By Albert Samaha
By Darwin BondGraham
By Keegan Hamilton
By Anna Merlan
By Anna Merlan
By Tessa Stuart
By Tessa Stuart
By Albert Samaha
Letter of the Week
Just Another Player
So Al's got a honey on the payroll of a nonprofit. Big surprise (and believe me, Al's hit a whole lot lower than this). Al Sharpton is a hustler, nothing more, nothing less. Religion, his first hustle, is a perennial favorite of Al's. The election has provided him an opportunity to dust it off and score yet again. He next hustled race, which reaped many large paydays, but the race hustle is not as lucrative as it used to be. Thus came politics, which, as we know, is the mother lode for a flimflam artist. Reverend Al, the man who didn't even own his wardrobe, has lived large at the expense of others all his adult life. He isn't going to change. The truly pathetic players are the Tim Russerts and the Democrats, who dance to the tune of Al's grift. Al Sharpton runs a three-card monte game, and they all play along like the suckers they are.
Re Sharon Lerner's "The Fetal Frontier" [December 8-14]: As a pro-choice feminist, a practicing Catholic woman, and a card-carrying member of Planned Parenthood and NARAL, I applaud the willingness of Frances Kissling (president of Catholics for a Free Choice) to wrestle with the hard questions challenging us as advocates of legal abortion. I hope we in the abortion movement take up her challenge to seriously consider alternatives to the current stalemate.
Women's reproductive rights will only be secure if we win more hearts and mindsand that's not happening now. Abortion isn't like other medical procedures or legal rights. Women struggle with the decision for many reasons that make the word "choice" seem trite or inappropriate: They're too young, too poor, uninsured, unemployed, or without a reliable partner. After their abortions, women may feel relieved, morally justified, empowered, happy or sad, or all of the above. But for many this decision is difficult because they do indeed value the potential life the fetus. Clinic counselors deal with that reality every day. For too long the public discourse on abortion has been frozen.
As each side narrows its public position to effectively win in the legislature or the courthouse, the vast majority of Americans are resentful of the oversimplifications, the 30-second soundbites of both sides. If pro-choice advocates can publicly acknowledge the value of the fetus, then perhaps pro-life activists could embrace policies that reduce the need for abortion rather than seek more state control over women. Only then can we open up a discussion that engages the majority of Americans in our laws and public policy.
While I am grateful to see the issues raised by Sharon Lerner discussed in any context, there is much missing in both historical context and current awareness. That pregnancy and abortion are complex issues was a root belief of the early feminist women's health movement, and of the clinics they created, where the home birthing and midwifery movements were integrated, along with the movements for contraceptive education and the right to abortion, within a larger movement for reproductive rights. This was about the handcuffing of biology in the destiny of women, and it still is. It has been many years since feminists first began warning their colleagues that the more we learn of fetal development, the more we will need to grapple with questions of human development and moral agency. I would point you to the work of Peg Johnston, members of the November Gang, and others collaborating with groups like the Abortion Conversation Project. And I would ask you to go back and reconsider some of the early writings in the feminist women's health care movementwe have lost some of the big picture since, but in many ways we had it right in the beginning.
I have read Robert Sietsema's food articles for a while, and though he shows a good knowledge of a wide variety of ethnic cuisines, he routinely makes egregious errors when describing South Indian and Sri Lankan fare. "Day of the Dosa" [December 15-21], a review of Dosa Hut in Jersey City, mentions that dosa is "French-inspired." Readers merely need to know it resembles the crepe, and not be told some vaguely Eurocentric notion that dosas were yet another gift from the Great White Father to his retarded brown stepchildren. Upma is not a snack in South India. Dosa is also mentioned as being a snack, but is strictly a lunch or dinner item. The same goes for iddly. Though in many households it is a breakfast food, in South India breakfast can be a very serious, often daunting, meal for foreigners. I would hate to see further misrepresentations of the cuisines of South India and Sri Lankatwo areas where cooking takes up most of the day and people are serious about it, not because they are snobs, but because food is central to family life and maintains its status as the foundation of society.
No Ploy Intended
I am writing in response to James Ridgeway's "Black Sea Intrigue" [Mondo Washington, December 1-7]. Ridgeway is making a serious error in judgment by drawing the conclusion that Ukraine's fight for democracy and a fair election is a neocon ploy. I agree with Ridgeway's views on Iraq and other right-wing agendas. However, the situation in Ukraine is about 48 million people who deserve to determine their own future, without the U.S. and Russia's $100-million-plus interference.
Jeb for Prez
I am wondering why James Ridgeway's "A Heartbeat Away" [November 24-30], about a possible successor to Cheney, left out the prez's own brother. Notwithstanding a charge of nepotism, Jeb has the experience and credibility that comes with being the governor of a large state. He has only two years left as governor and would give the Bushies a chance for another eight years at the trough. Is it possible that he isn't conservative enough for his brother?
Akintade the Good
I just finished reading Kareem Fahim's "Iraq's Gravity Pulls a Soldier Down" [December 1-7], on Specialist Akintade. (I was told by my girlfriend that you did a story on him.) Akintade was in my squad, and in my old company, B Company 1/105th, before we got called up. He was one of the best human beings that I've had the chance to know. Part of the time while we were deployed, I was his squad leader. Even though we were both specialists, he gave me no conflict. I mean, he was a guy you could get mad at, but it wasn't anger; it was that he was so playful it annoyed you sometimes, but you loved him always.
He will definitely be missed. I want to thank your paper for doing a good story on him; there have been other stories, but I wasn't pleased with them. This captured the essence of the man the best. I have always been a reader of the paper, and I will continue to be one. Thank you.
Specialist David James
Alpha Company 2/108 Infantry
Wayne Barrett ["On a New High, Sharpton Hits a New Low," December 8-14] says Sharpton has hit a "new low." What could be worse than having engineered the mother of all race hoaxes, and having the blood of the seven victims of the Harlem Massacre on one's hands?
Re Anya Kamenetz's "Social Insecurity" [Generation Debt, December 1-7]: The photo caption in this story speaks volumes about what is wrong with this country: "Bleak horizon: If the government can't protect your parents, you get to make up the shortfall." It was not all that long ago that most people expected to help take care of their parents first, and only looked to the government for help as a last resort. While there is no doubt that soaring personal debt is a serious problem and a contributing factor to retirement worries, using the "Jacob Hall" example will hardly evoke sympathy from most hardworking people. Who paid for Jacob's "prestigious university" education? If his parents are now in serious financial trouble from having subsidized his education, he should stop whining about having to finally start paying his parents back! Why should the government (which is funded by people who actually work) have to foot the bill because Jacob wants to continue being a student and his parents have made bad choices?