Bloomberg and Walcott Are School Dropouts

Standardized tests 'tried-and-untrue' method of measuring students' learning

"American education, at its best, teaches you how to solve problems, truly understand the material, question authority, think for yourself and be creative. It teaches you to learn what you love and to love learning."

This does not describe this city's public schools.

The kids, their parents, and those of us who give a damn are stuck with Bloomberg and Walcott until the end of the Bloomberg reign—unless there's a lot more pointed, persistent organizing and pressure from these same kids, parents, and those of us who ought to be ashamed to live and vote in a city whose schools keep producing so many lifetime losers.

Among those New Yorkers who are starting their campaigns for mayor, are we going to hear what they specifically are intent on doing to change the public schools into places where students actually feel that learning can—and wow, is!—an exciting part of their lives?

I'm ready to vote for Eva Moskowitz for mayor! Her Success Charter Network schools are for real!

« Previous Page
 |
 
1
 
2
 
All
 
My Voice Nation Help
8 comments
NikoWozz
NikoWozz

I am a 27 years old doctor,mature and beautiful. and now i am seeking a good man who can give me real love, so i got a sername Andromeda2002 on  Agedate.СòM, a nice and free place for younger women and older men,or older women and younger men, to interact with each other.Maybe you wanna check out or tell your friends.

Dr. John Little
Dr. John Little

Mr. Hentoff: Your points here are well taken. They are entertaining and somewhat informative.You need to know, though, that the reporting of student progress is of the utmost importance to the educational process. Further, you need to know that there are three basic modes for such reporting: (1) individual progress, (2) progress compared to peers, and (3) progress in achieving stated goals and objectives. A discussion of student achievement without these modes of evaluation is meaningless. Further, the achievement records of students, according to these modes of reporting, should be made available to students, parents and those who finance public education.

Please note that in group comparisons students with inherently low academically ability tend to grow up and have more children than do students with high academic ability. Go figure.

guest
guest

Was this article auto-translated from another language? It certainly feels like it.

The sentences are stilted and dart this way then that way on their way to a point, sometimes mutiple half-completed points. Semi-colons, ellipsis, and hyphens don't substitute for a series of well-formed sentences to explain or construct an argument.

For example, is the following even a sentence? "So the state education department decrees."

What about this train-wreck: "Finally, for a time, let's go back to Fareed Zakaria in Time (he can also be seen and heard regularly on CNN): "I went through the Asian educational system, which is now so admired."

I'm no writer, but I would expect better editorial control from the Village Voice

Kim88869
Kim88869

My friend recommend me an interesting place__ S'u'c'c'e's's'f'u'l Ming'le.C/0/M __ It's the largest and best club for seeking CEOs, athletes, doctors, lawyers, investors, entrepreneurs, beauty queens, fitness models, and Hollywood celebrities. If you have worked hard for your Millionaire status and want to meet people of the same class, if you want to enjoy a millionaire lifestyle, you may join it. ;-)

Jennifer
Jennifer

My friend recommend me an interesting place__ S'u'c'c'e's's'f'u'l Ming'le.C/0/M __ It's the largest and best club for seeking CEOs, athletes, doctors, lawyers, investors, entrepreneurs, beauty queens, fitness models, and Hollywood celebrities. If you have worked hard for your Millionaire status and want to meet people of the same class, if you want to enjoy a millionaire lifestyle, you may join it. ;-)

Michael Meyers
Michael Meyers

Eva Moskowitz lost her last attempt at elective office in large part because of the strong and unrelenting opposition to her from the NYC teachers' union, which represents the best and the dumbest of the teaching profession. What teachers know--or don't know--is a big factor in raising the levels of academic achievement of our chidlren. Indeed, a recent Harvard study confirms that great, knowledgeable, caring and effective teachers can impact the lives of children in ways that follow them into adulthood, instilling in them critical thinking skills, a passion for knowledge, learning, and inquiry, and increasing their chances of success in college and the work place. Hence, it is very important for teachers to be evaluated on the basis of their students' academic performance.

Minority students, in particular, need effective teachers--who are these chidlren's earliest role models.

