By Jared Chausow
By Katie Toth
By Elizabeth Flock
By Albert Samaha
By Anna Merlan
By Jon Campbell
By Jon Campbell
By Albert Samaha
Although Wikipedia defines "MILF" as a descriptor for women ages 35 to 50, in porno land, women cast as MILFs can be as young as 25. After all, once you've reached that age, you're usually on your way to being kicked to the curb by an industry obsessed with the Barely Legal set. Because of a demand for MILF porn, though, older performers are getting more work than ever before. (Some are first entering the biz at 35 and older.) The plots may be predictable and the dialogue cheesy, but it's a refreshing change to see women with sexual confidence and maturity on-screen.
At 48, Nina Hartley (nina.com) has made over 650 movies in her 28 years in porn. She says that after five years in the business, the amount of scenes she shot declined (typical for a female performer)but when she hit 40, there was a serious drop-off. However, in the past three years, she's seen a dramatic spike in her workload, primarily thanks to the rise of MILFs. "I am happy to be part of this new demographic," she says. "I have the opportunity to show that older women are sexy, and we are not giving up our sex lives." She believes that a good part of the MILF appeal isn't new: "Being taught by someone who knows what she is doingthe older-woman-as-sex-teacherhas always been a classic theme in porno. It just never had a name."
As Hartley points out, central to the typical MILF narrative is an age-play dynamic of older women and younger lovers. Porn is the place where our fantasieshowever dark, base, or politically incorrectcome to life. If porn takes the pulse of America's libido, if it's a window onto our collective desires, then sexy moms may finally be taking their place alongside 18-year-old cheerleaders as certified lust objects. Plus MILFs are not just a blue-movie niche marketthere's a larger MILF phenomenon out there that encourages women to embrace being motherly and sexy.
But let's take it one step further: Are mommies the new lust object? Other people's moms certainly are; that's usually what a MILF is. But could MILFs pave the way for other mommies, like the kind in mommy/boy and mommy/girl fantasy role-play, where the mommy is much closer to home? Could Mommy finally step out of the shadow of Daddy?
Now I'm not just talking about porn. In s&m, queer culture, and fantasy role-play, "Daddy" is one of the most popular archetypes around. Search queer or kinky personals for the word daddy, and you'll have plenty of potential dates to choose from. There's a level of comfort and familiarity with daddy play, which is not so much about eroticizing incest as it is creating a specific kind of dominant/submissive dynamic, where "masters" are drill sergeants and "daddies" are loving mentors. There are way more self-identified daddiesboth male and femalethan mommies in those communities. Why?
Our love/lust for Daddy runs deep. If Freudians and other psychologists put on their thinking caps and leather chaps for a moment, they'd conclude that for gay men and straight women alike, Father was the first object of affection; thus, Daddy is an instinctual desire from childhood. The desire to be a daddy or have a daddy is deeply rooted in the psychodynamics of the family. If you grew up with an emotionally or physically distant dad or another kind of unavailable father, his absence can create a longing to bond and connect with Daddy.
In theory, Mommy may have different qualities and a unique history compared to Daddy, but she's just as significant a figure (if not actually more significant) in everyone's life. No matter what your sexual orientation is, Mommy is every child's first love, first object of devotion, and the center of its universe. We are often at our most vulnerable and needy with our mothers. It's taboo to openly admit that we use sexual fantasy to work through our personal issues, to rewrite our family dynamics, and to heal broken relationshipsbut we do. So why do so many choose to do all that with Daddy? It can't be that we've resolved all our issues with Mommy. Is she too intimate, too strong, too powerful an archetype to play with, to embody, to desire?
One reason for all the missing mommies could be a misogynist double standard at work. Daddy's reign as top erotic role choice reflects a tendency not only to eroticize the father (and all the things he represents), but to empower him over the motherthe paternal as powerful and seductive, the maternal as meek, less desirable, and desexualized. It's an interesting metaphor in the context of parenting roles in American society: Mommy does all the hard work, and Daddy gets all the glory. Also, when it's a mommy/boy or mommy/girl dynamic, a female person (or persona) is the one in chargeand, for some, dominant women are still far more difficult to embrace than dominant men. There used to be some mommy play, both subtle and overt, on the site of Women Who Administer Punishment (a/k/a WHAP), a magazine dedicated to fem doms and spanking. Interestingly, now that the site no longer exists, it redirects to one called Humiliatrix.com. When it comes to female dominants, we seem to be more comfortable with ball-busting bitches than we are with nurturing caretakers. That's the great thing about a mommy: She can be a gentle, loving mentor or a stern spank-you-over-her-knee disciplinarian. Mommy's complex like that. So isn't it about time that Mommy got her moment in the spotlight?
Please visit Puckerup.com.