-
k mzrks 04/11/2009 7:36:00 AM
I love Neil, but you are sooooo right on. I was really sad to hear these new songs. But you've made it all ok and ridiculously funny. Thanks.
-
jacob kauffman 02/26/2009 1:30:00 AM
After hearing the single released on Neil's website I've been bursting with anticipation about the new album. I can't believe people are criticizing him for writing relevant material that is dealing directly with governmental and societal problems. Oh, how dare he speak like a common man. Neil's driving home his points with straight forward yet clever lyrics and boiler plate rock pumping behind him. He's moving like a locamotive just pounding away.
check out jack lewis and the cutoffs song The Day Neil Young Died. He took on Skynyrd!
-
Terry 01/14/2009 11:28:00 PM
Hey everybody! I just tossed my guitar against the wall and recorded the results for my next album. You think Neil will sue me for copyright infringement?
-
Samus 01/14/2009 5:04:00 AM
Neil is an aging unkempt epileptic who has recently had brain surgery. He's also one of the most influential guitarists of the 20th century. I would hate to see this guy reviewing Roky Erickson.
-
Alex 01/12/2009 10:14:00 PM
Most hilarious juxtaposition of any comment here: "Neil Young" and "God-given talent." BWHAHA!!!!! Someone find Neil a clean cot at the nearest homeless shelter and we'll have one less crazed noisemaker in the world.
-
herb hesse 01/12/2009 3:12:00 AM
question:
Neil is to Young as "writer" rob is to What?
ans: an opinion with an .
Obviously the village idiot also has a voice. Too bad his heads up his ass!
Then again;
That may explain why he heard what he said he heard when I obviously heard something different at the same show.
A living legend, an artist, a WRITER processing the news of the day through his god-given gift of communication and certainly a very fresh process it is.
True, not all are classics or destined to be so, but the wife and I are always ENTERTAINED by ANY 63 yr. old PERFORMER who Rocks hard, folks easy and then Rocks harder for over 2 1/2 hrs with little more than a 5 min. encore break in between. Take notes, all poser bands with extended breaks.
Oh yeah, one more thing:
I would rather listen to Neil put his own indelible stamp on an over-played classic then listen to a douche with a press pass any day (or early A.M. - WAH!) of the week.
Earn it.
You, "writer" rob.
-
Eric 01/10/2009 9:49:00 PM
Remember the days when a critic could write a witty review, and readers were swift enough to appreciate it? "Me love Neil, you confuse me with strange words and things, raaah!!"
-
andrea bianco 01/08/2009 12:37:00 AM
It's the stupidity and the banality of this article that terrorizes me. Long May You Run, Neil.
Andrea.
-
ralph 01/02/2009 4:01:00 AM
Word is,accross the country is that moat all old time high holly rockers must be seen no less than five shows to catch one worthwhile special,regardless of the new material.Witness the grateful dead phenomenon.....this started because by 1984 we had to catch 5 showz minimum.Same goes for Dylan these dayse.When these guys are in perfect tune/time/feel besides rockin me out they realy make me mad knowing they could have played that way during the suckeee showz.Available bootleggs legally distributed on the net will prove this point.Dylan can sing clearly and in tune whenever he feels inspired.Think of that next time you hear him do his farm animal routine on stage.Its not the material but the level of inspiration which makes albums and concerts worth it.
-
auspiciousbunny 01/01/2009 1:42:00 AM
This review is barely coherent! But the voice is now pretty lame anyway.
-
lana 01/01/2009 1:28:00 AM
Honestly, my friend was so angered by this review I finally came here to read it, or, uh, try to read it, myself. But it barely makes any sense.
The only comment I can think to make is at least Neil can string some words together reflecting a coherent point of view. Which is more than this writer has done, except for communicating that he likes Neil's old stuff. Hardly an interesting point of view, considering people were having that conversation in 1985.
But Neil Young, for instance, has written "Let's impeach the president" an idea which seems clear as day to me. I even agree with it. I have never owned a Neil Young recording in my life. Maybe I'll get that one.
