Top

film

Stories

 

Michael Moore Is Now a Marxist for Capitalism: A Love Story

But he's still selling the same old shtick

The ushers at a packed screening of Michael Moore's latest movie, Capitalism: A Love Story, came proudly decked out in T-shirts bearing slogans like "Make Love, Not Capitalism" and "Capitalism, We Have a Problem." The shirts and the movie are brought to you by those filthy Reds: Overture Films—which is owned by John Malone, the Limbaugh-loving media magnate who was fined a hefty $1.4 million this summer by the Justice Department for illegal stock purchases.

Such are the contradictions of late capitalism, and I wish that more of them had made it into this scattershot, lazy slice of agitprop, which recycles Moore's usual slice-and-dice job on corporations, while bobbing a curtsey to the current crisis.

Michael Moore waits patiently for someone to ambush.
Overture Films
Michael Moore waits patiently for someone to ambush.

Details

Capitalism: A Love Story
Directed by Michael Moore
Overture Films
Opens September 23

Less a movie than a traveling circus, Capitalism is cobbled together from the director's usual toolbox of film clips, pseudo-triumphalist choral scores, potted labor history, and staged stunts with the director's left-leaning pals—in this case, a downright baffling shopping trip with a bemused Wallace Shawn to illustrate the oxymoronic doublespeak of free market.

Moore is a skilled court jester, and there's some bitter fun in the sight of a Harvard economist tying himself in knots trying to define a derivative, or Moore wrapping the perimeter of AIG headquarters in crime-scene yellow tape like some unhinged Christo. But if you've seen his other films—the footage of former Treasury Secretary Donald Regan whispering to a speechifying President Reagan to "speed it up," or Reagan the actor slapping a woman on screen intercut with footage of marching feminists—a dubbed-over Jesus spewing corporate doublespeak feels like old hat. Mostly, Capitalism is a point-by-point retread of Moore's 1989 film Roger & Me, with Moore trying and failing once more to gain entry to the offices of General Motors. He notes, but doesn't much pursue, the fact that the company is now bankrupt. Instead, he goes on pummeling the corporations, and the legislators who sit in their laps, in the usual way. If Capitalism feels stale, it's partly because Moore isn't trying very hard, but more crucially because, one way or another, now everyone knows about or has felt the sting of the current crisis firsthand.

If economic collapse has done anything to change Moore's position, it has been to push him further—or, at least, more explicitly—to the left. Contrary to its strategically ambiguous title, whose irony is designed to make hip liberals nod their knowing heads without scaring off the hard right (as if they'd show up for anything with Michael Moore in the credits), Capitalism is the most purely Marxist film Moore has ever made. Its purpose is not just to go after corporations and their sidekicks in Congress, but also to fully come out of the closet and acknowledge free enterprise as evil. Quite an admission from a man who, on this side of the Atlantic, never identifies himself as a socialist—unless he's talking to Canadians.

Predictably, Capitalism played well with Moore's most loyal constituency, the college-educated young blades at my screening, who clapped when Dennis Kucinich's face filled the screen and gave the movie a standing ovation. Will the lifelong Republicans and conservative Democrats whose lives have been shredded by the worst slump since the Great Depression show up, assuming they can still afford a trip to the multiplex? Unlikely, but if they did, they'd see their daily plight writ large in the movie's genuinely touching moments, unadorned by Moore's cloying habit of milking pathos for every last drop.

We see Moore walking his elderly but still sharp father around the razed lot that was once the spark-plug factory where he had worked all his life, visiting companies that are making a go out of profit-sharing, and chatting with the sheriff who put an end to foreclosures in his town. Though there's little here that we don't see already on TV news, you'd have to have a heart of stone not to be moved by the victims of foreclosure and shady bank deals who allow the director into their shattered lives. The last word goes to a gun owner whom we watch packing up his home and then, heartbreakingly, being paid a measly $1,000 to clean up the site by the very bank that foreclosed on him. "There's the people that's got it all, and the people who don't have nothing," he says bitterly. Charlie Marx must be shouting "Toldja!" from his grave.

 
  • 08/09/2011 10:25:00 PM

    Michael Moore does not understand the difference between Capitalism, which is a perfectly functional and fair system of commerce, and Corporatism, (sometimes hailed by the misnomer of crony Capitalism) which is a corrupt system which results as a merger of collectivism and capitalism. This is truly farcical, as Moore is obviously a staunch Capitalist. Perhaps he does not yet understand the Marxism only exists for the poor, or perhaps he knows and doesn't care because he's too rich and well-connected to be damaged by it. Inner party members always get a pass under Marxism. In Obama's America we have real Mussolini-style economic Fascism, or Corporatism. Under Corporatism society and economy are organized into corporations whose activities, outputs and profits are centrally planned by a dictator. In stark contrast to a market economy which operates on the basis of competition, a corporatist economy works through collective bargaining. Thus the sudden prominence of unions on the political scene. Unfortunately, with Marxism there is always an enemies list. Guess Mr. Moore had better keep up the good propagandist work - don't want to get your name on that list!

  • 03/10/2011 11:53:00 PM

    Moore is a bufoon and a fraud. Typical limosene liberal. A gazillionaire who lives like a prince and pretends he is a man of the people.

  • smdahl 02/25/2010 10:49:00 AM

    Ella tows the corporate line so well!

  • Franziska Oliver 10/18/2009 2:36:00 AM

    With the US being in the state it is in at the present time, with the casino capitalism having turned against the majority of the US citizens, with the media and consumism having brainwashed and made a large part of the population downright stupid, with round about 1% owning just as much if not more than the other 99% of the popuation,and so on... I frankly think that this film review is cynical. mind you, I am not a friend of documentaries of MM's style, but the large majority of US citizens do no longer understand a more complex and subtle film language. I wonder why. But of you, Ella Taylor, a very capable film reviewer, I do expect more sensitivity regarding the sleaze in the political system, i.e. tha fact, that one could certainly say, that filthy rich CEOs are running your country. Regards, F. Oliver

  • 10/04/2009 7:32:00 AM

    The real problem with capitalism is not the disparity between the winners and the losers. It runs deeper. Capitalism transforms life into a tragi-comic play in which each of us is cast in the dual roles of winner and loser. It is in the individual's inability to find meaning outside the narrow proscenium arch of this hackneyed grand guignol that rends so many lives from the potential grace of true community. It would be reasonable to assume, as Moore does, that those who eventually come to understand that they are never going to be the protagonist in the drama would reject the entire proceedings. But alas, the reverse is more often true -- supporting players revere the hero's grotesque posturings, celebrate the "accomplishment" of their own speaking roles, and pile scorn upon the walk-ons. All those extras cluttering the stage are clearly inferior, otherwise they'd have a line or two themselves, right? And besides, any thespian with ambitions must pay his dues by accepting whatever billing the producers see fit to extend. To call attention to the play's clumsy exposition and shameless artifice is to risk being written out by some vindictive ham upstage claiming connections to the writer, a fate usually reserved for those with a faiblesse for ad-libbing. (I'm keenly aware that a more prudent writer would have abandoned this metaphor sentences ago, but since greed is our theme, I'm going with creative excess). It is the goal of each and every player to die during the performance -- with sword in hand, as it were -- in dedicated service, NOT to the imaginary audience, nor even to the other actors on the troupe, but to the play itself - to capitalism itself. Perhaps the underlying fatalism I felt watching "Capitalism: A Love Story" stems from Moore's coming dangerously close to an inescapable conclusion that most of us would prefer to put on the dog's costume and take whatever meager prop bone is thrown our way, than to purposely break the spell of the illusion holding us in thrall. For most, such an act would render the struggles of one's entire life, up to that point anyway, completely meaningless. We're all too heavily invested in the drama for that to happen in significant numbers, which is why Moore's mournful howl-to-action will go mostly unanswered.

  • Steve 09/29/2009 6:59:00 PM

    This is one of the more condescending and nonsensical movies reviews I've read in quite some time. Moore's work is always excellent, he happens to be filmmaker of a progresive bent who's broken through into the mainstream. It's too bad this critic can't realize or understand the value Moore brings to the table.

