Top

news

Stories

 

Confronting Joe McCarthy, Then and Now

The recent death of a former Air Force officer brings back a familiar fight for freedom

One of the rewards of being a reporter is getting to know people you'd normally not be able to meet. And sometimes, after writing stories on them, the relationship continues. That's how I became friends with Malcolm X, John Cardinal O'Connor, Justice William Brennan—and Fred Friendly, my mentor on the First Amendment. He and Edward R. Murrow ended Joe McCarthy's reign of fear, and Fred later developed a way to shine a constitutional light on Joe McCarthy's hunt for domestic terrorism suspects.

Fred Friendly died in 1998 at the age of 82, but he was back in the news in November in the obituaries of a man that he and Murrow "rescued" from McCarthy. (Friendly produced Murrow's See It Now TV series.)

To many younger Americans, McCarthy—the destroyer of the lives of "subversive unAmericans"—may be a dim figure, but since we are again living in a "culture of fear," the story of how the sword of the First Amendment cut him down is acutely contemporary.

On November 19, Milo Radulovich died. Radulovich's story was told in the 2005 movie Goodnight, and Good Luck, in which George Clooney played Fred Friendly.

In 1953, Radulovich, an Air Force Reserve lieutenant, was considered a security risk because his father and sister were supposedly Communist sympathizers. In October of that year, Murrow and Friendly—on CBS's See It Now—broadcast the first direct, documented attack on the "guilt by association" tactics of McCarthy.

As The New York Times's Douglas Martin reported in his November 21 obituary of Radulovich, since Alcoa, the sponsor of See It Now, had contracts with the military, jittery CBS brass refused to promote the program, so Fred and Murrow took it upon themselves to pay $1,500 for an ad in the Times.

Five weeks after that broadcast, Radulovich was reinstated by the secretary of the Air Force. "[It was] the first time," Fred Friendly says, "any of us appreciated the power of television." In 1998, the state of Michigan commemorated that stinging documentary with a plaque: "It is generally believed that the program was the beginning of the end for the McCarthy era."

Three months after the Radulovich program, See It Now took on the high-riding Joe McCarthy himself. I watched that show with special interest because I figured that because of the anti- McCarthy petitions I'd signed and some radio programs I'd done in Boston, I might eventually get summoned to meet the arch-patriot himself.

But after the See It Now exposure of the worst Red Scare since the 1920's, McCarthy—following a turbulent Senate investigation—was censured by the entire Senate in December 1954. A heavy drinker in his prime, McCarthy, increasingly sodden, died in 1957.

Fred Friendly went on to become the president of CBS News, but two years later he walked out of the building—and his job—in fury. On that day, Democratic Senator William Fulbright was to chair the first committee investigation of the U.S. involvement in Vietnam. Friendly scheduled it, but his bosses had aired reruns of I Love Lucyinstead.

Fred embodied integrity—and no one ever questioned it. From then on, he became a professor of journalism at Columbia University and embarked on a mission to challenge Americans and others around the world to actually think for themselves on deeply controversial issues. "Television," he told me, "began as a way to educate people, not just entertain them."

Before retiring in 1993, he produced 600 more seminars, as he called them, with more than 70 of them on American public television. The one with the most impact was a continually exciting 13-week series, The Constitution: That Delicate Balance—on which Supreme Court justices, journalists, prosecutors, defense attorneys, legislators, law professors, police commissioners, scientists, and a range of other advocates jousted, sometimes very forcefully.

On camera, Fred would introduce each program, saying: "Our job is not to make up anyone's mind, but to open minds—to make the agony of decision-making so intense that you can escape only by thinking."

He invited me to be a part of several of those tournaments. During one, there I was—without a law degree—arguing with Justice Antonin Scalia. (To paraphrase from a nursery rhyme from my childhood: "A cat can disagree with a king.")

Anthony Lewis, the former New York Times civil-liberties columnist—sorely missed on those pages these days—said then: "Fred has found a way to use [television] that nobody else has."

I wish Fred were here to read Lewis's new book, Freedom for the Thought That We Hate (Basic Books), available in January, the most riveting history of the First Amendment that I've ever read—including those I've written. The book strengthens Fred's legacy, and I've suggested to the publisher that it be made available to schools, starting with secondary schools, because the No Child Left Behind Act leaves no room for teaching children who we are as Americans.

Brian Lamb—whose C-SPAN is the most consistent educational tool on self-government that Americans have—could also build on Fred's foundation of active Americanism by producing his version of The Constitution: That Delicate Balance at a time in our history when that source of our liberties—very much including the separation of powers—has never been more endangered.

1 | 2 | Next Page >>
 
  • Syd Bloom 12/28/2007 10:30:00 PM

    There is not one single case where an American citizen has been denied a civil iberty due to the Bush admin or the Patriot Act. Not one. The ONLY documented case of loss of liberty and denial of constitutional rights have been related to Democrat Liberal special interests groups blocking the right of people to vote. Where and when? Massachusetts 2000, 2004 and again in 2006 when an activist group used the nearly 100% democrat controlled commonwealth government to block a constitutionally protected vote from making it onto the public ballot in direct violation of the law and the commonwealth's constitution. That is just one example. Concrete. Documented and proven. Unlike the caterwaling of the stalinists in our midst.

  • StasiSam 12/26/2007 5:48:00 AM

    This crap has never stopped: http://www.publiceye.org/huntred/Hunt_For_Red_Menace-02.html "Inside the FBI there developed a core group of agents with authoritarian tendencies who adopt the theories, and sometimes the practices, of the the paranoid nativist right-wing. This view was institutionalized while Hoover was FBI director, and a self- perpetuating network carries on the tradition today following his death." ... and continues: http://www.freedomfchs.com/unwarranted_surveillance.pdf

  • Toby 12/21/2007 8:57:00 AM

    What people think "is bein' takin' away from us" today is nuthin' compared to wha' we'll be livin' in the next generation...and all fur the survival of the American nation. Good reason. McCarthy was crude, but he wasn't wrong, as history has proven, even if its still popular fir people to still deny.

  • serena1313 12/20/2007 1:41:00 PM

    The phrase "we're at war" has led to a brutal assault on America's constitutional democracy. While it has been used as an excuse to suspend justice, the rule of law, moral principles and human decency it has also led to the government's attempts to control the flow of information which is succeeding. Democracy cannot exist with an uniformed citizenry. Theretofore it comes as no surprise that Americans have no idea to what extent Bush & Cheney have fundamentally changed our system of government. The slow architectural deconstruction of the Constitution's checks-and-balances has been instrumental for constructing an impenetrable firewall around the executive. Claiming the right to wiretap without a warrant Bush has been less than forthcoming with the public about the data mining programmes. In the name of combating terrorism "guilt by association" during the McCarthy era will look like a cakewalk in comparison to where we appear to be headed. The war paradigm is a false narrative, but central for aggrandizing unaccountable presidential power. With unchecked powers, control of information and a complicit media Bush re-shaped the executive into an imperial presidency and rules by fiat. And Americans are none the wiser. Consequently many Americans unwittingly and unknowingly accepted the deconstruction of democratic institutions without much resistance because we are told "we are at war."

 

Most Popular Stories


Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy