Top

film

Stories

 

Marc Forster Has a License to Confuse and Bore in Quantum of Solace

Neither shaken nor stirred

Those of us who adored Casino Royale, the 2006 reboot of the haggard, self-parodic James Bond franchise, had some trouble trying to decide where to place it among the series' finest. Was it better than Goldfinger? Probably not, but close. The Spy Who Loved Me? Maybe so. From Russia With Love? Nope—missed it by this much, to quote another secret agent. Granted, it's all shades of bullet-gray when it comes to Bond, historically riddled with silly, soporific misfires that looked the same regardless of who wore the tux and gulped the gin and gave the girl one last gasp before she drew her last breath.

Barrel-bottom Bond
Karen Ballard
Barrel-bottom Bond

But Casino Royale was a welcome break with a wearying tradition: It was the first James Bond movie since On Her Majesty's Secret Service to portray 007 as something more than a suave, Kennedy-era caricature—a handsome head perched upon a tailored suit and a martini glass. Daniel Craig, an art-house bombshell if there is such a thing, brought to Bond warmth, humanity, and, above all, gives-a-damn decency heretofore lacking since George Lazenby's sole stint as Connery's stand-in. More than just a good time spent riding shotgun in a tricked-out ride with a bad boy, Casino Royale was a love story masquerading as a spy thriller, with Bond falling for his collaborator and eventual betrayer, Vesper Lynd (Eva Green), who was working for . . . ?

That, alas, is the question allegedly answered by Quantum of Solace, which takes its title from an inconsequential Ian Fleming short story and is the first Bond movie to serve as a direct sequel. Allegedly, because Craig's second outing as Bond is as frustrating, sloppy, and brusque as its predecessor was engaging, sleek, and unhurried. At 106 minutes, it's the shortest of the Bond films, but it feels like one of the longest as it bounces hither and yon only to wind up stranded in a Bolivian desert, where baddie Dominic Greene (The Diving Bell and the Butterfly's Mathieu Amalric) is sucking the sand dry of its underwater river. Yawn. Used to be, Bond villains were larger-than-life Evil Geniuses who at least had Grand Aspirations to take over the world, bwah-haw-haw. Now, the bad guy's just a phony environmentalist with a thing for deposed dictators and dry wells.

At least, that's what Quantum of Solace seems to be about, though most of the time it's simply too hard to tell—or too pointless to care about—courtesy of the haphazard direction of Marc Forster, who demonstrates by negative example why Bond movies are best served by journeymen with something to prove rather than would-be A-listers slumming it. From its very first moments—we enter the film mid–car chase—Quantum is a spastic, indecipherable, unholy, and altogether unwatchable mess. Between swerves and smashes, we simply have no idea who's doing what to whom, where they're doing it, or why. What's meant to be kinetic and cathartic serves only to disorient, to keep the audience at a head-scratching distance.

It's as though Forster (Monster's Ball, Finding Neverland) and his two editors (longtime collaborator Matt Cheese and, get this, Get Smart and Bourne Supremacy vet Richard Pearson) filmed Quantum on a roller coaster and cut the movie with a food processor set on "indecipherable." Consider the scene, only moments after the car chase, where Bond and M (Judi Dench, even more disagreeable than she was in Casino Royale) question the mysterious Mr. White (Jesper Christensen, reprising his role from the previous film) about his role in Vesper's double-cross and death. The interrogation, but of course, turns into a shoot-out, with Bond chasing the assassin across rooftops and through broken glass ceilings—a reprise of Casino Royale's thrilling parkour sequence, perhaps the franchise's singular Great Moment. But Forster, whose biggest action sequence to date involved Halle Berry and Billy Bob Thornton getting it on, interrupts the action with needless, irritating cutaways to inconsequential doings (dunno what, can't say, wouldn't matter anyway) elsewhere that render the entire scene a confounding, alienating muddle. Which is to say nothing of the klutzy opera-house shoot-out stolen from The Godfather: Part III only moments later.

Written by Neil Purvis and Robert Wade (whose association with Bond dates back to 1999's The World Is Not Enough—yes, the one with Denise Richards) and Casino Royale pinch hitter Paul Haggis, Quantum of Solace may ultimately prove Bond's worst enemy to date. It's both frantic and boring, a surprising and wholly unnecessary attempt to gin up the revived franchise by turning Bond into Bourne. If Bond is to bound again (which, given the box-office tracking for Quantum, is all but assured), it will have to be with a different director; Forster has done the seemingly impossible to this director-proof series, treating Bond with such disdain as to render him pointless in his own movie.

