Top

music

Stories

 

Regress-to-the-Mean Girls

The Pipettes give feminism, '60s pop, and foxy librarians a bad name

Anyone who worries about Next Big Things has likely come across Brighton, England's Pipettes, a trio of fetching late-twenties ladies making the rock critic rounds in kitchen-sink frocks. I'll be accused of assassination by proxy, of burning a flag the Pipettes didn't raise first, but these girls—and the boys who brought them together (and play the instruments behind them)—keep lobbing eephus pitches right into my wheelhouse. Theirs is one of the most misguided constructs in recent memory: femme-positive stance music out to take "ownership" over servile, misogynist wardrobes and eep-op-ork-ah-ah bubblegum from the early '60s. The Pipettes profess musical erudition, solipsist wonder, and DIY confidence, lifting carelessly and equally from American girl groups and the anorak (U.K.) '80s, even covering the bases with more obscure names like the Pop Group and John Cage, both mentioned in a ponderously melodramatic, self-penned biography available at thepipettes.co.uk.

Stance music for "naughty librarian" fetishists
photo: Mel Bes
Stance music for "naughty librarian" fetishists

Beyond ridiculous contradictions—feting Phil Spector then segueing into feminist rhetoric in the same paragraph, UHHHH—the Pipes have lashed out with withering "We've nothing against them" backhands at British pop idols like Girls Aloud (the new Spice Girls), damning their rivals' extroversion and settin'-us-back skin-trading in interviews. In reality the Pipettes are making waves for the same reasons, but nobody seems to be pointing out that their Wonderbra-and-polka-dot costume play, with a not-so-subtle dominatrix sneer reserved for naughty librarians, is abject fetishism. Of the many subjects on which the Pipettes are eager to appear well-informed, the nature of their modest success seems to mystify them, so instead they drone on about eras long gone, with a spoon-fed, halcyon view of America's hit factories revealed in interview quotes like "The thing about Motown is that during that time real pop songs with depth and musical integrity were being made, before everything became dominated by men and guitars." I would venture the "hit factory" double entendre escapes them.

Patched together from previously available singles (the Pistols' modus operandi), the band's import debut, We Are the Pipettes, is a worthy enough addition to the lineage of aloof-yet-yearning female pop. Critics and attuned fans know the lazy-ways sha-la rainy-daydreamers that preceded them (Thee Headcoatees, Talulah Gosh, Heavenly, and especially Marine Girls); this trainspotting isn't a prerequisite, but it's important to note that none of their inspirations needed the ideological crutches the buxom Pipettes hobble on. These older bands hit harder and made bolder sociopolitical statements precisely because they didn't spell things out, letting attitude and career choices define them. With such a slight catalog—barely over a baker's dozen songs, and only a few you'll remember—the Pipettes' early success is principally down to the juicy subject matters they lend critics an excuse to explore. Like those who fawn over them, the Pipettes have talked their way into this party, and I suspect we will not notice when they have left.

 
  • peptobismo 08/29/2006 3:41:00 AM

    True, yes, derivative should not instantly be rejected, yet I think Ott gives many reasons why The Pipettes particular brand of nostalgia is so off-putting. I despise bands that utilize consciously kitschy premises for attention and then abandon it once their collective feet are through the door, and it of course remains to be seen whether the Pipettes will or not, but when one sees their videos, with the girls trying their best to make their cutie pie 60's dance moves look earnest, one cannot help to look at their conceit with a suspicious eye - is doo-wop pop, and their modern day interpretations of it, really their true calling, or is making contrarian, 'look how cute I am' pop really what it's all about? Ott, like I, choose the latter. And because I've assumed the latter, I find it insulting that these girls reference the past as some singularly rosy era of pop music, a time not "dominated by men and guitars..." As if that time ever existed, ladies. And I agree with Ott, it's an idiotic comment that should be ridiculed! Karen Carpenter made beautiful pop music without ever having to emulate any woman from any decade. ABBA, probably the best pop songwriters ever, performed dazzling, feminine POV'ed songs without ever resorting to cheap pantomiming. The list goes on into the 80's and 90's. Point is... beautiful pop music, however rare it may be nowadays, still exists, and there will always be room for good pop music. I just find it empty and sad that these women have to play the nostalgia card, and then politicize it, to try to get their pop music message across. What's old fashioned about that?

  • jniimi 08/27/2006 7:08:00 AM

    I miss the days when rock critics used to refer to "constructs" as "bands". This is one of the most confused and hypocritical pieces I've ever read in the Voice, not to mention one of the most "ponderously melodramatic". It's critically lazy to dismiss something merely because it's derivative (especially in this case, where being derivative is the point), and to say that liking '60s girl groups makes you a misogynist (or a bad feminist.) Who made these rules? In any case, I doubt many Pipettes fans worry about their politics much (I don't), or their "ideological crutches" (though since the topic seems to interest you, it wouldn't hurt to take a look at your own.) Even if part of the Pipettes' appeal is their wacky/sexy image, I don't think it's "abject fetishism" -- I think it's pretty unremarkable fetishism. I mean, should they be wearing potato sacks instead? If you applied this same critical yardstick to any female pop star, you'd be laughed out of the room.

  • sethvpc 08/25/2006 6:23:00 PM

    It makes me sad when journalists have to invent phrases to make up for a lack of research. "Lobbing eephus pitches right into my wheelhouse" ? Dude, get a grip on reality, come back down to earth, have a look around. Its nice here, and maybe with your head removed from your backside you will actually be able to HEAR the glorius Pipettes, not just the muddy sound of your own preconceptions.

  • peptobismo 08/24/2006 4:21:00 AM

    Whew. I couldn't quite put my finger on what the hell bugged me about these girls. Not only did your finger do the finding, I think you tore 'em a deserved new one as well.

 

Most Popular Stories

Find a Concert


Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy