25% Off Dinner
new york, NY 10028
Holding this book in your hand, sinking back in your soft armchair, you will say to yourself: perhaps it will amuse me. And after you have read this story of great misfortunes, you will no doubt dine well, blaming the author for your own insensitivity, accusing him of wild exaggeration and flights of fancy. But rest assured: this tragedy is not a fiction. All is true.
With those wordsat the beginning of A Fine Balance (1995)Rohinton Mistry put himself forward as a great novelist. He was no newcomer: His first novel, Such a Long Journey, had been shortlisted for the Booker Prize. The passage was not his own, but Balzac's. As the epigraph to a 600-page novel, though, it served as a credo of sorts. A Fine Balance (it suggested) lay in the tradition of 19th-century realism but outside of the ambit of the British empire. Its author was Salman Rushdie's opposite, an expatriate in tidy Toronto instead of swinging London, more matter-of-fact than magical behind his clipped beard and big glasses. There would be no never-ending falls from airliners here, no punning neologisms, no human characters equipped with tails. Rather, there would be crime and punishment, sickness and death, described in a voice that like Balzac's was earnest, fond, confidinga voice of authentic tragedy, not fictional melodrama.
A Fine Balance found readers in America only in paperback and one at a time; yet by last November, when Oprah Winfrey made it one of her book club's final choices, the novel was so universally admired that there has been no backlash against it. It would be pleasing to report that Mistry has beaten the devil of literary celebrity by writing a great book for his new following. But Family Matters(Knopf, 434 pp., $26) is vexingly mediocrethoughtful, great-souled, generous toward characters and readers alike, but badly in need of a little artistry.
A Fine Balance told the story of four people drawn together in a shabby Bombay rooming house during the Emergency, when prime minister Indira Gandhi declared martial law. The student Maneck, the rural tailors Ishvar and Om, and the widow Daria Dal are a kind of cross-section of Indian society, and with transparent ease the novel shows them in all the circumstances of their livesat work, out and about on the streets of Bombay and remote villages, facing corruption firsthand, pushing past caste divisions and the reader's expectations alike.
In outline, Family Mattersbears a resemblance to A Fine Balanceand to Such a Long Journey, its real predecessor. As the bland title suggests, it is a domestic story. The drama begins when Nariman, an aging professor in the early stages of Parkinson's disease, falls and breaks his leg. His stepson and stepdaughter, Jal and Coomy, still live in his apartment, in a block of flats called Chateau Felicity, while his daughter, Roxana, and her husband, Yezad, are raising two sons in the nearby Pleasant Villa. Coomy, a devout Parsi, is still offended that Nariman openly loved a Catholic woman during his arranged marriage with her mother, and now seeks revenge by contriving to put Nariman out. So the dying patriarch winds up in the apartment of Yezad and Roxana, making their already hard life even harder. Funds for food and utilities run short, prompting Yezad, the manager of a sporting goods store, to try to win a few hundred rupees quickly in an illegal lottery run by the Muslim cabal Shiv Sena, and his younger son, a homework monitor at school, to contribute to the family kitty by taking bribes.
Mistry's obvious fondness for his characters is unusual in contemporary fiction, but as events take over he resorts to a kind of shorthand in telling their story. Where in his previous novels he created types and then complicated them, here he lets them remain types: Roxana the long-suffering housewife, Jal the patsy, Nariman the Lear-like patriarch, Coomy the shrewish villainess. He sketches Bombay in a few sentences and says little about Yezad's Parsi heritage until the story requires it. The family's povertythe root of their problemscomes and goes willy-nilly, and their desperation is not so much dramatized as announced by the omniscient narrator.
In the great novels that are Mistry's models, such a narrator is wiser than the characters and is able to show them to the reader in broad perspective. In Family Matters the narrator bluntly assigns emotions to the characters, at once telling them how to feel and telling the reader how to feel about them. Hearts skip beats or pound in chests; characters grumble, clench their fists, feel fear in the pits of their stomachs, weep until their vision becomes blurry, or get "lost in a cloud of optimism." Flashbacks are introduced mechanically: "Suddenly, Yezad's own youth was upon him. Memory began to populate the empty benches with faces from the past." Meanwhile, Nariman, slowly expiring in Yezad and Roxana's living room, recalls his past in italicized sections inserted at seemingly random points.
By the book's supposed climaxa fatal accident during the renovation of Chateau FelicityMistry is openly writing melodrama, as if his frank embrace of the genre will make up for his lack of subtlety. What has led him there? Too much confidence in his own powers? Faltering memory of Bombay after a quarter century elsewhere? Haste to get a book to market before Oprah's imprimatur fades? A wish to write a kind of Bollywood melodrama for Anglo-American readers? The temptationlurking at the desk of every real writerto just tell the story straight for a change, without cunning and artifice?
I agree, in a sense, that Mistry is probably being a bit pretentious in his storytelling. To attempt to weave and combine a families angst with the problems of a place like Mumbai is precarious work. However, I don't know how it could be done any better than Mr. Mistry has done it. However, what I think is really missed in your article is a description of the beauty found in Mistry's depictions of the mundane. This book is worth reading for it's (probably) isolated moments of raw emotion found in everyday life. If your looking for 400 pages of coherently painted portrait of Mumbai, you should probably look elsewhere. Also, I would just like to point out that the Shiv Sena were a fiercely Hindu group, not Muslim.
Hello, Thanks for your review, I wonder if you would like to read mine, where I ty to put what what you say about the novel into perspective: http://www.letstalkaboutbollywood.com/article-family-matters-46840816.html cheers
Its terribly sad how one loses the ability for recognizing the beauty and honestly in an artists work and trying to pollute it with the grime of ones own accumulated sense of self importance and rhetorical contemporary knowledge convincing the more gullible to believe that it is more important to be smart and say something convincing than be true and say something, maybe not that convincing, but more eternal. What is great art if not the distilled truth of the artists imagination? You are bringing down art to the realm of craft. It probably makes you feel good about yourself to do that, which is understandable of people who who try too hard but know they never can.Im sorry to be melodramatic, but believe me as long as there is truth under melodrama, it justifies its existence and even serves to enhance it.I hope you give yourself a chance and try to understand what im saying.
Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...
Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...
More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience
Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info
Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips
Log in or Sign up
Social Connect:Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.
Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:
Sign Up or Log in
Social Connect:Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.
Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:
