Top

news

Stories

 

Quentin Tarantino: The Inglourious Basterds Interview

Two decades after the severed ear of Reservoir Dogs, Quentin Tarantino serves up Hitler's head on a plate

Your movies are pretty chaste, too.

Yeah.

Moving right along, I know that, unlike many directors, you read a lot of film criticism.

Film criticism is in a strange place. Talk about 17 years later! I could never have imagined that print film reviewing would be dying. It's unfathomable to me. I don't like reading film criticism on a laptop. I like holding it in my hand.

You're a geezer, Quentin.

Exactly. It seems to me from reading a lot of the film criticism that came out of Cannes this year that the few print critics that are left writing are so busy combating these Internet bozos that there's a new formalism, a new self-seriousness among remaining critics, to prove they're professionals. Even some of the younger critics who are still writing in print—well, they're not that young—are coming across like young fogies. There are some good online critics, but then there's these fanboy types: "Ooh, this sucks balls." It's a little bit like '78, '79, '80, where exuberance in filmmaking is not getting its due anymore. For example, The Blues Brothers never got any respect. Now, it truly is beloved, as it goddamn well should be. I mean, it's sad to think of what happened to John Landis after An American Werewolf in London, but in those two movies, he was the first fanboy director making movies out of his head.

I feel very lucky to live the life of an artist in this town, in this industry. I have no intention of ever being a director for hire. I just started guiding myself as things have gone on. One of the huge lessons I learned is that these writer-directors come out, and their films are idiosyncratic—they have a special voice and those first two movies are like that. But it's hard work to go back to a blank page, to start from scratch every single, solitary time and make a great movie every time. There are exceptions. Woody Allen is one of them.

Not necessarily for the better.

I think he's in a renaissance, except for Melinda and Melinda. I loved Anything Else. But it's much easier [for a director] to say, "What scripts are out there?" Either they buy it and rewrite it, or they work with a writer. And they get more movies made. That's all well and good, but cut to 10 years down the pike, and all of a sudden, they don't have that voice anymore. They're sucking dick for the Man. I'm not interested in just doing a job or working with this actor just to work with them. I learned something after I did Jackie Brown—and don't get me wrong, I love Jackie Brown. But when it was all over—even when I was making it—the fact that it was just a little bit once removed made me a little bit disconnected from it. That's why I haven't done another adaptation since then. I want to naturally fall into the next thing that's going to turn me on.

Is there pressure on you to work more often?

No. I mean I don't want another six-year gap like what happened between Jackie Brown and Kill Bill. I make a movie every year and a half, two years. When I finish, I take six months of doing nothing, and that's great. But you can live life while you're writing. It's a fun life, actually, 'cause I'm working and committed and passionate, but I go out and see friends. When I'm making a movie, the world goes away and I'm on Mt. Everest. Obama is President? Who cares? I'm making my movie.

Is it hard to maintain friendships when you work this way?

They understand. But I'm still a younger guy. I haven't settled down, and these will not necessarily be the friends I have for the next 20 years. I don't have a family. I'm still allowed to run away with the circus. The way I live my life, I like the yin and yang. Even though I quit school when I was in junior high, I'm an academic at heart, and my study is cinema. I've been writing a movie review book over the years, and I'm not in any hurry to finish it. I started writing the book because it wasn't enough that I was just seeing movies—they were being lost to the atmosphere. It's like my whole life I'm studying for a professorship in cinema, and the day I die is the day I graduate.

If we meet again in 17 years' time, will you have settled down?

We'll see. There was a time in the early part of this decade that I kind of had baby fever. And it just didn't work out with a couple of women. And now I don't have baby fever. Not that I don't want a baby, but, like a writer, I want it to be . . . let's set this up a little bit more.

How do you look back on that 1992 Sundance Film Festival where Reservoir Dogs was first screened, and you were part of that group of young Turks?

<< Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next Page >>
 
  • 06/10/2011 4:29:00 AM

    The statement that there was little Jewish resistance to the Holocaust is historically inaccurate, the obvious examples being the Warsaw Ghetto uprisings (there were two). In Eastern Europe there were dozens of partisan groups composed of Jews who fought against the Nazi occupation. There were several uprisings within concentration camps. There were also numerous individual acts of resistance. In addition, there were thousands of German and Austrian Jews who had immigrated to the U.S. before the war and returned as members of the U.S. armed forces to liberate their homeland. This topic is too large to do it justice in a comment but it isn't difficult to find a lot of information on this subject.

  • George 09/01/2009 7:57:00 PM

    I think it was fitting that MoMA screened "Shoah" and Anthology had "Come and See" in the same week that Tarantino's new film was released. Also to QT: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mordechaj_Anielewicz

  • blofeld 08/30/2009 2:40:00 PM

    my penis was severed at a tarantino screening by an over zealous film fan. if you see it please return to po box 666 66666 devil town usa

  • Alejandro Arbona 08/27/2009 3:53:00 AM

    A very interesting interview -- Tarantino's thoughts on the expressive power of plot-driven genre stories versus the more confessional autobiographic style were very insightful. But for pete's sake -- for Ms. Taylor to lead off with a major, major revelation about the climax of the movie in her very first opening remark?! It's inconsiderate, thoughtless, and maybe even downright mean. And not just on her part, but on the part of her editor as well.

  • Mike Disbelief 08/22/2009 8:11:00 PM

    Amazing spoiler in the first question. Just amazing. What the hell were you thinking? And who would print that?

  • sal 08/21/2009 11:44:00 AM

    43 How good to hear from the man! Inglorious Basterds is a total romp and just adds to his mystique. Let's hope he stays in 'film school' for a long long time to come. QT's Pulp Fiction fits right in there with his five favs but I think he's missing some 40's flicks that should also make the cut ... and, of course, Hitchcock. Great Interview, thanks! I'll be looking for that next interiew in 2026!

 

Most Popular Stories


Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy