By Amy Nicholson
By Stephanie Zacharek
By Calum Marsh
By Stephanie Zacharek
By Inkoo Kang
By Voice Film Critics
By Alan Scherstuhl
By Alan Scherstuhl
Along the way, Lynch shares the ingredients of his best-known recipes (Twin Peaks, Blue Velvet), as well as some of the more exotic ideas hes managed to catch (I dont necessarily love rotting bodies, but . . . the textures are wonderful). Midway between chapters devoted to Kubrick and Common Sense, a whale emerges from the depths. Im through with film as a medium, Lynch declares. For me, film is dead.
Lynch made good on this promiseor bad, depending on your point of viewwith last years release of Inland Empire, a movie shot with the Sony PD-150, a low-grade digital-video camera considered obsolete for serious feature filmmaking. Like his previous film, Mulholland Drive, Inland Empire tells the story of a woman lost in the labyrinth of self. Laura Dern plays Nikki Grace, a Hollywood actress in the grip of a violent identity crisis, the nature of which is reflected in the elusive, dreamlike shape of the movie. But where the glamorous look of Mulholland Drive referenced the Hollywood past (westerns, musicals, film noir), the rough textures, weak colors, fuzzy depth of field, and structural volatility of Inland Empire resembled nothing so much as YouTube having an epic nightmare.
Audiences expect the unexpected from Lynch, but many critics were appalled by this new direction. In thrall to the vanishing art of 35mm cinema, they failed to appreciate the extraordinary variety and visual richness of Inland Empire, with its encyclopedic investigation into the spatial and textural possibilities of video as video, not a low-rent replacement for film: the distortion of objects looming in the foreground and evocative ambiguity of background shadows; the unique beauty of a video dissolve and the dissolution of forms in overexposed light. To dismiss the medium of Inland Empire is to miss the message. Just as Mulholland Drive can be read as a cautionary tale about the effect of movies on consciousness, Inland Empire speaks to the isolation and fragmentation of the post-cinema psyche, the splintering of self in the matrix of the Internet. As such, it may be the first movie masterpiece that doesnt properly belong in movie theaters.
Digital makes it what it is, says Lynch on the phone from his house in the Hollywood Hills. Back in L.A. from the Polish premiere of Inland Empire, the director spoke to me about digital filmmaking, cooking quinoa, and the beauty of the thing.
With traditional shooting on film, the equipment is so big and so heavy you need a large crew, he says. And the setup between shots takes a long timesometimes a very long time. With digital, you have much less downtimesometimes just moments. So what happens is, you stay in the scene, and there are less things around to break that scene. Youre in it-youre in it! But what precisely are we getting into with Inland Empire? The only explanation Lynch has offered to date is that its about "a woman in trouble." What kind of trouble? Well, you know, replies Lynch, I just say its about a woman in trouble. Thats it? Thats it. I cant really say, because it putrefies the experience. You see a thing, and that thing has been worked on for a long time until it feels correct as a whole. And then it needs to go out without any additional words. It doesnt do any good for the director to say this or thatit doesnt really change peoples opinion. They might come up with something far more interesting out of it.
Lynchs reticence to comment on the meaning of Inland Empire extends to the double-disc DVD package. The first simply contains the film as shown in the theaters, without a commentary track. The other disc is made up of nearly three hours of extras and features, including a 70-minute collection called More Things That Happened. Incorporated into the body of Inland Empire, this additional material would push the total running time to over four and half hours, but Lynch insists that they be considered apart from the main attraction.
There are things that dont go in a film that you can still love, he says, but the films got to stand on its own. Its got its own feel, and you dont want to fiddle with that. Anything else should be separate. So the film is the film, the other things have a bearing on film, but theyre just . . . ha!more things that happened.
And what about Ballerina, a study of a woman dancing to a piece of music composed by Lynch? Its another thingits just a thingbut to me, its a very beautiful thing. Indeedwhatever else Ballerina might be, it makes for a definitive rebuke to anyone who claims video incapable of rivaling the beauty of film. Composited from two different shots, sheathed in a smoke-like emanation, the movements of the dancer are as hypnotic as the infernal close-ups of Wild at Heart or the interstellar oddities of Eraserhead. Ballerina might be viewed as a preparatory sketch for the vast canvas of Inland Empire, the trace of an artist refining his technique. A painter before he was a filmmaker, Lynch devotes as much attention to the production design and set decoration of his movies as he does to the performances or cinematography, as can be seen in the montage of behind-the-scenes footage on disc two called Lynch 2. That seems to me the joy of it, he says of this artisanal care for details. I mean, the super fun of it!
Join My Voice Nation for free stuff, film info & more!