A Good Day to Die Hard, and to Die Alone

When John McClane lost his family, the movies lost much of John McClane

At this point Willis could be delivering that monologue in almost any of his action films. Where McClane began as a particular man with a unique personality and his own set of problems, the series has hollowed him out, turning him into a generic hero who can be dropped into any situation to say his catchphrase at least once per film with the predictability of a pull-string toy.

That doesn't mean the Die Hards have gotten bad. To the last, they're glossy, big-budget action films crafted with care and built around this most charismatic of movie stars. But to revisit them is to see a series that's lost sight of what set it apart in the first place. Maybe A Good Day to Die Hard—which this time teams McClane up with his estranged son—will change that. Maybe it will be as much about forging bonds as dodging bullets and make McClane back into a character we might feel for. It's a long shot at this point, but he's beat the odds before.

« Previous Page
 |
 
1
 
2
 
All
 
My Voice Nation Help
3 comments
jocosity
jocosity

This is the first Die Hard film that I refuse to see. The first really blew me away, the second was fun and engaging but I needed two viewings of the third to appreciate it. The fourth was absolute crap. McClane should've killed Justin Long for being the most annoying character since Jar Jar Binks. Too much CGI action and too many implausible moments. Shame because you would have thought that Willis has enough clout to get a Die Hard film made the way it should be done (with a proper script and director).

Michael

www.maidsalamode.com

 

Now Showing

Find capsule reviews, showtimes & tickets for all films in town.

Powered By VOICE Places

Box Office

Scores provided by Rotten Tomatoes

Join My Voice Nation for free stuff, film info & more!

Loading...