  • ruby 09/29/2009 4:32:00 AM

    Michael Moore is right about capitalism, but he needs to go deeper Check out this short video from the Maoist political economist Raymond Lotta called The Rape of the Congo and Your Cell Phone http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NBhiEKZezhY If this movie moved you to want to know more and to get into a critical debate about the future of humanity and the fact that there is a viable and desirable alternative that is socialism and communism then you need to tune into an amazing evening with Lotta called Behind the World Economic Crisis: System Failure and the Need for Revolution. It will be a live Web cast on Sept. 29 at 7:30 p.m. EDT For details go to http://revolutionbooksnyc.org

  • Richard Van Ingram 09/28/2009 2:08:00 AM

    Day ~ I am sure you do disagree, but I don't think your position reflects Michael Moore's. He made this movie,NOT leftist revolutionaries and Marxist theorists. One of the main problems with "the system" - or "systems" - is that the people who run these means of social control, left, right and otherwise, are still operating under the influence of "isms" and ideologies born of limited 19th and 20th century mis-interpretations of what a human being is and what a good society might be and how best to achieve a solution to human problems. A great number of these - including communism, laissez faire capitalist egoism, and racist fascism - owe their modern origins to a misapplication of Darwinian theory outside the narrow confines of biology (where it is proper) to the human social sphere (where it is illigitimate). The communist applies "survival of the fittest" to one class - the working class -- and predicts an inevitable destruction of all other classes. The capitalist applies "survival of the fittest" to the lone individual and comes down with the idea some are born to fall by the wayside and be used by the marketplace so the strong can progress. The racist fascists say that "survival of the fittest" applies to one racial type or bloodline, a "people," and all others are subordinate to this superior race or group. All are fallacious. The measure of human worth is not mere "survival," but "who deserves to live," who upholds values and standards that are good in themselves, who recognizes the inherent worth of human life. Philosophy in the West lost this vision many, many decades ago & only had a tenuous grasp on it to begin with - the great 19th and 20th c.ideologies such as capitalism and communism that shifted the idea of value from "moral" or "ethical value" to "material worth" or "use value" (to borrow a tern from Karl Marx himself) only clouded the air and turned all human questions into political ones. I think Moore, somewhere in his narratives, is far more interested in morality than in mere utility - material usefulness, for him, seems to grow from ethical concerns, not the other way around (i.e. the Marxist vision). So, repsectfully, I still insist Moore's documentary isn't Marxist - he's more interested in justice than materialism. [If you wish to research an alternative philosophical position from your own, I'd send you to Jose Ortega y Gasset.]

  • Richard Van Ingram 09/26/2009 8:59:00 PM

    It's difficult to comment about a documentary one has yet to see, yet less difficult to respond to this review. For all Michael Moore's "failings" as a movie maker, let's be honest: He is the only major voice in the past two decades to step up to the plate when it was unpopular to do so and aim that cinematic shotgun at the pillars of the community who, unfailingly, were destroying the foundations of the same community in the name of quick profits. Not only has he been unafraid of being unpopular, but he has done so using the loudest bullhorn available -- mass media -- all in the name of waking the marks up to the presence of the con men running the country. If he has been loud, if he has painted with broad strokes, if Moore has sliced-and-diced his way through corporate hallways in a sometimes sloppy fashion, it has been because his adversaries have been engaged in a war of all-against-all, leaving no means of victory off their own tables, effectively selling themselves to the middle and lower classes as their champions at the same time the last thing on their minds was the good of the country or common people. Let's face it: Moore at least stands for something worth standing for. He does it in the only way he knows how while theoreticians and academics, right, left, and libertarian, fail to communicate the problems and possible solutions to average people. Michael Moore is just a guy with a camera and a conscience -- and that's refreshing and decent in an age when most people in front of cameras are there to persuade us to give them more power and money in the name of a mythical day when such will be shared with the rest of us, a day that will never come. Soviet-style communism promised the same sort of paradise to its workers and citizens if only they would allow the leaders advantages in the name of the future that never arrived. Michael Moore's "crime" is he can't see much difference between one ruling class and the next, capitalist or communist . . . because there isn't much difference to be seen, evidently. Moore isn't a Marxist -- he's just an old fashioned New Dealer who wants to see everyone benefit from working, someone much more likely to get along with George Orwell than Lenin.

  • Mike W. 09/25/2009 11:44:00 PM

    I'll reserve judgment about the quality of the film. Haven't seen it yet. However, I'm plenty willing to bet that the movie, if anything like his previous films, will be better than most of the dreck at the cineplex. I'm a left winger, of course, unlike some of the "real Americans" who despise Michael Moore's courageous observations and sometimes biting wit encased in smiling good humor. My inclination is to say to the junk-yard-dog side of Michael Moore, "Get 'em, Sparky!"