The Voice, as everyone by now knows, lost all of its decent writing talent after being bought by the New Times media french fry chain, and became a gathering point for the type of phony rebel New York is presently crawling with. You know, who have energy to expend worrying about the style of the legs of their trousers.
-
mike 12/31/2008 6:50:00 AM
Hey, at least he is a legend and he is not playing the same old Paul McCartney crap.
It doesn't matter all my friends there young and old love Neil.
Look at the Buffalo Springfield stuff way ahead of there time they blew everybody off stage in their day and never made it big, Yet they all made it big, you got a nice gig to bad you missed it all, you were to young.
Hope all you people will be listening to your music in 30 years> Hey I still listen to my parents stuff from the thirties and forties, why because it is good and it influenced everybody even when we did not know it.
-
Kurt 12/31/2008 1:21:00 AM
I can hardly believe that Rolling Stone pays MORONS to go cover a Neil Young show.
You don't like Cortez the Killer in long form? Stay home & let someone who does like Neil write the review.
You suck.
-
Dan 12/31/2008 1:12:00 AM
Joe, if you didn't get the 'cough up the bugs' joke, you are obviously too sarcasm-impaired to be commenting on Mr. Harvilla's writing. And Neil's 'world-renowned?' When did this happen? I must have missed news of his sold-out shows in Paris and Barcelona (they have enough problems with homeless guys pissing themselves in public to let a vagrant like Neil in).
-
joe 12/28/2008 9:51:00 AM
.."cough up the Bugs"??? lol..its bucks.
Definately NOT a well written review, didn't make much sense...
low-budget writing for a low-budget paper.
-
Joe 12/28/2008 12:09:00 AM
Does anyone else see the irony of a work-a-day rock critic no one has ever heard of trying to poke fun at an undeniable, world-renowned talent like Neil Young?
-
Paul 12/27/2008 9:35:00 PM
So the choice Young fans offer is to only read reviews that praise his incisive lyrics, deft guitar-playing, and satisfying showmanship? In what parallel universe do these reviews exist? Could someone post a URL link to this special, sub-atomic place?
-
Rick 12/27/2008 9:19:00 PM
Harvilla is entitled to his opinion but it should be pointed out that a big-city rock critic had to go to a music conference in Texas to find out who Sharon Jones and the Dap-Kings were - a New York band thriving right under his nose. And he's so clueless as to never go see them until they got big and play in Texas. You can use big words bu you are no different thanm the drunk old ladies next to you wanting to hear the old stuff.
-
Matt 12/27/2008 5:34:00 PM
Steve:
Any educated writer would know that this is a poorly written article. And anybody can tell by the animosity toward Neil in your comments that you are just a hater yourself. Your support of the article as good writing or 'spot-on criticism' is just a b.s. justification for your arrogance and hate, which is obvious to any objective person.
I think 'Let's Avoid Rob Harvilla's Next Article' is a much better title for this hideous trash the voice is trying to pass off as critical analysis.
And FYI - there are many Neil Young albums I don't like - so, it's not that I'm a blind fanboy: it's that you're as much of an arrogant dick as Mr. Harvilla.
-
Neil Sidebotham 12/27/2008 6:35:00 AM
This review supports my contention that the standard of rock criticism in the Voice has not recovered from the loss of the Dean - Robert Christgau. I suggest we don't read Rob Harvilla's next article because it is not as good as the latest by Robert Christgau.
-
SteveC 12/27/2008 6:21:00 AM
If ONLY they had torn down Shea Stadium while the Beatles played inside. Neil looks and plays like a homeless guy someone handed a guitar. You can hear better music from the guy who wears trash bags and plays "Redemption Song" at the Subway stop on 4th and Broadway. The Neil and the Damage done.
-
Nick Danger 12/26/2008 10:57:00 PM
Dude:
the nice part about Neil young is that he is so many things to so many people and unless you've been off the planet for some period of time, his entire career has been built on doing WTFHW and making a damn good living at it, and makes no secret of it....perhaps that is his overall attraction...lack of perfection......
I must say that you are only critic I have read on this tour to date to blanch somewhat at a Day in the Life...curious is your comment as I would gladly sit in Shea as they tore it down if the Beatles were playing inside......
-
verne olmstead 12/26/2008 9:46:00 PM
I don't mind honest criticism of my favorite rock and roller in the universe. I myself am critical of him. However, this was not honest criticism and any journalistic integrity was vaporized from the outset when it was obvious the "writer" had preconceived ill will towards Mr. Young. Quite obvious.
The concerts have been getting rave reviews across the country. Here in Michigan, I read great reviews, nothing negative, and the encore brought the house down. I was linked this article by a friend of a friend. It isn't like the "Village Voice" is relevant anymore. It's pretty much a rag for freaks anyway.
It isn't all that unusual to see people leave early either. I've seen it at Springsteen concerts. Besides, who cares about those folks anyway? The writer hates Neil, which is fine. Just admit it instead of trying to disguise it (poorly I might add).
I have never herd of the writer, so I am taking a guess here. I bet he writes a lot of negative stuff. He would probably complain about a good f*ck.
-
Steve 12/26/2008 9:20:00 PM
Sorry, Matt, none of us are friends of Rob, just people who know good writing and on-target criticism when they see it.
Maybe someday you'll stop being blinded by fanatical loyalty to the pathetic joke that is Young and see what we mean.
-
Matt 12/26/2008 7:37:00 PM
You gotta love the crowd of cheerleaders for this writer. This is not a good article by any stretch of the imagination. It's badly written, it's arrogant, self-serving. This guy is just trashing Neil Young for these really shallow reasons. He's a hack. Give it up, guy.
And give it up to the smarmy fan-club posting "positive" comments about the article. Probably just some of the guy's friends, who obviously lack any real sense of critical fairness, or respect for one of the greatest musical artists of all time.
Neil Young deserves respect, not some supercillious, repugnant, nose-in-the-air, holier-than-thou tripe from an untalented moron.
-
Graeme Tuckett 12/26/2008 5:17:00 AM
Ignore the illiterate criticism buddy. Thats a stunning review, well written, well thought through, and funny as hell. Whether I agree with you or not is beside the point, the article is great!
-
desolationrow 12/26/2008 2:42:00 AM
Hey I wrote off "Are You Passionate" but if anyone deserves extra credit for following his muse with integrity - it's Uncle Neil. By the way I was at the MSG concert and the encore song was a Tom Waits song called Get Behind the Mule (in the morning and drive)
-
Bob 12/26/2008 1:46:00 AM
Neil Young sucks. He should retire and stop making a fool of himself. He only wrote about 4 good songs anyway. He looks like he belongs in a wheelchair. He should stick to making liberal moronic statements and gay electric cars.
-
fernando 12/26/2008 1:44:00 AM
I like the music of Neil Young all my life in special the first albums,I was thinking that this guy for his lirics in his music is a nice guy but I got the oportunity to asked for a autograph and he didnt tell me nothing and he didnt want to give me a minute for talk with him and nothing. He is not a good guy. Is a big stupid.
-
trev gibb 12/25/2008 10:23:00 PM
very poorly written article. You need to open your mind a little mate.
-
Stephen Conn 12/25/2008 10:15:00 PM
Ignore the above dimwits, Rob. Your review was fabulous! The "enraged fisherman hooking himself" line was up there with the best of the Voice, John Lahr, and the New Yorker's criticism in its less precious mode. I'll never forget having to sit with a desperate grin as a friend played Neil's hamfisted anti-Bush album a few years back - what a talentless, buffoonish wreck Young's become! If someone wants a few decent tracks from the old days, get the "Decade" album; otherwise, everyone knows this is nowhere.
