Addressing the crowd gathered for the world premiere of Delhi-6 at MOMA, Indian actor Abhishek Bachchan announced that the film we were about to see truly represents the India of today and the youth of today. The India of today (and spurious representations thereof) is a concept currently under review; by the time a grudging consensus is reached, the India of next week will have crowded in. But in his claim, Bachchan (nicknamed Little Bhe is the son of Big B, Bollywood superstar Amitabh Bachchan, whom my seatmates, aisle-mates, and adjacent row-mates concurrently agreed is the greatest actor in history, an assertion supported by a certain sewage-covered, autograph-seeking boy early in Slumdog Millionaire) had posed an intriguing question: Could a true-blue Bollywood film ever represent something other than the highly referent, tightly clockworked chaos of Bollywood cinema? While Rakeysh Omprakash Mehras Delhi-6the story of an American-born Indian who accompanies his ailing grandmother (Waheeda Rehman) to Delhi and, duly appalled and enchanted by what he sees, undergoes a cultural conversion and rather brutal baptismattempts to address the generational, economic, and religious problems dividing modern India, it does so in an unapologetically broad, whacked-out way, with each of Bollywoods four food groups (corn, cheese, treacle, and nuts) present and accounted for. Which is to say, of course, that its pretty much irresistible and, in that sense, represents the enigmatic India of today as well as anything ever could.
*indicates required fields. Please enable browser cookies before filling out this form. All reader comments are subject to our Terms of Use. By clicking Add Comment, you acknowledge that you have reviewed and agree to these Terms.
Comments may take a few minutes to process and appear on the site. Please do not click the "Add Comment" button again while your comment is being added.
Andy 03/02/2009 10:25:12 PM
"Which is to say, of course, that it’s pretty much irresistible and, in that sense, represents the enigmatic India of today as well as anything ever could." Woah, hold on there. It represents the India of today as well as anything that ever could? How exactly did you conclude that? Or do you mean to say that it's relatively better than all the other crap that comes out of bollywood, so this is as good as it gets for audiences? even if that were the case, it's still a crappy movie. what part of this film -- the cinematography, the editing or the screenplay -- did you find so enigmatic? What on earth are you talking about?