By Jared Chausow
By Katie Toth
By Elizabeth Flock
By Albert Samaha
By Anna Merlan
By Jon Campbell
By Jon Campbell
By Albert Samaha
The 65-year-old onetime tax lawyer thought he'd made his case well28 years on the Ways & Means committee, a member of the Joint Budget Conference Committee, a lifetime, as he described it at the hearing, of "immersion in the substance of state financial matters." Noting that there was "no more appropriate place" for an independent reformer like him "than the comptroller's office," Grannis had just finished testifying that his selection would be "the natural evolution of what I have been doing for the past 30 years."
Then the phone rang.
"As soon I came back, an aide to the governor called," Grannis later told the Voice. The aide "said the governor would like to offer you the job of Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) commissioner." Grannis was stunned. "I didn't put in an application. I didn't ask anyone to advance my name. I didn't even know I was under consideration."
The chairman of the assembly's insurance committee for 14 years, Grannis had worked with Spitzer and some of his top staff during the attorney general's 2005 battle with major insurers and brokers, uncovering "collusion, fraud, and market manipulation." He and Spitzer had developed what Grannis called a "professional, not personal" relationship. He'd even spoken, ever so briefly, to the governor about the environmental job on January 2, the day after Spitzer took office.
Spitzer was trying then to talk him out of seeking the comptroller's post, contending that a finance manager, not a legislator, should be named. In a fleeting fashion at the end of the meeting, as Grannis recalled it, he told Spitzer that he would consider the DEC appointment. The governor simply said "that's very interesting." When Spitzer failed in the ensuing three weeks to raise the subject again, Grannis assumed the idea was dead.
He had some reason to think DEC was a good fit for him. He'd started his public career in the early '70s as an attorney at the agency. Since then, he'd been such an activist environmental legislator that several of the leading green groups had honored him. But his focus in recent years had been elsewhere, and he'd consciously chosen not to go before the transition committee set up by Spitzer to select DEC's new commissioner. That transition committee, chaired by Syracuse lawyer John Murad, had by and large finished its work back in December, interviewing several top candidates and reaching out widely to their references. In January, the state police were busily conducting background investigations of at least one finalist, contacting people who knew him. Joe Martens of the Open Space Institute, attorney Michael Gerard, former New Jersey environmental commissioner Brad Campbell, and Judy Enck, an environmental aide to Spitzer in the attorney general's office were among those interviewed.
Confronted that afternoon with a concrete offer, Grannis told Spitzer's aide he would get back to him. He slept on it. The next morning, he sat in his office and watched the second day of comptroller candidates appear on camera, studying the competition. He thought his fellow assemblyman, Tom DiNapoli, did well. From the beginning of the comptroller sweepstakes in December, DiNapoli, a popular legislator close to Speaker Shelly Silver, was seen as the assembly's favorite candidate. DiNapoli's inside track, which ultimately led to his recent selection, was one of the factors pushing Grannis toward accepting Spitzer's tantalizing offer.
That afternoon, he decided to take the DEC job and pull out of the comptroller race. On Thursday morning, as the screening panel met to make their final recommendations, Grannis's DEC appointment was announced. The panelconsisting of ex-comptrollers Carl McCall, Jay Goldin and Ned Reganthen made the controversial decision to submit only three names to the legislature, which always had the constitutional authority to decide who would fill the recently vacated shoes of convicted comptroller, Alan Hevesi. None of the five assemblymen who appeared before the panel was selected.
"Pete would have come out," one member of the panel told the Voice. "Just before we started the deliberations, we got this call and we were told that Pete was out. He was appointed as we met. We talked about Pete and we had positive feelings about him." This member, who asked not to be named, said he and a second member agreed that "Pete would have made the list." Grannis says he had no way of knowing that, nor did he know that the panel would decide so quickly and that all he had to do was wait a few hours to find out if it had recommended him. He insists that Spitzer "did not pressure" him for an immediate answer, but that he simply decided DEC was "a premier job offer that trumped the comptroller position."
"The timing was bad," Grannis acknowledges, adding that he "believes" he got messages from Spitzer's aide as he paced outside the hearing that morning, nervously anticipating his appearance and unable to take a call. He said that Spitzer's office told him they had decided to give him the job "over the weekend," but failed to make contact until after he formally entered the comptroller competition.
The Albany Times Union reported a day later that Grannis's appointment came as "something of a surprise," adding that "his name was not among those thought to be in contention even a few days ago." A candidate who was interviewed by the Murad panel told the Voice: "I was very surprised by the selection. The committee said they were intent on selecting a real environmental professional. That's not what they got. I think the panel was frustrated." But the linkage between the DEC job and the comptroller race has never been made, except by Spitzer critics who observed that DEC has a thousand more employees than the comptroller, making Grannis's appointment inconsistent with the governor's insistence that the new comptroller had to have significant management experience.
The anonymous panel member and Spitzer's spokeswoman Christine Anderson argue that Spitzer could not have known that Grannis would've made the list. Anderson told the Voice that neither Spitzer nor anyone on his behalf had any interactions with the panel after the screening process began. While some press reports have suggested that there were contacts, none have been established. The DEC and comptroller's jobs "just aren't linked," Anderson said, insisting that Grannis was picked for DEC "purely on the basis of his qualifications." **Informed in detail of the scenario Grannis described, including the dearth of contacts between January 2 and January 23, Anderson didn't challenge any of it. All she said about the bypassing of the transition committee's recommendations was that "names were brought to our attention" both by the committee and "outside" its purview.
But all Spitzer needed to know was that Grannis might get the panel's seal of approval to have reason to tab him for DEC. In fact, Grannis's presence in the race was a problem for Spitzer regardless of what the panel did.
That's because of Grannis's unique relationship with the editorial page of The New York Times. In 2004 and 2006, the Times ran editorials shortly before the general elections that so bemoaned the dysfunction of the state legislature they urged voters, wherever possible, to vote against incumbents of either party. The only exception to that rule in both editorials was Grannis, who it rightly saluted as a voice for ethics in a compromised capital. Having praised him so uniquely and having editorialized again and again about the admirable ethics legislation he has introduced, the Times would've been hard-pressed to embrace a panel outcome that excluded him.
So, getting Grannis out of the picture before the panel reported enabled the Times to enthusiastically join Spitzer in the campaign to make the panel's choices appear pure and wise. In so doing, the paper willfully ignored its own prior description of Goldin as a comptroller whose conduct made it "long for the simpler days of Boss Tweed," or its blast at Regan's "insensitivity to the appearance of corruption."
Had Grannis stayed in the game and been the only assemblyman recommended, the legislature, of course, would've selected him, the Times would've applauded, and the war that our steamroller governor apparently very much wanted would've been averted. The last-second maneuver for Grannis, combined with the abrupt deep-sixing of Spitzer's own DEC selection process, is evidence of just how determined the governor was to put Silver between a rock and a hard place. Though the war that followed the legislature's spurning of the panel and appointment of DiNapoli is over a prerogative constitutionally restricted to the legislature, the Grannis saga suggests that it was one the new governor consciously provoked.
Research assistance: Matt Friedman, Dan House, Brian Lisi, Hannah Vahl