-
Stephen Conn 12/25/2008 10:02:00 PM
Ignore the above dimwits, Rob. This review was fabulous! The "enraged fisherman hooking himself" line was up there with the best of the Voice, John Lahr, and the New Yorker's criticism in its less precious mode. I'll never forget having to sit with a desperate grin as a friend played me Neil's hamfisted anti-Bush album - what a talentless, buffoonish wreck Young's become! If someone wants a few decent old cuts, scan the "Decade" album; otherwise everyone knows this is nowhere.
-
Matthew 12/25/2008 7:17:00 PM
I'm not a Neal Young fan; I respect him, but he just doesn't do it for me. That said, I think it's indescribably shallow for a music critic, of all people, to suggest it is a negative that an artist as influential as Neil Young should spend his well-earned sunset years regurgitating the same songs in the same way just to ease the mind of passing fans and, well, journalists.
I'd hate to see your review of Dylan's show.
Anyone who goes to a Neil Young show should know by now he is constantly follow his muse, and the range is far & wide. Again, I'm not a particular fan (I think I owned "After The Gold Rush" and the 3-disc greatest hits in my life.) but even I know not to expect a Greatest Hits show.
This isn't Duran, Duran at the county fair.
-
DrJimmy 12/25/2008 6:27:00 PM
Right on...Neil is a has-been and getting senile. If I were him I'd be worried about some of his fans...er, I mean his stalkers. Neil was good in the 70's then lost it all (and never got it back) when he did TRANS. He should go back to that computer voice. It was awesome.
-
gary 12/25/2008 3:29:00 PM
can't believe this asshole has a job
-
Doug Jenson 12/25/2008 2:59:00 AM
Your article pretty much sums up all the reasons that Neil's fans love him. Most everything that you mention as a negative, Neil's fans find positive and love him for. Neil will never appeal to middle of the road "I like pretty music" lovers; that's why you don't hear his music played on the radio much. But then again, you won't hear those groups who are playing pretty music mentioned in the same breath as Neil Young when it comes to the music industries' iconic legends. It�s too bad you didn�t enjoy the concert; it appears from all the other reviews I read that it was amazing. But that�s okay; I have a hard time explaining why I like Neil so much to my friends too. I think that is because Neil�s music is not something that is easily tangible, his music is much more of a feeling; that is why if you don�t understand or �get the feeling� you can�t really write about it and make sense of it. Your review certainly did not get me upset, I�m very used to reading reviews like yours when it comes to Neil. It is the same type of reviews that were prevalent 30 years ago when people did not understand who Neil was (is).
-
TruckFlap 12/24/2008 7:06:00 PM
Maybe you shouldn't see anymore Neil shows, obviously you're burnt on him. As far as his recordings, yes he does seesaw, but when he's on he's ON!, and those ON's are braver, more thrilling and intelligent than most other acts, especially the other 60's/70's lions.
-
taint 12/24/2008 6:34:00 PM
too bad you weren't there in 1971...you'd be telling neil to stop playing all these new songs like heart of gold, old man, etc. or in 1973, when you'd be telling him to stop playing all these news songs (the entire tonight's the night album). or in 1989, rockin' in the free world. etc etc.
i'm not comparing his current crop with those classics, just sayin'.
-
Zelda 12/24/2008 6:08:00 PM
Let's avoid Rob Harvilla's lousy, unintelligent, writing of the world's greatest musician - Neil Young
-
Ed 12/24/2008 5:28:00 PM
The title of this article is insulting, and the text is pure condescension. The writer obviously thinks very highly of himself. I can't believe the Voice would even publish this condescending trash.
-
Marie 12/24/2008 3:12:00 PM
Fuck you
-
Matt 12/24/2008 9:35:00 AM
Wow, what an arrogant, utterly stuck up article.
-
Barry Hohstadt 12/24/2008 6:49:00 AM
So you like don't like Neil. Fine. Your review sucks assbite.
-
Barry Hohstadt 12/24/2008 6:48:00 AM
So you like don't like Neil. Fine. Your review sucks assbite.