have the ability to use space unrestricted," reasons Beneski. "We're not spying in people's backyards."
The resolution of the new satellite images, about 0.82 meters, is rivaled only by top-secret military satellites. The number refers to the area that is contained in one pixel. The first military reconaissance imaging satellite was launched by the U.S. in 1960 and was in use until 1971; those images had a resolution of two meters. Current military spy images are said to be far more detailed than their commercial counterparts. Legend has it that license plates are visible, which might imply that faces could also pop up. While the commercial satellites can't identify humansthe average standing person (from a bird's eye view) would not even be represented by a pixelthey can see vehicles and buildings, and can distinguish between a car and a truck. And there is no law that limits their optical power, causing critics to cite a slippery slope: eventually, the cameras might be able to see not only your face, but the pamphlets you are handing out on the streets.
PDD-23, the classified presidential directive signed by Bill Clinton in 1994, ultimately gave the green light for companies to take their information gathering up into space. Slated to expand jobs, economic growth, and competition in the international market for "remote sensing," PDD-23 does not set resolution limits for U.S. commercial spy satellites. Rather, the directive "ties [the satellites'] performance capabilities and imagery characteristics to those already available or planned in the world marketplace," explains John Baker, senior research scientist at George Washington University's Space Policy Institute. In other words, when two-meter resolution photos from a Russian satellite began circulating around Washington some five years ago, it was a safe bet that U.S. companies would raise the resolution ante, foreshadowing an arms race for the information age.
"The most significant issue right now is that there are no limitations on what kind of information can be collected and how it can be used," says Barry Steinhardt, associate director of the American Civil Liberties Union. That means no warrant requirements for law enforcement, and no judicial intervention before the fact. "As a rule of thumb, one ought not to be able to collect personally identifiable information without the consent of the individual."
And while the European Union has already adopted such measures in its data-protection directive, the U.S. has yet to see such legislation pass. "Information is very much an equalizer," says Beneski. The idea is that with unrestricted access to spy technology, a level playing field emerges. Maybe your soon-to-be ex can find out how big your assets really are for that upcoming divorce settlement, but, hey, you've got an opportunity to finally nab that lousy corporation that's said to be dumping toxic waste in the nearby river. "The potential good uses overwhelmingly outweigh any concerns people might have," Beneski says.