By Jared Chausow
By Katie Toth
By Elizabeth Flock
By Albert Samaha
By Anna Merlan
By Jon Campbell
By Jon Campbell
By Albert Samaha
The idea is to draw the Balkans into the European Union, liberalizing investment rules and reestablishing links to international financial institutions. Stabilizing economic ties may mean having to pay off Milosevic retainers, not to mention family members who reportedly have been shifting assets to South Africa, where Nelson Mandela has said they would be welcome if they are forced out (see last week's column).
In addition, inclusion means economic support for independent media outlets like Radio B92, as well as magazines and newspapers like Vreme and Republica, staffed with some of Europe's most fiercely independent journalists. The biggest problem may be defanging Milosevic's heavily armed national police possibly by first merging them into the army, and then, according to some optimistic scenarios, making the army part of NATO.
Also key to the postwar strategy will be encouraging people to vote. During the last election, in 1996, less than half the eligible voters went to the polls. Anti-Milosevic Serbs didn't vote because they didn't think it would make a difference. The Kosovars didn't vote because they were so alienated they only wanted independence. Now, if they want a future, they may have to get it at the ballot box.
Serb General Threatens 'Hell on Earth'
With the war wearing on both sides, it could go one of two ways: First, NATO could ratchet up the air campaign from the current 600 sorties per day by adding flights from Hungary and Turkey. Although civilian casualties would increase, NATO could gamble that it would get away with it. But a stepped-up campaign would have to show quick results.
The second possibility involves ground troops. Clinton was told by top NATO generals last fall, and more recently by his Joint Chiefs, that air power alone won't win the war. British prime minister Tony Blair was reported over the weekend to be increasingly frustrated by Clinton's refusal to deploy troops. Currently, there are 27,000 NATO troops in Macedonia and Albania, with 16,000 U.S. Marines on the way. A much larger contingent 75,000 is the figure often mentioned would have to start assembling in early June for a late-summer invasion. It would be a risky endeavor, with the invaders traversing hilly terrain into the basins of Kosovo, where they would confront at least 40,000 dug-in troops.
A smaller force with more limited objectives could fight its way into southern Kosovo, where it could impose a de facto partition. In such an event, Russian or Ukrainian soldiers could serve as peacekeepers in the north, with NATO troops controlling the southern half (and holding the Kosovo Liberation Army at bay).
The campaign would be brutal. "In the event of a ground invasion in Kosovo," Yugoslav general Nebojasa Pavkovic said on Tuesday, "NATO will suffer enormous human losses, and hell on earth will await its soldiers."
Whether Clinton's tutoring of Al Gore will put the boring veep on the comeback trail remains to be seen, but so far Prince Al's well-heeled campaign is reeling against George W. Bush's rope-a-dope tactics. Bush hangs back, saying little, while Gore fumbles around recounting his past as a hog farmer (which he wasn't), even sending Tipper out to win sympathy with news of her bouts with depression.
Last week, it was déjà vu all over again with Gore signing on '80s hack power broker Tony Coehlo as campaign chairman. Now Gore has two controversial figures at the helm of his campaign. Peter Knight, a veteran staffer and key fundraiser, was tarred by scandal when he chaired the Clinton-Gore 1996 rerun.
Knight narrowly avoided a Justice Department probe into allegations that he solicited funds from companies seeking government contracts. In another instance, his firm was enlisted to help broker the return of oil lands to the Cheyenne Indians in exchange for campaign contributions. In that deal, Knight was tied to longtime Gore financier Nathan Landow, who more recently has been under investigation by Ken Starr for obstruction of justice in the Kathleen Willey case. Knight and Landow deny any wrongdoing.
Coehlo, a six-term congressman from California's Central Valley, resigned suddenly in 1989 after reports about his investments in a Beverly Hills S&L linked to junk bond king Michael Milken. Coehlo's resignation came shortly after Speaker Jim Wright resigned in disgrace over ethics problems. When Wright stepped down, Coehlo had been in the running to be majority leader.
In 1989, the L.A. Times reported that the Justice Department had initiated an investigation of favors Coehlo and some associates had given to Milken. The department never confirmed or denied the story.
In his 1988 book Honest Graft: Big Money and the American Political Process, Brooks Jackson tells how Coehlo solicited money from the Teamsters, and then sought to intervene with the Justice Department on behalf of union president Jackie Presser.
Coehlo is seen as valuable to Gore because he can raise big bucks in California a state he knows extremely well where Gore draws much of his $8.8 million war chest. It is here, in an early primary next March, that the campaign may well be decided.