Craig, stripped naked (literally) and revealed as little more than a "maladjusted young man" in Casino Royale, is still a rookie making clumsy mistakes here, but what seemed human in the relaunching already feels stale the second go-round. Bond does little more than sulk through the picture—Forster doesn't allow him so much as a grin—while even Jeffrey Wright, back as CIA ally and comic relief Felix Leiter, seethes his way though his handful of scenes. (He's more menacing toward Bond than Amalric, a non-entity.) If nothing else, there's no need to worry about where Quantum of Solace fits in the Bond pantheon—it's easily one of the worst.

 
  • Allen 06/14/2010 10:44:00 PM

    Late to this party, I know, but that's partially because bad reviews kept me away from this movie until recently. Like another person noted here, this movie rewards careful viewing and fares much better the second time. Quantum is an excellent film. Bond movies often have very complex plots but they are typically drawn out to well over two hours, making them a bit easier to follow. The pace of Quantum can make it tougher to follow, but I honesty believe that nearly every bad review I've read can be chalked up to a failure on the part of the reviewer to pick up on the plot twists. It's a polarizing film; some writers consider it to be among the very best Bond films. Count me amont them. I just hope the generally negative reception doesn't cause Craig et al to veer off course.

  • Michael 01/30/2010 10:11:00 PM

    I did find the film confusing the first time I saw it, but I just watched it again and it is awesome. Perhaps even better than Casino Royal, and easily one of the very best Bond films ever. I really don't understand the negative reviews, especially how some claim they had difficulty following what was happening. It's more artistic than many Bond films (beautiful cinematography), and has great dialogue and action (not too over the top). I can't wait for the next in the series!

  • chuck lewis 12/05/2009 2:15:00 AM

    Well said! I couldn't agree more. The film was utterly ludicrous, incomprehensible both in plot and in 'action' sequences. What on earth did Foster think he was doing? It was like a bad mix of music video and video game complete with unwatchable CTG. The opening sequence (car chase) was ridiculous. I couldn't believe it was so badly shot and edited. It made no sense at all. It was a totally horrible waste of money and talent (Foster's as well as Craig's).

  • Richard S 12/11/2008 3:28:00 AM

    Loved the review - absolutely spot on. QoS isn't just the worst Bond film of all time (I couldn't believe anyone could do worse than Die Another Day), it's a one of the worst films of the year full stop. The frantic cuts were just nauseating rather than exciting - I started counting how long any scene lasted and I got to about 2-3 seconds. And that felt like watching Lawrence of Arabia! QoS had nothing in common with any Bond film - it abandoned everything Bond has stood for (basically, escapist entertainment) and tried to turn the character into Rambo in a suit. No megalomanic baddie, no grand lair, no gadgets, no babes to sleep with and no fun. An utterly dreadful film.

  • Eugene 11/22/2008 11:03:00 PM

    Worst Bond movie. The estimated 67-69% drop on the second Friday from the opening Friday proves that Quantum Of Solace is getting bad word of mouth. So, those of you that are like me and hated this so-called Bond movie, can take solace in the fact that the majority of people hate this movie. When I saw the numbers this morning, I was ecstatic. I was hoping that this movie will drop drastically so that we can get back to the Bond we all enjoyed. Yes, I know this is the "biggest Bond" ever. Overseas it's breaking all kinds of records. But hopefully the bad word of mouth spreads over there as well. Overall, the drop from first weekend to second weekend will probably be around 60%. That is the biggest drop ever for a Bond movie (as far as I could find with some research). I have to admit, however, that most of the recent Bond movies premiered the weekend before the Thanksgiving weekend, so the second weekend drop was always softened by having that five day holiday. Still, a 60% drop would put this Jason Bourne movie...Uh, sorry, James Bond movie, right around $110 million after 10 days, which is tracking ahead of other Bond movies. And with probably only a 35% drop or so next weekend with Thanksgiving, it should be around $145-$160 million after 17 days. This will still be the biggest grossing Bond movie domestically, but it will probably not make it to $200 million. With the bad word of mouth, I could see this movie ending up with right around $190 million, unless the studio holds on until it makes it to $200 million. If it only makes it to $190 million, it would still only be the 7th highest attended Bond movie ever. Taking ticket price inflation into account, it would trail Thunderball ($529 million with ticket price infaltion), Goldfinger ($469 million), You Only Live Twice ($254 million), Moonraker ($198 million), Die Another Day ($195 million) and Tomorrow Never Dies ($190.5 million). This means that all six of those movies sold more tickets than Quantum Of Solace. Yes, that also means that two of Pierce Brosnan's Bond movies did better than Solace. And unless there are some drastic changes made to this current incarnation of Bond, Craig will never reach the top five of most attended Bond films. And with the $200 million plus price tag, this is also the most expensive Bond film made (I'm still trying to figure out what they used all of that money on...It can't be on that unimpressive set at the end of the movie...Maybe it was used to make Craig's eyes look a brighter blue?). Ok, let me just say, I have nothing against Daniel Craig. I really enjoyed Casino Royale, and I think that he makes a great Bond. But it's the overall production value, the lack of an interesting villain, the boring action and the bad direction...And don't even get me started on that new title song...Pure crap! Anyway, here's to hoping that Quantum drops bigger and bigger with each passing day.

  • evilqual 11/22/2008 2:49:00 PM

    you consider yourself to be quality critic, yet you choose to review a movie from a series you dislike immensely... how can we possibly expect you to give a reasonable and measured review? this would be like a orthodox classical musician reviewing rap! it is easy to slander something without trying to take on such a task, so next time you write a review, consider how hard it is to create such a movie before hand.

  • Ben 11/16/2008 3:26:00 PM

    You're a retard. Seriously. Casino Royale was better than Quantum, but still it's a decent movie. You aren't a critic, you're a laughter.

  • Drizzt 11/14/2008 11:43:00 AM

    you gave this a 1 out 10 on metacritic. or thats what it says... really? i mean a one out of ten?

  • SLCBOND 11/13/2008 11:02:00 AM

    All I have to say is this review does have some valid points. Yeah, I agree that he doesn't have all of his facts straight. But I am a huge Bond fan and have grown up on Bond. I completely agree that Marc Foster's directing was crap. He is completely right for that fact saying that after an action sequence you look back thinking WTF just happened? I have to say I have very mixed feeling on this movie. I love Daniel Craig as Bond he is awesome the story was a little week but 50,000 times better than "Licence to Kill" and like I said before the directing was crap!

  • SLCBOND 11/13/2008 11:02:00 AM

    All I have to say is this review does have some valid points. Yeah, I agree that he doesn't have all of his facts straight. But I am a huge Bond fan and have grown up on Bond. I completely agree that Marc Foster's directing was crap. He is completely right for that fact saying that after an action sequence you look back thinking WTF just happened? I have to say I have very mixed feeling on this movie. I love Daniel Craig as Bond he is awesome the story was a little week but 50,000 times better than "Licence to Kill" and like I said before the directing was crap!

  • Sean 11/13/2008 4:01:00 AM

    Village voice my ass, more like village idiot. This movie was nothing less than the best movie of 2008!

  • jason 11/13/2008 12:21:00 AM

    Bond films NOT named after Ian Fleming novels: LICENSE TO KILL GOLDENEYE TOMORROW NEVER DIES THE WORLD IS NOT ENOUGH DIE ANOTHER DAY Also "...gulps the gin" - That would be vodka as in VODKA martini, shaken not stirred.

  • ObamaBiden08 11/12/2008 11:13:00 PM

    You are as ignorant in this review as you are stupid. All I learned is that you didn't like the Bourne series (and if you did you are a massive hypocrite for not liking this film) and you don't know anything about the history of Bond. There are more mistakes in this review and movies in the series. Jackass.

  • Alex Antonetz 11/12/2008 10:36:00 PM

    Lots of mistakes here... first off, this is NOT the first Bond film not named after a Fleming work. Also, Felix Leiter doesn't work for the FBI but rather the CIA. Pretty crap review, to be honest. Just another reviewer who expects Bond to be big and brash instead of dark and faithful to the novels.

  • Nathan 11/12/2008 9:56:00 PM

    This is not the first Bond movie not named after an Ian Fleming novel (Licence to Kill, Goldeneye, The World is Not Enough, etc.). It's not the first to be named after a short story either (Octopussy, The Living Daylights).

 

Find A Film

for free stuff, film info & more!

Find A Coupon

Popular Coupons

Box Office

  1. Chronicle (2012/ I), 22.0 mil, 22.0 mil
  2. The Woman in Black, 20.9 mil, 20.9 mil
  3. The Grey, 9.3 mil, 34.6 mil
  4. Big Miracle, 7.8 mil, 7.8 mil
  5. Underworld: Awakening, 5.5 mil, 54.2 mil
  6. One for the Money, 5.2 mil, 19.6 mil
  7. Red Tails, 4.7 mil, 41.1 mil
  8. The Descendants, 4.6 mil, 65.5 mil
  9. Man on a Ledge, 4.4 mil, 14.6 mil
  10. Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close, 3.8 mil, 26.7 mil
Movie Title, Weekly Earnings, Total Earnings

Trailers

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy