Top

news

Stories

 

The Shame of Speaker Shelly Silver's Resistance to Seward Park Redevelopment

A stretch of the Lower East Side stands desolate and empty after 'urban renewal,' thanks to the Assembly Speaker

A lawsuit alleging discrimination by the co-ops lingered in federal court for years before a settlement opened the rolls in the late 1980s. The Riveras and other former residents kept waiting. "We always had that dream that the neighborhood would come back," said Lillian Rivera.

Every city administration has made a stab at resolving the situation. Back in April 1980, Ed Koch proposed a shopping center, 150 units of housing for senior citizens, and a modest 100 apartments for low-income families. A near-riot ensued at the old Board of Estimate. Residents of Grand Street shouted down speakers from north of Delancey. Taunts of "racist" and "criminal" flew. Andrew Stein, then Manhattan borough president, shot down the plan: "Every experience with low-income housing," he said, playing to opponents, "shows it creates crime and social problems."

Silver was then a two-term assemblyman from the co-ops. The Rivera sisters recall him as a bright young lawyer. Nilda Rivera, a social worker at Gouverneur Hospital on Madison Street, found him "very helpful with our clients." But he went stony deaf when the subject of Seward Park arose.

"I am so disappointed in him," said Lillian Rivera. A couple years ago, the Bloomberg administration floated its own modest proposal, calling for a mix of low- and middle-income housing, along with more units for senior citizens. This one never made it to City Hall. Administration officials quietly dropped the plan after another raucous hearing, this one at a local community-board meeting. Lillian Rivera, a retired public-school teacher, tried to speak over the shouting: "These people were saying the new housing would devalue their property. I said, 'I was here before you were. I was your neighbor, remember? You'd see me in the supermarket? Now, all of a sudden, I'm not good enough to come back to my own neighborhood?' They booed me off the stage, but at least I got my say."

These days, the Bloomberg administration lapses into cautious bureaucrat-speak when pressed about the site: "There is a long history of underdevelopment, with great community interest," says a spokeswoman. "The city is interested in re-engaging and discussion about future uses. The community will be fully involved in any dialogue."

Pushing hardest for that discussion is a group calling itself the Seward Park Area Redevelopment Coalition. A year ago, Harriet Cohen, the group's chairwoman, wrote Silver requesting a meeting. "We never heard back," says Cohen.

<< Previous Page | 1 | 2
 
  • David 08/20/2008 2:01:00 AM

    (Sorry about the double post) We also know that Sheldon Silver has catered to constituents that oppose affordable housing for the wrong reasons: myths about lower properties values (disproved by dozens of studies), xenophobia and racism. Shelly knows that those living in affordable housing won't automatically be his voters, and if his votes go down (even if they don't threaten to oust him), he risks losing the precious Speaker position.

  • David 08/20/2008 1:59:00 AM

    The Robbins piece wasn't perfect, but we do know a few things: tenements on the site were razed 40 years ago, displacing hundreds of residents; the land is owned by EDC and so should be used for a public use; the Lower East Side is increasingly expensive. Yes, "projects" exist in the area, but low income housing produced by private developers looks nothing like NYCHA housing that was built in the 50s and 60s. And, in fact, it caters to a higher-income population that the projects. Generally, low-income housing assists those at 60 or 80% of the area median income, which in NYC's case, means working class, including teachers, firefighters, and police. Odds are the land would also include some market-rate housing to bolster the tax base and the local businesses. Right now, the businesses get the benefit of FREE parking on land that could have been used much more effectively, not to mention legally and morally, as mixed-income housing. Check out www.housingguy.blogspot.com for more housing insights.

  • David 08/20/2008 1:57:00 AM

    The Robbins piece wasn't perfect, but we do know a few things: tenements on the site were razed 40 years ago, displacing hundreds of residents; the land is owned by EDC and so should be used for a public use; the Lower East Side is increasingly expensive. Yes, "projects" exist in the area, but low income housing produced by private developers looks nothing like NYCHA housing that was built in the 50s and 60s. And, in fact, it caters to a higher-income population that the projects. Generally, low-income housing assists those at 60 or 80% of the area median income, which in NYC's case, means working class, including teachers, firefighters, and police. Odds are the land would also include some market-rate housing to bolster the tax base and the local businesses. Right now, the businesses get the benefit of FREE parking on land that could have been used much more effectively, not to mention legally and morally, as mixed-income housing. Check out www.housingguy.blogspot.com for more housing insights.

  • gaetano catelli 08/15/2008 2:06:00 PM

    i missed the part that explains what any of this sorry situation has to do with Sheldon Silver?

  • pork 08/15/2008 1:57:00 AM

    when will they vote this bum out of office? when will we have state level term limits?

 

Most Popular Stories


Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy