Wow, came from the Rotten Tomatoes review portal and after reading insightful, yet short (figures) reviews from Los Angeles Times, NYT, Toronto Star, etc which were more than happy, that the movie skipped the most obviously cliches and so could they, this review went straight to the point. The documentary about videogames failed you for not connecting with people of "your" age? Have you checked the content of the site lately? Was it that you couldn't relate to subject, even though (classic story) about people dedicating their lifes to create something, or was it really about the good old videogamemonster, that still seems to be threatning, not only the youths, but the authority of art/entertainement reviewers? My guess is, this was the first time you saw a unfamiliar subject as a bad thing in documentary, as it usually is the reason they are made. And McDonalds and obiesity reference? You could just said straight that they corrupt the youth, who instead of watching the all the great films they produce nowdays, some even in 3D, they make or play such a atrocities that even the moviecritics shake their heads! I know it's a subject, that in some of us it still forces out the "Who's the Jock now" attitude, but you don't really need the quotation marks when saying connection. Well, the empowering feeling of young people taking the old people highstand is something that we all probably have to get through, so we can become the old young people again. At least you can say it in Villages voice. :)
