By Albert Samaha
By Amanda Dingyuan
By Anna Merlan
By Anna Merlan
By Albert Samaha
By Tessa Stuart
By Anna Merlan
By Roy Edroso
'One of the bidders is a brat-pack actor.' 'Times Mirror is in.' 'Yahoo! is out.' These were some of the rumors flying around last week, as the October 15 bidding deadline for Stern Publishing approached. The company, owned by Leonard Stern and made up of 'The Village Voice,' 'LA Weekly,' and five other alternative newspapers, is expected to go for up to $200 million. Barry Diller and Yahoo! aren't biting, but about half the bids are said to be from banks, with others coming from "vanity buyers" in search of social entrée. The smart money is betting on Stern selling to a mainstream newspaper chain.
Of course, it's impossible to confirm who's in and who's out, because everyone's sworn to secrecy. Leonard Stern and Stern Publishing president David Schneiderman would not talk on or off the record, though they did nothing to interfere with this article. But they clearly anticipated questions from the press. In a September 22 statement to Voicestaffers, Schneiderman announced he was going into no-comment mode and warned, "There will be a lot of rumors, stated particularly by people who like to present themselves publicly as 'players.' "
So far, the loudest rumors have come from Russ Smith, editor in chief and CEO of the New York Press, and from New Times, a chain of 11 alternative weeklies based in Phoenix, both of which are longtime Voicecompetitors. Smith has yet to write about the sale in his Mugger column. But Smith and New Times owners Mike Lacey and Jim Larkin have been floating takeover scenarios to friends, one of which involves the Stern group being bought by Russ's deep-pocketed brother, Randy Smith, who then cherry-picks the Voice for Russ and sells the rest to New Times. Another scenario has New Times coming in as a silent partner with Yahoo!, which similarly hacks it up.
Stern has always said he doesn't want to sell to the Smiths or New Times, but those lusty suitors insist that Stern will sell to the highest bidder, period. Smith also claims that Stern has been shopping the papers around quietly for months, to no avail. A Stern spokesperson denies the latter, insisting that Stern first put the Voice on the block September 22. An industry source says that Smith's claim is typical of a lurking buyer, who implies that a property is damaged goods in order to drive the price down.
One source in the Stern camp says the hitch in the Smith brothers' plan is that, as of October 13, they still didn't have "the book." Assembled by Veronis, Suhler & Associates, the bank handling the sale, this black monolith contains sections on each paper, including financial minutiae. Because each paper has a different financial structure, it would be impossible to place a value on Stern Publishing without it. The books are kept under lock and key, and anyone who gets one must sign a nondisclosure agreement. So it seems that Smith & Co. are just blowing smoke for now.
The next step in the process is due diligence, a pas de deux in which the seller and buyers inspect each other at close range. While the bank is deciding who has enough capital to close the deal, on October 25, a team including David Schneiderman and LA Weekly publisher Mike Sigman will take questions from a handful of suitors, who will then be able to adjust their bids. The final bids are due in November; Stern plans to close the deal in January.
Industry sources point out that because the company is privately held, Stern is not obliged to sell to the highest bidder. "If you own the property, you set the rules," says one. Presumably, he takes the highest bid from the person with the most secure financing, but he could end up taking a slightly lower bid from a buyer who he feels could perform better. On the other hand, just because an aspiring suitor hasn't got the book yet doesn't mean he can't drop in at the last minute. "If a Saudi prince called tomorrow and offered a billion dollars," one source predicts, "he'd take it."
Or would he? Stern has said he seeks a buyer who will keep the chain together, in order to preserve his legacy. That would disfavor an Internet company, whose main goal would likely be to convert the ads and listings to the Web. It also bodes poorly for a status-seeking buyer who might dump everything but New York and L.A., then refurbish the staffs with new people. An upscale newspaper chain would be least likely to change management and editorial, says one industry source. Why would anyone who could pony up $200 million want to risk his profits by disturbing the status quo?
Other factors that point to a buyer like Times Mirror or The New York Times Company: Stern wants to see his empire grow, and a big chain is likely to seek a national platform from which to expand. Indeed, Times Mirror already staked a claim in the alternative world in April, when it bought New Mass Media, a chain of newspapers in the Northeast. A mere month later, Stern began telling people of his decision to sell. (Times Mirror and the Times declined to comment. Knight Ridder and Conrad Black won't be submitting bids, according to spokespeople.)
Alas, the big chains are but neophytes compared to New Times, which is ironically the only potential buyer with any experience."They put out good newspapers and they understand the alternative newspaper business," says Richard Karpel, executive director of the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. And they are growing just last week, New Times bought the Kansas Citybased Pitch Weekly. But despite their enormous street cred and their $50 million credit line, New Times owners Larkin and Lacey don't have enough cash to buy the Stern group. And that's where the New York Press comes in. The Smith brothers can afford to buy the chain, but they aren't set up to run it, sources say.
The synergy doesn't end there: New Times and the Smiths are partners in the Ruxton Group, one of two firms that sell national ads for alternative newspapers. If the wild boys took over Stern Publishing, which belongs to a rival network, they could flip the ads to Ruxton, giving themselves an instant windfall.
And they can taste it. At a 1997 media conference, Lacey targeted his plans for the owners of what he called "the bad weekly newspapers." "My business is to retire their ass," he said. "I'm going to send them off to fucking Tahiti, cash them out, get their money. . . . I'm going to fire all the dead mooks that they've got working there, and . . . put in writers and editors who want to do something and get the job done."
Nice fantasy. But it's not happening. One Stern employee says that Stern "hates" New Times's management style. Another Stern employee says New Times "runs on testosterone. . . . The writers go in confident and talented, and come out humbled, humiliated, and totally lacking in self-confidence." Yet another inside source insists that Stern would find it "very distasteful" to sell to Russ Smith, "after competing with that jerk for so long."
Jim Larkin did not return two calls, and Russ Smith declined to comment.