By Alex Distefano
By Scott Snowden
By Anna Merlan
By Steve Almond
By Jena Ardell
By Jon Campbell
By Alan Scherstuhl
By Tessa Stuart
Letter of the Week
Don't mess with Texas
Some of us Texans have been trying to get Baard's points across to folks for a long time. Dubya has impugned the noble-cowboy persona and the integrity that justly generated it. Can it ever be fixed? I don't know. If my daddy were still alive, he'd call him and the rest of his reprobates just what they were known as back then: a bunch of damned yahoos. In today's lingo, that phrase generally equates with the notion of a gang of drunken frat boys.
As many of us say, George Bush is all hat and no cattle. A cowboy he ain't.
Again with the cattle
Re Erik Baard's "George W. Bush Ain't No Cowboy" [September 29October 5]: Besides the very well-made points about Bush's lack of "cowboy" values, there is another thing one must have to be a real cowboy. That is, the ability to ride a horse. George Bush does not. He apparently is afraid of them. Some cowboy. As they say in Texas, "All hat and no cattle." Or maybe it should be, in Bush's case, "All hat and no horsey!"
Again with the horses
I grew up in the panhandle of Oklahoma in oil, gas, and cattle country. I went to an A&M college. I worked custom harvest, in the oil patch, and on the largest ranch in the panhandle. I know a cowboy when I see one.
The truth, as told in Texas, where I have resided for 17 years, is that Dubya is not a cowboy. He is a "drugstore cowboy" or what we derisively called a "cat daddy"wimps that wear dogger heels on their boots but don't own a saddle. (Dogger heels are hell to walk in but great for spurs.)
George W. is scared to death of horses. You will not see him in the Reagan pose, white hatted, riding the range at daybreak. He rides mountain bikes. Yee-haw!
San Antonio, Texas
NYU has it right, for the most part. I'm an adviser at another private college in Manhattanone without a thorough health survey for students. I've seen too many students flounder, stumble, or worse, as they try to ignore or hide their own previously diagnosed but untreated mental health issues. These students waste so much of their own time, health, and money, thanks to self-sabotage. I'm no advocate of antidepressants, but there are alternatives to medication, and they're often free or discounted to students. A student who discloses mental health issues in a "mandatory" survey does not need to be confronted about it without warrant (major gray area, I know).
However, for those of us who are here to help students to succeed, information like that which NYU is collecting could only be constructive in helping students to reach their goals. The number one reason that students provide for leaving the school I work at is lack of finances. The number two reason: mental health/health problems.
Too late, Tovar
Good lord, even the Fashion Week article ["A Dry White Season," by Lynn Yaeger, September 2228]has to be somehow turned into anti-Republican propaganda. I'm so sick of the whiny anti-Republican agenda being shoved down my throat by hysterical liberals in New York City. Please don't start turning the arts and fashion sections into soapboxes too.
She's a sensation
Donna Gaines's article about Johnny Ramone [The Sound of the City, September 2228] was the best obit I read anywhere about my old friend. Donna is a great person and wonderful writer. Thank you for publishing something that was so heartfelt.
Hope for hippie headbanger
I just wanted to let you know how much I enjoyed Donna Gaines's tribute to Johnny Ramone. I am old enough to have been a true hippie. Even though the Ramones ragged on us mercilessly, many of us who were and are headbangers really loved their music. I saw them three or four times in Jersey, and never danced as energetically and happily as I did at those shows. I can't believe Joey, Dee Dee, and Johnny are all gone. Gaines is right: They gave so many young people hope, and now they and their music will live forever in our bloody little hearts. Gabba gabba hey!
Dave "the Rave" Bass
Montclair, New Jersey
Your September 2228 cover claims that Nicholas Turse's "Swift Boat Swill" vindicates John Kerry's 1971 testimony, but that is only half true. The investigations Turse has uncovered in U.S. military archives demonstrate conclusively that atrocities such as those described by Kerry occurred. However, we already knew that. The new examples do not prove Kerry's most important claim, indeed the point of his testimony: that war crimes were "not isolated incidents but crimes committed on a day-to-day basis with the full awareness of officers at all levels of command."
If we are truly interested in that question, we have to ask whether the incidence of atrocities committed in Vietnam was notably greater than other wars. Turse only refers to the hundreds of files and notes: "The exact number of investigated allegations of atrocities is unknown, as is the number of such barbaric incidents that occurred but weren't investigated." Nor, it should be added, is the relationship between the number of investigations and the number of actual atrocities.