The whole system needs to be reformed in ways to get the best teachers in the lowest performaning schools--which requires major changes in the Teachers Contract as well as the imposition of a rigorous system of evaluating teachers that allows for the termination of awful professionals, they who have negative attitudes toward children, who baby-sit, rather than teach, and those who don't have the requisite knowledge and skills to convey high caliber teaching and expand learning opportunities. Mostly, teachers should have high expectations of their students and welcome a system of evaluation that demonstrates their competence at instruction and inspiring learners. Successful charter schools are that way because their teachers are carefully screened and challenged and evaluated based on attaining dramatic results as to academic achievement levels. Those charter schools that fail, like other public (tradiitonal) schools ought to be closed. Teachers who can't or won't teach, ought to be removed from the classroom.

The irony is that while the system is raising academic standards for children--albeit through standardized testing to measure their competence and knowledge levels--teachers resist such accountability when it comes to being evaluated on the baiss of their ssudents' test scores or their students' academic achievement, however that achievement--or lack thereof, is to be measured. Moreover, the system--the Mayor and the State Education Department (meaning the State Education Commissioner, at the behest of Regents Chancellor Merryl Tisch, dumbed down the qualifications for NYC Schools Chancellor. The past three, four Schools Chancellors got waivers of the educational qualifications and school experience that the state law required. That's because Mayor Bloomberg--in whose trust and direction the State Legislature placed the responsibioity for our public schools--chose cronies and dilettantes like Catherine Black, and people without the requisite taste, talent, and qualifications to lead and evaluate teachers. They skipped over--not even conducting EEO searches--probable candidates who know something about curriculum, professional development, and how to properly hold students and professionals to high standards.

What are our pupils to think when the State lowers and waives repeatedly the standards and qualifications for the city's Schools Boss?

The resignation of Cathy Black as Schools Chancellor was necessary because the powers that be--the Mayor, the State Education Commissioner, and the Board of Regents' Chancellor, made it possible for an underqualified non-educator, a veritable dunce (a minion of Bloomberg's), to take charge of the city's public schools. After making that big mistake, the same characters repeated it by granting yet another waiver of the statutory qualifications for a schools superintendent certificate so that Mayor Bloomberg could appoint yet another of his cronies (Dennis Walcott) to the top post of NYC Schools Chancellor.Ugh.Put the dunce cap on all these amateurs!.

Michael Meyers, Executive DirectorNew York Civil Rights CoalitionManhattan, New York

JL
JL

Second paragraph correction: the first line should read academic--not academically.

Guest
Guest

Mr. Meyer, As much as I respect you and believe that your intentions are good, I am somewhat dismayed at your naivete in this very vital area of concern.Granted accountability for all stakeholders in the educational system should always be a vital component. Where your naivete shows is in your fairly blind,unquestioning acceptance of standardized testing as a proper means to achieve the end of student accountability.Anyone with even a basic knowledge of psychometrics and the statistical basis thereof is aware that the population upon which the test is normed has everything to do with the ultimate results. Knowing that, some among us who stand to gain, whether in terms of power or financial remuneration,have also come to this conclusion and have endeavore to "game the system" by using their influence to induce changes in that basis. For example, a mayor in control of a school system which is entering contract negotiations with its teachers may find that low scores on the test are in his best interest. Could not an infusion of green make a difference in the manner in which the norming sample is selected, thereby skewing the results? Or in a different scenario, when there is an election or a vote on continued mayoral control of the same system, could not the influence of lucre again be brought to bear to obtain the desired higher test scores?It is not beyond credibility for our stats fudging illegal third term purchasing current mayor to conceiving the idea of obtaining for himself what has unfortunately come to be known in NYC teaching circles as " the best test scores money can buy." The mayor rode his testing bubble for quite some time, much as Wall St. had ridden the housing bubble, until it burst, at which time, Joel Klein, the beneficiary of this largesse strode into the warm embrace of the reptilian Murdoch, and Cathy Black became a welcome distraction for City Hall from the troubling questions which were sure to follow. It was a perfect circus of plausible deniability,the old flim -flam writ large.Of course, blame went to the usual suspects as per the Post's MO= blame the teachers! So, Mr.Meyer, are we to assume from all which has occurred that it is wise to not only continue the prescription of this medication which so obviously does not work, but to increase the dosage and add many more unproven elements to the treatment, all at tremendous co=pays? I think not! Please reexamine your stance towards acceptance of standardized tests as indicative of anything beyond statistical manipulation and huge outlays of taxpayer dollars.

 
Loading...