By Jared Chausow
By Katie Toth
By Elizabeth Flock
By Albert Samaha
By Anna Merlan
By Jon Campbell
By Jon Campbell
By Albert Samaha
Since 9-11, the government has moved to revive the legal mechanisms that gave us domestic spying under COINTELPRO in the 1960s, and last month, Roy Innis, the conservative head of the Congress of Racial Equality, and one of the two men Lott thinks he needs to sit down with now, suggested that the Department of Justice needs to investigate domestic Muslim groups for terrorists looking to recruit African Americans.
Innis may have taken his inspiration from several events: the July arrest of African American James Ujaama in Seattle; the October arrest of the Portland Sixalso African Americansin connection with alleged terrorist charges; and reports that D.C. sniper suspect John Allen Muhammad had been in the Nation of Islam. The sniper case in particular set off a frenzy of right-wing slander of African American Muslims. A search for published responses to this anti-black backlash yielded mostly opinions from African American columnists.
Reverend Al Sharpton, National Action Network president, responding through a spokesperson, said little was heard from leaders on the West Coast arrests "because, in general, 'black leaders' have lost their voice on most critical issues impacting people of color, and most politicos have moved so far to the center that they do not voice opposition to such issues."
Over the past two weeks the Voice called Sharpton and 11 other African American leaders to find out their concerns about the impact of such events on black communities. The questions dealt with the use of the USA Patriot Act (the 2001 anti-terrorism law that gives law enforcement broader authority to conduct electronic surveillance, search homes and offices, and provide grand jury information to intelligence organizations); the arrests of African Americans in connection with terrorist charges; and the possible need for a united black leadership to speak out against the racial profiling of African American Muslims.
In his statement, Sharpton said the USA Patriot Act "is currently impacting Muslims everywhere, including Brooklyn and Harlem," and he has previously "stated vehemently that he is against the USA Patriot Act because it is used to profile people of color," and that he "strongly feels that it will continue to victimize innocent people." Sharpton said he has connected with James Zogby, director of the Arab-American Institute, and others to discuss how blacks with Islamic surnames are being targeted and that he is "very concerned about the escalating problem of racial profiling in the war against terror." Sharpton also testified on the act at a special House Judiciary Committee forum called by Representative John Conyers.
One man who has been obliged to deal with the profiling of American Muslims is Minister Louis Farrakhan, head of the Nation of Islam (NOI). Following the arrest of John Allen Muhammad, Farrakhan spoke about the sniper suspect's NOI ties. After sharing his grief for the victims, according to the October 31 Final Call, Farrakhan said, "With the name Muhammad, many Muslims in the country already hurt, already damaged, stigmatized by the horrific events of September 11 and the aftermath of that, now to have a sniper, an alleged suspect named Muhammad, then all Muslims feel the pain again of such stigma attached to the religion of Islam."
At the press conference he said NOI teachings could not be connected to such violence: "The FBI knows us better than most of you, and they've been watching us very, very, closely for many, many, many years. They know our teachings sometimes better than the ministers who teach it." Farrakhan could not be reached for comment this week.
Asked about reaction among his constituents, Congressman Danny Davis of Chicago echoed Farrakhan's points. "The communities were already alarmed," said Davis. "People in places like Chicago and people who are concerned about civil liberties protection were already on the edge in terms of feeling that the USA Patriot Act went much too far, and that ordinary citizens would be vulnerable to all kinds of usurpations of individual rights. There is still a great deal of concern in relationship to being stigmatized. I think now people are feeling that unless they come out of it, the repercussions can be so severe. Are you willing to give up the freedoms that you have, risk internal protections in order to fight an external threat?"
Davis added, "I'm not sure that the information about what is going on has been made available, or that there has been enough widespread dissemination of the information. We make mistakes when we don't keep the link connected where young people can understand some of the past transgressions that have occurred which cause us to be leery of actions taking place today. This leeriness is based on something. McCarthyism was real. The police spying on innocuous organizations and citizens and activist-oriented groups [in the '60s]that was real. It was not imaginary, and our young people need to have a better understanding of it. And the only way they can get it is that we give it."