-
Hilary 09/24/2010 8:53:00 PM
What a sad story! It's amazing that the Pentagon was trying to cover it up! That is awful!
www.thedeepwaterproject.com
-
David Marshall 07/16/2010 10:56:00 PM
KO BY FERES!
The U.S. Supreme Court’s 1987 STANLEY [3] “to harm” experiment is approved by the U.S. Supreme Court’s 1950 FERES [1] ‘DOD can do no wrong’ Doctrine. This case is one of the U.S. Senate’s 1994 “During the last 50 years, hundreds of thousands of military personnel” were subjected to “experiments that were designed to harm”.[8] It is a dereliction of duty in direct disobedience of the DOD Secretary's 26 February 1953 NO non-consensual, human experiments.[2] In 2010, after honorable service the U.S. Congress still has not given back to veterans those rights that convicted rapists and murderers keep![6]
The "Veterans Right to Know Act" to establish the Veterans' Right to Know Commission was proposed in the 2005 and H.R. 4259 [109th] 2006 Congress.[9] A veteran's right to get the “to harm” needed for treatment evidence never became law.
"IT WAS NECESSARY "TO CONCEAL THESE ACTIVITIES FROM THE AMERICAN PUBLIC IN GENERAL," BECAUSE PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE OF THE" UNETHICAL AND ILLICIT ACTIVITIES WOULD HAVE SERIOUS REPERCUSSIONS IN POLITICAL AND DIPLOMATIC CIRCLES AND WOULD BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE ACCOMPLISHMENT OF ITS MISSION." See [Footnote 2/4] Page 483 U.S. 709 U.S. Supreme Court 1987 STANLEY military biomedical experimentation case. [3]
After the 1987 STANLEY, Congress passed the 1988 Veterans’ Judicial Review Act (VJRA).[4] Established was the Legislative, Article I severely restricted, U.S. Court of Veterans Appeals. Its Chief Judge stated, "The Court simply identifies error made below by a failure to adhere, in individual cases, to the Constitution, statutes, and regulations which themselves reflect policy -- policy freely ignored by many initial adjudicators whose attitude is, "I haven't been told by my boss to change. If you don't like it -- appeal it."[7] Congress dictated that, "The court may not review the schedule of ratings for disabilities or the policies underlying the schedule."[4] Given to the Secretary of the DVA is the Judicial Branch’s final authority on "the policies underlying the schedule" questions of law![5] Thereby, the withheld needed for treatment evidence and the underlying “experiments that were designed to harm” cause may not be addressed!
Each "to harm" experimentation project completes a Research and Development (R&D) process. Prior R&D is reviewed. The resulting Scope of Work defines what each experiment is "designed" to accomplish. The how, where, when and who is identified. The conducted RESEARCHED cause and effects are closely followed and recorded. From the results are DEVELOPED safe production, use, victim treatment and protection. Accordingly, at the time known are the “designed to harm” experimentation resultant disabilities with their identifying symptoms.
DESPITE THE EFFORTS OF SOME, WITH THE U. S. CONGRESS’S NOW 66 YEAR BEHAVIOR [8], DO NOT THE EXPERIMENTS CONTINUE UNDER THE COVER OF OUR PRESENT WARS?
REFERENCES:
[1] 1950 - Feres v. United States, 340 U.S. 135, 146 (1950). http://supreme.justia.com/us/340/135/case.html
[2] 1953 - DOD Secretary's 26 February 1953 NO non-consensual, human experiment’s Memo pages 343-345. George J. Annas and Michael A. Grodin, "The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code; Human Rights in Human Experimentation” (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992).
[3] 1987 - U.S. SUPREME COURT, JUNE 25, 1987, U.S. V. STANLEY , 107 S. CT.. 3054 (VOLUME 483 U.S., SECTION 669, PAGES 699 TO 710). http://supreme.justia.com/us/483/669/case.html
[4] 1988 - Veterans’ Judicial Review Act (VJRA), Pub. L. No. 100-687, Div. A, 102 Stat. 4105 (8 December 1988) DVA-Chapter 4 and http://law.jrank.org/pages/6784/Federal-Courts-Court-Appeals-Veterans-Claims.html#ixzz0MIKbF8ND
[5] "United States Code (USC) Title 38, 511. Decisions of the Secretary; finality." US CODE: Title 38511. Decisions of the Secretary; finality.
[6] 1994 - U.S. State Dept., "U.S. Report under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights July 1994, Article 7 - Freedom from Torture, or Cruel, Inhuman
or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.” Electronic Research Collections (ERC)
[7] 1994 - Chief Judge and colleague statements, Court of Veterans Appeals, Annual Judicial Conference, Fort Meyer, VA., 17 & 18 October 1994. Chief Judge Frank Nebeker's Statement STATE OF COURT - - - URL: http://www.firebase.net/state_of_court_brief.htm
[8] 1994 - December 8, 1994 REPORT 103-97 "Is Military Research Hazardous to Veterans' Health? Lessons Spanning Half a Century." Hearings Before the U.S. Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs, 103rd Congress 2nd Session.
[9] 2005 & 2006 - "Veterans Right to Know Act" to establish the Veterans' Right to Know Commission was proposed in the 2005 and H.R. 4259 [109th] 2006 Congress. H. R. 4259.
