Full Body Laser Hair Removal
New York, NY 10014
The fourth film from directors Allen and Albert Hughes, The Book of Eli centers on the Christianity that was at the margins of their previous films—hypocritically misused by Bokeem Woodbine's bush-crazy marine turned pulpit-pounder turned stick-up man in Dead Presidents, and the sanctimonious grandparents in Menace II Society.
"I don't think God really cares too much about us, or he wouldn't have put us here. . . . Look where we stay at." Thus spoke Menace's O-Dog, referring to Crenshaw Boulevard, not so different from Presidents' Vietnam and '70s Bronx, and From Hell's Whitechapel. In The Book of Eli, the whole world's a blasted ghetto. It's 31 years after the scorched-earth apocalypse. As in The Road, The End has terminally desaturated the world's palette. Only a few tattered product placements have managed to survive. On the road since Year Zero, Denzel Washington's Eli has become an expert at using his wickedly quick machete arm to ward off roving bands of highwaymen from his precious cargo: the last copy of the Bible.
The other copies have been destroyed as taboo, since religious conflict inspired the nuclear holocaust. That's not impossible to believe, though it taxes credulity that a fragmented society that can't dig freshwater wells has managed to destroy every other copy of the most ubiquitous book in the Western world, undoing all of the Gideons' good work. As does the disciple Eli attracting Solara—a badly miscast Mila Kunis, who looks like she's spending a semester abroad in the post-apocalypse from her fashion school's co-op program. As does Eli's zoning out to his iPod during night watches in the hazardous wasteland (a twist-ending revelation makes this particularly ridiculous).
It's water and a battery charge that lure Eli down the Main Street of a repopulated ghost town. The Hugheses play up the spaghetti-western element, as Denzel's Stranger strolls into a saloon owned by Gary Oldman, the town's corroded, lizard-like first citizen. Carnegie is one of the few survivors, like Eli, old enough to remember the lost world. His saloon is the lobby of the abandoned movie theater that he has made his headquarters. Accordingly, he's interested in resurrecting lost forms of mass mind control—Oldman is introduced reading a biography of a great cinephile, Mussolini. It's with cynical messianic intent that he's been scouring the countryside for a Good Book, which sets up a showdown with true believer Eli.
The Hugheses once had a black-comic sense to match their comic-book horror impulses (every line of Menace is a potential inside joke). Here, that sense is evident only in a roadside stop-off with some unhinged survivalists, an elderly American Gothic couple played by Michael Gambon and Frances de la Tour. This opens into a firefight showing off the Hugheses' other strength, their allegiance to uselessly beautiful tracking shots, here scuttling in and out of a besieged frame house as it's shot to pieces. The rest of the rote splatter-violence has Denzel whirlwind lopping off heads through philistine hordes, sequences only good for insight into what PS3 games the Hugheses were playing in pre-production (screenwriter Gary Whitta's previous credits are, aptly, in video games).
It remains to be seen how the clergy, often overeager to accept tribute from popular culture, will receive this gory simony. Nobody reads Pilgrim's Progress anymore, so I guess you take it where you can get it, but The Book of Eli's plastic parable isn't much more advanced than Insane Clown Posse theology. Eli eventually summarizes a lifetime of scriptural study as "Do more for other people than you do for yourself"—an idea hardly unique to Christ—while an ending that combines Fahrenheit 451's Book People and Malcolm McDowell in an insupportable mustache seems to downplay the importance of Eli's cargo.
Eli himself resoundingly fails to follow the Good Samaritan's example when witnessing a roadside hijacking; the most that can be said is that he remains chaste without visible effort. Our hero is mostly an Old Testament smiter of the wicked, finally—unless I forget when Christ said, "You lay that hand on me again and you will not get it back" at the Garden of Gethsemane.
It is hard to believe that some people think Eli is blind throughout this film. Yes, there are such "indications" in the film, such as Eli's facing the rising sun and then turning around to walk westward, and there are the sunglasses, and there is the hit that the nuclear war blinded many people, and the braille, but no one who is blind can fire ten or eleven shots at his dodging adversaries and then bring every one of them down, including riflemen on rooftops! Eli blind? Give me a break!
I found this film illogical in its main premise: the shattered world will be put right if only people can again read the words of the Bible, all copies of which were destroyed by the survivors of the apocalypse. The world was full of bibles before the war and yet the war, motivated by religion, occurred. Why will having one bible on a shelf make a new and better civilization develop the next time? My other objection is with the big AHA moment that implies Eli has been blind throughout his journey. No blind man could ever function so well in such a disorderly world. I prefer to think that Eli was sighted, and happened to be able to read braille, as many sighted people can. The fact that the last bible was in braille was responsible for its survival during the bible-burning mania.
book of eli is a deeply religious movie, as such it is all things to all people. to the christian right it is a movie about a blind man who is guided and protected by a god. to the anti-religious it is about a sighted man that is tormented and punished by an unjust god(do my bidding and go through all this suffering and by the way you can never see the promised land). it is about the strong overcoming the weak, and the weak overcoming the strong. all the opposites are available in the movie and all are open to interpretation depending on your own individual interpretation...
Just had to add a little more; especially liked the caravan of a GMC 'brinks' truck, an old (cheesily armored) Suburban, a Coupe De Ville and a step van, soo funny! And now the icing; if you have faith, a KFC handy wipe and some duct tape are all you need to fix a bullet in the belly!!! But I did enjoy the flik, surprised Denzel did it, but boy did I laugh...
I just saw this thing last night, and laughed my behind off from the start! Pour little pole cat! But it was mostly just dumb. Going into an old house, obviously war torn for decades, and expecting to find water pressure? Come on give me a break! Predictable and stupid, just like blind faith. It seemed these guys (the Hughes') were being tongue-in-cheek about the stupidity and ultimate doom of believers, and even more about to the point of the roles of church, power and money. Is Gary Oldman the next Jim Baker or Jimmy Swaggert wanna-be?! And Malcolm McDowell as a funny looking Keibler cookie guy or something - what a hoot! What a realistic faith slamming hoot.
I think you over simplify the story plot. Rather it is a look a one possible scenario. I think it was fairly well acted.
The ipod isn't a plot hole. The destruction of every Bible in the world and Eli's abilities are no less realistic than any old testament book. Eli's unwillingness to help the woman was probably an intentional effort to give him a weakness, especially considering that not killing the bikers would eventually lead to his downfall.
so... is it thumbs up, or down?
This movie is a wake up call for everyone who can see beyond the real world.The world that we are living now, the past,when all the Bibles were taking way from the schools, and the very present future that we see coming and already are living now.Even a blind person can see it,if this person has the privilege of knowing the BIG BOOK.I really hope that people can see what this movie is about,and just not watch it.May the TRUTH SET YOU FREE,THE WORD OF GOD!
I agree Ben the movie never mentioned Jesus nor did it point to Him. Yet it seems that the author of the review (movie critic) was offended by the message he had received. I am just speak in the context of his review and the quote that was used to sum up His conclusion. The review was not true to the essence of the story. Eli was not on a premeditated murderous rampage but was a survivor on a mission for his time and setting. Eli demonstrated the grace and humility of a man just trying to live in a world that was lost and void of any moral sense and civil law. A world that cast of all restrains (inner moral, social and civil laws) in order to fulfill all it's desires. A world were only the strong survive and were the strong abuse the voiceless and weaker counter part. An interesting parallel? Eli had a sense of inner respect and moral value for people with which was invoked in him through the book. That very book that he carried and also read and in which he became it's protector. The moral essence of man that can only be fulfilled by being a carrier of the book.
I do not think this is a movie for Jesus. I have written my reasons why if you want to check it out here - http://www.benterry.com/?p=979
I see that the critic has miss informed the public with his review. Eli was not a murderer nor was he man on a killing rampage with a desire or premeditated notion to harm anyone. He was a survivor that was chosen to accomplish a mission in such a time as the setting he lived in. Eli was a man that understood the times that he was living in. He understood his mission and what it would take in order to fulfill that call in this post war era where people had no sense of morals or any value of life. So in order to survive he like any other rational man had to protect himself. Eli never entered a situation to kill but gave everyone who threatened his life and calling, an opportunity to move on in peace. When those who had premeditated murderous notions denied his plea he took the actions of self defense. Every single situation that involved him was self defense. Eli's call was much the same as Jesus (as I am speaking in the same context of the author of this review) The only difference was that Jesus knew His call was to lay down His life and die for a world. Eli did not reach that realization until he was confronted with a choice. Not to give the movie away.
Jeff, Just because you think the majority of influential evangelical politicians are idiots doesn't negate the fact that Stan K has a point on the critic's Christian theological training or level of study. If you're going to critique something, it might be good to actually understand what your critiquing. That's all most Christian ask for. I'd hope most of us don't mind the discourse.
The critic seemed to miss the part where, shortly before his summation of the Bible, the character Eli acknowledges that he hasn't been practicing the lessons he learned in the Bible and has been simply protecting it. It was a decent flick. Athiests who can't stand seeing religion in popular culture will get their backs up about it, but the movie shows Religion in both a positive and a negative manner. Personally, I don't mind magical realism, so I enjoyed the movie very much.
Stan K: IT's interesting that non-believers are often blasted for not knowing their 'theology', which therefore makes them unfit to pass judgment on religious proselytizing. However, the majority of pronouncements made by prominent and influential citizens who happen to follow the faith frequently show a conspicuous lack of insight or understanding about historic context (i.e. Palin not knowing why Korea is divided into North and South) or even contemporary reality for that matter (i.e abortions taking place regardless of whether there are state-sponsored clinics). I actually do believe that studying theology is a worthwhile undertaking. But one thing I will never agree with is to follow one course of action to an extreme and deliberate end... One rarely meets well-rounded individuals in our severely polarized world anymore. BTW, the film sounds like garbage.
Well said, Stan K.
Is this a movie review or a theological tract? How much theology have you studied?
Church! Tabernacle! Titty one, Titty two. Prophet Eli. My mental gymnastics will flip you like ancient momma flapjacks.
Maybe the world would be a better place if Christians weren't so excited by violence and keen to kill other people. Killer Saints and prophets? What kind of sick perversion is that?
Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...
Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...
More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience
Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info
Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips
Log in or Sign up
Social Connect:Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.
Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:
Sign Up or Log in
Social Connect:Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.
Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:
