By Jared Chausow
By Katie Toth
By Elizabeth Flock
By Albert Samaha
By Anna Merlan
By Jon Campbell
By Jon Campbell
By Albert Samaha
That's contrary to the news accounts that continue circulating online. Two weeks after the fracas, the Brooklyn Skyline ran a lead story slugged "Non-Bias Attack" featuring emotional quotes from the white mothers describing their daughters' injuries. Embedded in the dramatic prose"witnesses say the attackers called their victims 'white crackers' during the bloody melee"was an implied critique of local cops, who had just announced to a seething South Brooklyn town hall meeting that their investigation turned up no racial bias.
The following week the paper printed a slew of mail boiling with invectivemuch of it from outside New York. A note from the editor said the most "obscene and unprintable" letters were withheld.
Here are excerpts of ones the paper did print:
"If the police department does not arrest all those involved in this ape-assault, then we as white people our safety is doomed," wrote Paul DeLaiarro, location not printed. "We do not have the same protection as these sub-humans. You should be ashamed of where you live if you are white and this is your police department."
Or this, from Sean Verste of New Zea- land: "One would have to ask what would have happened if 30 white youth attacked four blacks while shouting David Duke's name." If you can't see his point, he con-tinued, "you deserve to be slaughtered by the ever breeding, ever eating cancer of blacks."
Or this, from A.K. of New Jersey: "When the parents fail, and the school system fails, it's time for hard-core enforcement. Whether by courtroom or a baseball bat, whether by a prison sentence or a burning cross, it has to be done."
Freelance reporter Marianna Hernandez, who covered the story for the Skyline, says she took some heat from the cops for implying their judgment was off, but she doesn't take responsibility for firing up the bigots. "I am not a racist, but this is something that happened to these [white] girls and people responded to us," she says. "We don't agree with everything our readers write inI heard David Duke wrote in but I didn't read that one. I didn't want to."
When the trial opened, only two St. Edmund's mothers were there to hear the testimony of the first complainanta sturdy-looking 15-year-old brunetteas she described smacking a 14-year-old black girl in the head after the younger girl struck first. The black girl punched her with a closed fist, she explained to the prosecutor in short, clear sentences. She told the judge a black boy eventually stood between them, but her adversary "reached around him and slapped me in the head." She said she started yelling at the black girl and called her "an animal." The girl called her "a bitch," she said. "Then we started hitting each other again."
Smiling, the prosecution's first witness scanned the cramped room packed with bored-looking lawyers. Sitting in the back were at least 10 stone-faced black mothers, grandmothers, fathers, and uncles. Sandwiched between were six painfully neat 13- and 14-year-olds, the five original girls and a boy arrested weeks later, all sitting rigid in their chairs, hair freshly done.
The St. Edmund's parents are still annoyed with the cops. "The police just didn't listen to our girls," Joanne Eisen says. "They were willing to just dismiss it as a playground thing." One father, who asked that his name not be used in order to protect his daughter's privacy, says cops interrupted his daughter and her friends before they could say anything about the epithets.
That 13- and 14-year-olds would invoke the civil rights movementor use vintage slurs like "honky"makes observers like City Councilmember Charles Barron, of Brooklyn, incredulous. "I wish these kids would talk about Martin Luther King and some black power," he said, chuckling. "As for 'cracker,' they wouldn't have even known the meaning of that word. Anyway, the police do thorough investigative work. They would've gotten that."
Of course, whether the alleged slur was 'cracker' or 'white bitch' is immaterial, if you think a racial put-down necessarily equals racial hatred. The St. Edmund's parents are certainly of that belief. But it's hard to know if their daughters are as convinced.
This case is a classic illustration of why the hate crime statutes are problematic, says Bronx lawyer David Feige, an outspoken critic of them. "These laws sound goodthat's why they were passed. But they serve no purpose except to give prosecutors an even heavier bat. They don't deter criminal acts in the least. It's complete political posturing."
The mere mention of the phrase "hate crime" in relation to the case makes many white neighborhood folks roll their eyes. Retired public school guidance counselors Barbara Lewis and Frances Pearce are disgusted by the fuss. "The Caribbeans play cricket here," says Lewis. "Black and white boys play basketball together, the Italian men play boccie. It's opportunistic for some people to make it a race issue. Kids can be nasty, kids can be horrible. I'm sure words were exchanged, but did it begin because of race? I don't think so."
The white kids hanging out on the basketball court directly behind the junior high have a less rosy and coherent view of Marine Park race relations. Still, they agree that labeling the fight they've heard so much about seems like a stretch.
A pale, petite 16-year-old alpha girl was more than certain about that. "Racial things happen here, but that wasn't racial," Jackie says. "It's just the fact that those girls were being bullies and the Catholic girls were showing off."