  • Robert 09/24/2009 6:15:00 AM

    No, Robert, it's not true that "of course people have to buy tickets to see the film". Mr. Moore made outsized profits in creating and subsequently exhibiting Farenheit:9/11. Clearing, in the evil manner that capitalism allows, potentially over $100 million in world-wide box office, dvd sales & rentals, etc. It's not like he spent $40 million hiring Tom Cruise. The production costs for F'heit: 9/11 came to a paltry $6 million while global box office alone came to $222 million. It's just him, a camera man and some B-roll, so one can be sure his personal take was quite large. With that in mind, the current production, again, was not cost intensive by Hollywood standards. So, if Mr. Moore was truly 'anti-capitalist' instead of just saying that so individuals like you will go give him your money while he eats pommes frites in Cannes, he could certainly rent out Bryant Park like Cablevision does, or Central Park for that matter and subsequent parks around the country and show his movie on the side of a building for free to all who will come and watch it. He has the evil "capital" in his checking account to spend on the "betterment" of the masses if he so chooses. Instead, he charges shlubs like you, just like Coke, Ford and Apple do in hopes of making a profit and financing his next bit of idiotic clap-trap that I am, again, sure you will also find enthralling.

  • sakara 09/24/2009 2:18:00 AM

    michael moore URBAN MYTHS...of how he anonymously gave money to a critic who had health problems; yeah, i bet...michael moore goes to roman catholic italy and is silent, he goes to anti-semetic france and is silent, then he comes to usa WITH HIS BIG MOUTH!!! moore knows better than to talk stupid in france and italy---they'd kick the shit out of him in those backward hell holes.

  • The Frito Pundito 09/24/2009 12:48:00 AM

    Of the trolls here won't deal with the substance of his film. All they know how to do is to attack Michael Moore for being fat, rich and selfish, without knowing anything about how much money he has or how he spends (he has given lots of money to charity, including $12,000, anonymously, to a vicious critic of his who was having financial problems due to a health care issue). This is how capitalists stay in power, but getting people who should know better to do their dirty work for them. It's mind-boggling to me how any criticism of the capitalist system is automatically shouted down as irrelevant and old news, even in the Voice (but then again I guess this paper gave up being progressive a long time ago).

  • GiorgioNYC 09/23/2009 9:38:00 PM

    Uh, Robert, of course people have to buy tickets to see the film. We don't have a socialist system. Maybe instead of making inane and irrelevant ad hominem comments you & others could actually deal with the content of the film, which is quite powerful. And only some of it was shot in Canada.

  • GiorgioNYC 09/23/2009 9:10:00 PM

    Things have gotten pretty bad at the Voice when this film gets a better (albeit mixed),more sympathetic and astute review in the Times. But then Dargis reviewed it for the Times. She must be glad she left the sinking ship that is the Voice.

  • Robert 09/23/2009 9:10:00 PM

    I wonder if everyone who loved this movie had to pay to get in or did Mr. Moore use his personal profits from Farenheit: 9/11 to allow everyone to view the movie for free? "From each according to his ability, to each according to his need" and all that. I also wonder what Mr. Moore thinks of the people that pay their own money to see this stuff as he vacations off the coast of France and not at the Pyongyang "Hilton" all the while using cheaper non-union labor in Canada to make his movies rather than higher priced union labor here in this capitalist hell hole. Hmmmm. I wonder.

  • sakara 09/23/2009 5:37:00 PM

    go to youtube and complain about michael moore not giving any of his millions to charity and teens today will defend him by saying just because michael moore a SOCIALIST that doesn't mean he has to help anyone with his millions....SOCIALISTS DON'T HAVE TO BE CHARITABLE!

 

Find A Film

for free stuff, film info & more!

Find A Coupon

Popular Coupons

Box Office

  1. Chronicle (2012/ I), 22.0 mil, 22.0 mil
  2. The Woman in Black, 20.9 mil, 20.9 mil
  3. The Grey, 9.3 mil, 34.6 mil
  4. Big Miracle, 7.8 mil, 7.8 mil
  5. Underworld: Awakening, 5.5 mil, 54.2 mil
  6. One for the Money, 5.2 mil, 19.6 mil
  7. Red Tails, 4.7 mil, 41.1 mil
  8. The Descendants, 4.6 mil, 65.5 mil
  9. Man on a Ledge, 4.4 mil, 14.6 mil
  10. Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close, 3.8 mil, 26.7 mil
Movie Title, Weekly Earnings, Total Earnings

Trailers

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy