By Christian Viveros-Fauné
By Miriam Felton-Dansky
By Tom Sellar
By Tom Sellar
By Jessica Dawson
By Tom Sellar
By R. C. Baker
By Tom Sellar
Instead, Wood gravitates toward historical curiosities (her previous book was a slim history called The Smallest of All Persons Mentioned in the Records of Littleness), trawling vast oceans of research to focus on those menand it's always menwho dreamed of animating the inanimate: from Hero in 150 B.C., who created a proto-android controlled by cogs and pulleys, to Thomas Edison, who obsessed over his talking doll, which he boldly named Eve.
Looking beyond the contemporary emphasis on genetic determinism and DNA mapping to the places where science meets magic and mischief, Wood emphasizes the mercurial and sometimes creepy impulses that motivated these inventors. Descartesthe philosopher who laid the foundation for the notion of man as a living machinewas rumored to have built a replica of his dead daughter Francine. And Jacques de Vaucansonwhose defecating robo-duck thrilled crowds in the 18th centurywas plagued by an anal fistula that interfered with digestion, adding a poignancy to the intricate details of his creation's perfect poop; this shitting duck was both an "imaginary prosthesis" and "a reminder that civilization could not be separated from its waste."
Edison's Eve sets up each doll maker as the hero in an eerie historical mystery, with Wood playing the brainy bloodhound, doggedly sniffing down every last tangent. Often the research yields arcane gems, as in the case of Wolfgang von Kempelen's 1769 Automaton Chess Player, a robot in the shape of a turbaned "Turk" who won every game. The book rummages through the rumors and theories that circulated over the years: Was it a robot imbued with a living soul, a demonic presence, or a hoax? Wood not only unearths the secretthe man-machine was actually powered by a chess whiz crouching in the bowels of the statuebut even speculates on men like Jacques-François Mouret, who spent huge chunks of his life inside the Turk, providing its pre-Microsoft "artificial intelligence." He died drunk and miserable, leading Wood to conclude that Mouret was "the victim of an experiment whose object was to ascertain what was the most essential human faculty. What does a machine need in order to be human? And can a human reduce himself to that faculty alone? The more Mouret played, the more uncomfortable he was; his physical self was a thing to be overcome. . . . Enlisted by the puppetusedMouret became, after a while, useless." Wood returns to this issue with irritating frequency: What sets us apart from machines, and why does that blurry borderline make us so uneasy? But rather than answering this question, the book merely provides 101 examples of the anxiety robots have provoked through the ages.
On the other hand, Edison's Eve does a wonderful job of skittering through history, weaving connections between eras, and plotting forgotten landmarks on a map that exists only in Wood's head. She dedicates a chapter to Georges Méliès's metamorphosis from automaton aficionado and magician to filmmaker. Méliès pioneered a kind of enchanted cinema, visually conjuring tales of dolls coming to life, people appearing out of thin air, inanimate objects transforming into women. "Méliès transferred the quest of earlier android-makers to a new virtual reality. He made the human body do impossible things, and proved how mechanical or puppet-like our celluloid selves could be," Wood writes.
The book follows Méliès's life to the bitter end. Broke and humiliated, he was reduced to managing a toy stall at Montparnasse Station. In fact, most of the tales in Edison's Eve come to shabby endingseven the book's title story, that of Thomas Edison and his talking doll. After his invention of the lightbulb and the phonograph, Edison focused his attention on creating the perfect facsimile of a child, searching the world for the ideal eyes and hair, and constructing a factory capable of assembling 100,000 Eves a year. Wood details the industrial components used to create the illusion of delicate fawnish creatures and lingers over the bizarre image of little girls "spewing forth from Edison's factory, as if they were lamps or clocks." Proposing that Edison's doll obsession was an expression of his desire to create a perfect woman, Wood offers scant but amusing evidence: a creepy diary entry in which Edison writes, "Saw a woman get into a car that was so tall and frightfully thin as well as dried up that my mechanical mind at once conceived the idea that it would be the proper thing to run a lancet into her arm and knee joints and insert automatic self-feeding oil cups to diminish creaking when she walked." Edison failed to create his dream female in any formthe figurine was too heavy and its speech box too fragile. So he shuttered his doll factory, leaving Wood to wonder plangently what happened to the thousands of dolls, "victims, we may presume, of their own imperfection."