By Lindsey Rhoades
By Chaz Kangas
By Ben Westhoff and Sarah Purkrabek
By Jena Ardell
By Jesse Sendejas Jr.
By Katherine Turman
By Steve Weinstein
By Araceli Cruz
Early Tuesday, September 11, conniving for a lead to begin this column, I fancied myself Diogenes in search of an honest singer, squinting through the light of my lamp and defeated by darkness time and again. A meager joke, but at 8:30 a.m., having listened to dozens of new recordings by women vocalists (saving the men for later), jokes were still easy to come by. Those who began the day with the Timeswere treated to a side-splitter, as the paper of record inexplicably devoted an arts lead to the book plugging of two unrepentant Weathermen bombers who said, from their prosperous academic perches, that they would do it again. The punch line was yet to come, of course. I suddenly recalled a promise to an editor friend to write 300 words about Harry Belafonte's The Long Road to Freedom, so I turned to do thatthe easy stuff. Then I discovered a voice-mail message from my assistant, Elora, who said she would be late because, apparently, a plane had crashed into the World Trade Center and subways were stalled. I had finished Belafonte and returned to Diogenes when a thumping on the door revealed my wife, Deborah, aghast and breathless, having just been evacuated from her office in the Empire State Building. Had I heard? Yeah, some kind of accident. The Pentagon was also hit, she said, and I, still in Diogenetic mode, said, "That's not necessarily a bad thing." Then we turned on the TV, and the jokes went out of me like bad food. Hours later, when I listlessly tried to return to the job, I felt ludicrous solemnizing over whether this singer was in pitch or that chart suitable. If I had chosen something to rave about, like the Belafonte, maybe I could have continued, certain in my faith that art conquers all. But the task of equivocating, of giving these women a hard time, seemed if not, to use a favorite word of talking heads, heinous (long a or long e, take your pick), certainly inappropriate. Never had I felt so utterly feckless as a writer.
If warfare waged by monsters who count life worthless could make my job insupportable on Tuesday, why should it seem less so on Wednesday or Thursday? BecauseI reasoned, reduced to clichésart is a balm, a reason for living, a hallowed calling, a religion that, unlike others, kills no one; at its best it wounds pride and shocks complacency, but it always leaves body parts intact. The only value of politicians is to keep political trouble at bay so that we can safely savor family, friends, and artthat's my mantra; at the risk of sounding Dorian Gray ("Was it not Gautier who used to write about la consolation des arts?"), I believe it. Critical attacks that get personal are unwarranted, but rooting out meretriciousness is always necessary. By late Wednesday I could begin again, buoyed by little incidents of the day. Crossing 14th Street on my way to the Voice, I had been stopped by a state trooper who was manning a barricade. He asked for ID and destination, and explained that as he wasn't from New York I would have to tell him where 36 Cooper Square is. When I did, he said, "Have a good one," which you don't expect at Checkpoint Charlie. At the editorial meeting I was moved by how moved everybody else was; journalistic cynicism was in smithereens, and Diogenes off sunning himself. Later I stood 10 minutes in line at Astor Place to buy a Times, just missing the last one. When I pointed to the copy where the vendor was sorting his change, he handed it to me, refusing my money! Since he had refused no one else's, I took this for an omen: Give Diana Krall a break. Or some such, oracles being so oracular.
Most of the problems with these singersthat they begin well but cannot sustain the length of a CD, that they repeat the same songs, that they are poorly served by arrangers looking for a moneyed soundare secondary to an issue echoed by events on TV: an insufficient attention to the meaning of lyrics. Following his AWOL afternoon, the president proved why the job should require respect for the English language. Pundits parroted FDR from 60 years ago, but all one could recall of Bush two minutes later was his nervous clasping of hands and an overwrought metaphor about steel girders and steel resolve that will live only in infamy. Similarly, Krall, who was so imaginative and even lively in her recent concert appearances and on last year's When I Look in Your Eyes, has knuckled to flat mannerisms on The Look of Love(Verve), an intermittently pleasing lite-jazz set orchestrated by veteran menace Claus Ogerman, who, lacking the honest schmaltz of a Gordon Jenkins, resorts instead to drawn-out endings and showy classical lifts. Deprived of her cheery trio, Krall is reduced to decorative piano solos ("Love Letters"), João Gilberto and Julie London imitations, half-spoken phrases, and practiced groans. She is better than this, better than lite, better than Ogerman, better than the booklet's cheesecake.