-
pete salinas 09/03/2008 1:03:00 PM
i knew it was a woman who screwed up and got somebody killed!!! she has to live with the fact that because of her incompitence , she caused another soldier to die!!!!! all because of political correctiveness!!!!!!!she deserves to be raped !!!! but being a militant dike bitch probably got her a promotion instead.
-
Ed Fremer 08/22/2008 6:49:00 AM
Harvey, This is an accident that could have been avoided. It occurred because of carelessness and not following Army procedure. I have a copy of the accident report. The Army admits negligence. Safety was not a priority in this accident. If anyone wants a copy of the accident report Email me at EFremer@aol.com
My son was the victim of this careless accident, Not the cause. If you do a Google or Yahoo search for Feres Doctrine or Feres Doctrine Petition. You find countless deaths due to stupid accidents like this one. Get the facts straight. How many soldiers are killed or disabled because a lot of people in the armed forces don't know what they are doing?
Ed Fremer
-
Harvey 08/21/2008 6:42:00 AM
This was an accident that could have happened anywhere, just so happens that it happened at an Army base so most of you just assume that the military is at fault. The military is by it's very duty a dangerous profession, and I am positive that everyone in the chain of command did their best to have a safe and successful training mission. As an NCO in a Army unit I know that first and foremost safety is a priority, but the unforeseen often happens.
As for those who elude to the belief that the 'not so best and brightest' are the only saps who join the military, 'that the military is only for the poor and uneducated.'
I take this with great offense! Most of you know nothing of the commitment or the patriotism of our young men and women in uniform, and due to your misguided perceptions of the world never will understand why someone willingly joins the service!
I [and many like me] joined the military to have a chance at something, as well as to serve our nation. If you actually understood the freedoms you take so lightly were payed for by the sacrifices of others, you might understand...but I doubt it!
"We the willing, serving those who don't care!"
-
Big Bill 08/18/2008 5:24:00 PM
We are increasingly seeing accidents like these as the Army accepts more and more people with a less than 90 IQ. Put a bunch of them together, give them a half-dangerous task to do, and they kill themselves or the soldier next to them. They lack the sense to protect themselves or react in high-stress situations.
Any kid who takes "months" with private tutoring (!) to pass the GED should be fixing flat tires or carpentering for a living. He should not be in the military.
The problem is that rich folks have imported millions of ignorant Mexicans to take those jobs-for-dummies that used to go to American dummies like Michael. They did it for the reasons they always do it: because the Michael Fremers of our country just aren't lickspittle enough, won't grovel like a Oaxaqueno, and won't happily work for ignorant peasant wages.
Time to close the borders, cut off the supply of surplus labor the capitalist use to keep American citizens down and get wages up for the Michael Fremers of this world so they don't have to go do dangerous things they are not mentally equipped to handle.
-
Ed Fremer 08/07/2008 9:32:00 PM
Please sign the petition below as the Feres Doctrine needs to be over turned. If effects countless serviceman and families of serviceman. If you do a google or Yahoo search you will see examples of this.
http://www.petitiononline.com/fd1950/petition.html
Thanks,
Ed Fremer
-
Ed Fremer 08/07/2008 7:58:00 PM
Please sign the petition below as the Feres Doctrine needs to be over turned. If effects countless serviceman and families of serviceman. If you do a google or Yahoo search you will see examples of this.
http://www.petitiononline.com/fd1950/petition.html
Thanks,
Ed Fremer
-
EdFremer 08/07/2008 7:35:00 PM
Please go to this link and sign the Petition. The feres act is wrong and needs to be overturned. If you do a Yahoo or Google search. you will find a lot of reasons why this law needs to be changed. There are countless stories of servicemen being hurt or killed and they or their familes can not do anything.
http://www.petitiononline.com/fd1950/petition.html
Thanks,
Ed Fremer
-
Paul B 08/01/2008 11:45:00 AM
i hope he wins that lawsuit. army is dumb unless you really have no purpose then it's perfect.
-
Johnson 08/01/2008 7:55:00 AM
WTF, Camila??
-
Donna 08/01/2008 7:22:00 AM
My comment is to Camila, correct me if I'm wrong but are you stating that a stable home is when both parents are equally attentive? Well my home is a stable home with one very attentive parent. My children are well behaved, do well in school and are not becoming wayward. To think that I should not have had children because my marrige ended in a divorce(therefore my home is not stable) is ridiculous. I happen to know Eddie Fremer and trust me his son was not left alone at 5. He is a great father and was there for him. He is not blaming himself for the trouble his son got into because he knows he gave 110 percent of himself. Yes in high school, Michael got involved with the wrong crowd and he went down the wrong path. As parents we all pray our children won't go down this path, but as we all know no matter what we do some children do go down this path and guess what it even happens in households where there are two equally attentive parents. In raising children there are many factors that contribute to how your children will turn out and the fact that there is one parent does not mean your child is doomed for life!!!!!
-
Camila 07/31/2008 9:24:00 PM
We need to stop having children if we are not going to have stable homes for them to live out their lives with equally attentive parents who notice the small things in their children. Some kids need extra attention or direction and the only way to help them from becoming wayward is to stop 'loving ourselves and our predicaments (whose going to pay the bills? where are we going to live?) and start trusting that as long as our kids are near us, know they are loved, we trust them and they know we put them first, they will not make decisions that will horrendously affect them later. We are supposed to pave the way for our kids, not leave them alone (at five!) to figure out the world. Don't blame yourself if you fall in this category, just learn not to do it again and maybe you can make a difference in another child's life. Become a mentor.
