By Alex Distefano
By Scott Snowden
By Anna Merlan
By Steve Almond
By Jena Ardell
By Jon Campbell
By Alan Scherstuhl
By Tessa Stuart
There's been way too much whining about how there's no real cause for gay pride lately, and it makes me want to get off my broomstick and ram it up people's asses. You want to know about no gay pride? Board that very same broomstick, people, and travel with me to my childhood in Brooklynback to the '60s, when Dr. Laura Schlessinger would have not only been crowned borough president, she would have been granted an amusement-park franchise whereby she could decapitate queers and single mothers for taffy-eating throngs. Back then, gay equaled sick, and there were no dissenting arguments allowed and no positive role modelsor anyrole modelsto provide them, anyway. Homosexuality was a medical condition, an aberration, a Hollywood Square, and if you had it, you lived in clammy-palmed terror, praying you'd wake up and suddenly find yourself straight and on Love, American Style.
Once you'd faced up to your sexual leprosy, you had two choices: Live a lie and get married, making a sham out of some poor woman's (and your own) life while covering your tracks in the name of normalcy. Or wait to go over the bridge and realize there's a full, wacky life to be had, as long as you constantly tucked all lingering fears and foibles under your weekend evening gown.
But that was then, honey, when the only hint that there were gays in the military was Gomer Pyle. Today, we still have serious problems, but we have visibility, we have Bingo, we have an openlygay Square (Bruce Vilanch). We even have a sister on Survivor, and he's so far from a stereotype that he hasn't exhibited the slightest urge to decorate that island. Gay representation in showbiz has always reflected the zeitgeist for me, and the fact that it's stronger than ever, in its own halfhearted way, is providing the festive parasol in my Diet Fanta these days. Yes, there will always be stars who vehemently pretend to love the opposite sex organ and lots of it, but at least their claims are up for discussion now, as yellow journalism gets pinker than ever. At least now we have differing degreesof celebrity hiding, with enough visibility out there to give hope to the lonely little gays in the heartland.
The days when the vast majority of the entertainment media considered homosexuality a disgusting taboo are as over as the era when waxed eyebrows and that Jayne Mansfield poetry record were the only available gay signifiers. (The '97 Esquirecover story on Kevin Spacey seems to have changed reportorial boundaries forever.) This past year alone, Barbara Walters asked Ricky Martin about it, Janeand Outqueer-ied Whitney Houston on it, and I was going to mention it to Richard Simmons until they showed me the trailer door with a smile. Whether these stars evade, argue, or cop, the fact is it's suddenly sometimes sort of OK to bring "it" up (the sexless People cover on Rosie O'Donnell and the cancellation of that book investigating Kenneth Starr's closety gang of sex inspectors are rare exceptions), and that's the kind of thing that would have made all the difference in the world to my morbid little childhood.
Of courseyou knew there'd be a butat certain local cineplexes, Stonewall hasn't really happened yet. Though some screamers said we couldn't really be irked by The Talented Mr. Ripley's psychotic homo because we now have all kinds of gay screen portrayals, sometimes it seems as if the palette has simply been expanded to include gay victims. Movies about bashings, like Boys Don't Cry, make a powerful statement about various phobias, but the flip side of that is: no killing, no movie. (The similarly gender-bending jazz musician Billy Tiptonwho died from a bleeding ulcerhas yet to be filmized.) American Beautymade its own dark commentthe closet psycho killer represented self-loathing at its scariestbut it made you wish the now-you-see-them happy queer couple nabbed even half as much screen time as his crazy ass got. Gay-positive indie flicks like But I'm a Cheerleadercontinue to rate a rah-rah, messagewise, but most filmmakers would still rather go the "Oops! Everything's going wrong for Harryand now people think he's gay!" route. Even a fairly enlightened movie like American Psycho had a gay guy idiotically mistaking a strangulation attempt for a come-on, while Groovehas two stereotypically silly queens unable to even findthe big rave!
On TV, you wish there'd be more gay characters actually having physical contact and fewer of those drunken straights who share same-sex kisses before sobering up and goingonce again"Oops!" Most of the audience is way ahead of the networks, and once the execs catch up with them, the gay-as-neuter will become as obsolete as the shuffling black or inscrutable Asian. The masses might even be able to handle the truth about Bruce Vilanch, who everyone thinks is such a hit because he doesn't seem the least bit sexual. The reality is that certain elements of the gay population are so hot for "bears" that Vilanch probably has more guys chasing after him than 'N Sync!