Can a Book Murder?

The judge concluded: "This book constitutes the archetypical example of speech which, because it methodically and comprehensively prepares and steels its audience to specific criminal conduct—through exhaustively detailed instructions on the planning, commission, and concealment of criminal conduct—finds no preserve in the First Amendment."

illustration by Mitch O'Connell

As for the liability of Paladin Press in these murders, Luttig's decision contained a huge smoking gun. Stay tuned. On April 20, 1998, the Supreme Court of the United States refused to review Judge Luttig's decision.

« Previous Page