|
Art
Art
Springtime for ZizekPlus one we've all been waiting for: the Reagen-obsessed serial-killer movie!J. HobermanTuesday, February 27th 2007It's not exactly like being the heavyweight champion of the world, but for my money at least, Slavoj Zizek is the undisputed spritz master of international cinema studies. Zizek, who has also lately been something of a documentary film star, will be seen to splendid effect this season in The Pervert's Guide to Cinema a two-and-a-half-hour illustrated lecture directed by Sophie Fiennes having its local premiere with a weeklong run at the Museum of Modern Art in April. Nothing if not a polymath, Zizek has written on Communism, Christianity, and the "obscene object of postmodernity." His thick, sibilant accent and rapid-fire rant unavoidably reminiscent of Borat Sagdiyev,Slovenia's leading Hegelian-Lacanian theorist holds forth in Pervert's Guide on the nature of cinematic fantasy. As Zizek characterizes The Birds as a movie in which reality is torn asunder by "a foreign dimension," so the shaggy philosopher regularly inserts himself into the films he's analyzing. Zizek is a sensational performer and he can also be quite funny, not least because he presents himself as an unsmiling madmaneven when comparing the magic moment when the lights go down before a movie starts to the experience of staring into a toilet bowl and waiting for something to appear. The Pervert's Guide offers a Zizek crash course. As texts, he favors mainly horror flicks ( The Exorcist, Alien), heady sci-fi ( The Matrix, Solaris), and psychosexual dark comedies ( The Piano Teacher, Fight Club). Not surprisingly, his key directors are Alfred Hitchcock and especially David Lynch (he of the terrifying father-figures and "ridiculously violent comedy"). But Zizek can also be quite moving with his offhandedly cinephilic readings of Chaplin ( City Lights is "too sophisticated for the sophisticated"), Andrei Tarkovsky (whose "pre-narrative density" is an attempt to make tangible "time itself"), and Lars von Trier ( Dogville is concerned with the problem of persuading people to "still believe in the magic of cinema"). And it's hard to think that Freud wouldn't have appreciated Zizek's use of the Marx Brothers to explicate the workings of the unconscious. Punctuated by a chorus of Rorschach tests, Zizek's discourse has its own particular free-associational logic. He characterizes the image of Kim Novak in the middle of a florist shop, glimpsed by Jimmy Stewart through a door partially opened onto an alley, as the "most beautiful" shot in Vertigo; 15 minutes later, in the context of Blue Velvet, Zizek exclaims that he personally finds flowers "disgusting." They're an open invitation for insects to come and have sex. (There's a thought for spring.) For Zizek, cinema is a way of thinking, or rather it's a machine that plays with (and domesticates) fantasy to instruct the viewer how to desire: "We need the excuse of a fiction to state what we truly are." Exposing the man behind the curtain in The Wizard of Oz does not dispel the illusion on the screenaccording to Zizek, that's the essence of movies, a fiction "more real than reality itself." Offside 'The Real Edie Sedgwick' Vacancy The Long Goodbye The Tripper 1 2 Next Page »
Recent ArticlesMore by J. Hoberman
show/hide comments (0)
write a comment
Site Search «Most Popular
|
|||||||