By Jared Chausow
By Katie Toth
By Elizabeth Flock
By Albert Samaha
By Anna Merlan
By Jon Campbell
By Jon Campbell
By Albert Samaha
The assertion, though, that New York isn't a college- football town is easily disproved any Saturday in the fall, as one watches the traffic fan out to Hofstra, West Point, Princeton, or many other small-college or Ivy League games within driving distancemost notably, in the last two years, to Rutgers Stadium in New Brunswick, New Jersey. For that matter, you could always see the passion that New Yorkers invest in college football simply by drifting into any neighborhood bar with a television set in Manhattan, Queens, or Brooklyn on a Saturday afternoon. Notre Dame's football team has always had far and away the biggest following of any school in the country, and its biggest fan base was and still is in the New York areathe term "subway alumni" was originally coined for them, not fans in Chicago.
Every football fan knows that Notre Dame was responsible for most of the great innovations that made football into what it is today; many don't know that this influence began years before Knute Rockne became a legendary coach. Team captain Rockne and quarterback Gus Dorais made the forward pass into a weapon that changed the way the game was played, leading to Notre Dame's 1913 victory over mighty Army at West Point.
Fewer still know that Notre Dame's football team might not have been around to make those changes had not Rutgers played Princeton on November 6, 1869, in what historians regard as the first intercollegiate football game ever played. (In the first clash of the two great football factories, Rutgers steamrolled Princeton 6-4 in a game that would have struck the modern observer as looking more like rugby than football.) That year, Rutgers probably could have beaten Notre Dame's football teamif they'd had one. That statement could not be made again for 138 years (though if the Scarlet Knights had played the Fighting Irish last year, I'd have picked them by about two points).
You can summarize nearly all the changes that have evolved in college football in the last 14 decades by the turnaround in the fortunes of these two schools.
Those old enough to remember the coming of Ara Parseghian to Notre Dame in 1964 have now seen the Fighting Irish rise and fall at least three times. The latest rise was in 2005, when Charlie Weis brought Notre Dame to a 9-3 mark after a combined 11-13 in the two previous years under Tyrone Willingham. The euphoria was short-lived. After a 10-2 regular season in 2006, the Irish had it demonstrated to them in no uncertain terms how far they were from being a national championship contender when they were crushed by Louisiana State in the Sugar Bowl 41-14. The previous year, Weis's team had been whipped by national championship contender Ohio State 34-20 in the Fiesta Bowl. In fact, it has now been 15 seasons since Notre Dame won a bowl game. The post-season losses over this period haven't even been closeonly one has been by fewer than 11 points, and Notre Dame's bowl losses since 1995 have been by an average of a staggering 18 points per game.
This is probably the worst start in Notre Dame historythree consecutive defeats by an eye-popping total of 102 points allowed to 13 scored. In three games, the Irish have yet to score so much as a single touchdown on offense. This time it doesn't look like Notre Dame's football program is going to rise again. In the past, Notre Dame coaches have always needed two or three years to establish themselves: Knute Rockne, Frank Leahy, Ara Parseghian, Dan Devine, and Lou Holtz all took three years to win their first national championship. The combined records of these five coaches in their third year is 50-2-1. This is Charlie Weis's third season.
Notre Dame's primary problem from 1997 through 2004 may or may not have been the fault of coaches Bob Davie and Ty Willingham (a combined 56-40), but they are certainly not now the fault of Charlie Weis, whose offensive genius helped produce three Super Bowls for the New England Patriots. The problem clearly is that the small school in the Midwest with high academic standards (or at least relatively high compared to most football powers) can no longer recruit blue-chip players. It's about time for Notre Dame to admit what it has been denying for some time now: that as a football school, it now ranks with its old service-academy foes, Army and Navy. And it needs to make the same admission that they made about four decades ago: It should face up to the fact that Notre Dame can no longer compete with the big boys and should begin to schedule mostly Division I-AA schools.