It's hard to enjoy most remakes unless you can put the original out of your head to avoid comparisons. Here, comparisons are the whole point. If those kids had been obsessed with Clint Eastwood's Firefox instead of Raiders, would you really be able to sit through the whole thing? Similarly, Van Sant had to choose a film as well known as Psycho to give us the surreal experience of watching a film we've already seen, but different.

Hitchcock built Psycho on surprises (spoiler -- Marion Crane dies and Norman Bates did it), but the remake knows you know what's going on. Think of the scene where Marion (originally Janet Leigh, now Anne Heche) goes into her motel room and Norman (formerly Anthony Perkins, now Vince Vaughn) spies on her through a peephole. In one of Van Sant's most notorious modifications, we can hear Norman whacking it below camera while he spies on her. That may seem to violate the rules of suspense that Hitchcock followed -- doesn't that seem like tipping the cards too much if Van Sant doesn't want us to know that Norman is a creep?

No, because of course we know who Norman Bates is. The movie is designed to not let you forget about Hitchcock. (He even cameos, chewing out Van Sant outside the window of the office where Marion works.) And don't worry; the remake didn't catch on in the popular consciousness. A decade and a half later, I think we can safely put away the fear of talking to some young person about Psycho and realizing they're picturing Vince Vaughn.

Vince Vaughn as Norman Bates in Psycho.
Vince Vaughn as Norman Bates in Psycho.
Vigo Mortensen as Sam Loomis and Julianne Moore as Lila Crane in Psycho.
Vigo Mortensen as Sam Loomis and Julianne Moore as Lila Crane in Psycho.

Details

Psycho (1998)
Directed by Gus Van Sant
Starring Vince Vaughn, Anne Heche, Julianne Moore, Viggo Mortensen and William H. Macy
Available on Netflix streaming



Subscribe to the Voice Film Club podcast

Related Stories

More About

Why it doesn't quite work

Maybe that's because Vaughn wasn't up to the task. It's an odd casting, but not as out-of-left-field at the time as it may seem now. Like Julianne Moore, who plays Lila Crane, Vaughn had done some TV shows, some acclaimed indies, and a Jurassic Park sequel. There was little sign that he would become the king of the pre- Hangover bro comedy with Old School and Wedding Crashers. I like his moronic smile as he watches Marion and her car sink into the swamp. Sometimes I like his nervous, nerdy giggle, but other times it seems forced, just like his heavy reliance on Perkins's gimmick of nibbling on little pieces of candy during conversations. He's taking a shot at it, but he's not hitting the target.

Maybe it all comes down to that performance; a more distinctive and interesting Norman might have warmed more people to the idea of the remake.

Heche fares better as Marion, always looking for ways to play the same material differently. Instead of staring nervously at the pile of money on her bed she smiles at it mischievously, thinks about it, stares at it, hesitates, bugs her eyes out in surprise at herself once she's tossed it into her purse. Later, she's playful as she searches for a place to hide it in her motel room. She looks excited instead of pained.

When Norman tells her about his taxidermy hobby, she laughs a little at its weirdness. When he tells her "a boy's best friend is his mother," she winces and practically rolls her eyes. Her reactions acknowledge his social awkwardness but make clear that she doesn't understand its significance. On the other hand, all this makes it less believable that Marion's conversation with Norman would inspire her to go back home and accept responsibility for her crime. Just changing a little piece of a movie can knock another piece out of place.

My favorite recasting is pre-Lord of the Rings Viggo Mortensen, replacing John Gavin as Marion's boyfriend, Sam Loomis. He seems like a good guy, content in his low-wage life at the hardware store but standup enough to take action when his girlfriend is in trouble. Mortensen is also manly enough to intimidate Norman, who he suspects stole Marion's money, essential given Vaughn's larger stature (and the impossibility of matching Perkins's nervous chewing and tapping in that scene).

Other fine casting includes Philip Baker Hall as the sheriff and Robert Forster as the psychiatrist, really selling the explanatory monologue at the end with a more naturalistic delivery than Simon Oakland in the original. Maybe the difficulty of recasting is celebrity, not talent. Seeing solid character actors of today replace their counterparts from yesterday feels more natural than seeing stars filling in for stars.

Why it's still worth your time

Once you have your new cast playing the same characters, saying mostly the same lines, with the same music playing, sometimes with the same camera angles and edits, you still don't necessarily have the same movie. Van Sant's experiment raises some fascinating questions: Can the magic of great cinema survive a piece-by-piece rebuild? I guess not. Is the undeniable strength of the individual elements (the story, the storytelling, the characters, the score) enough to survive a reshuffling? Not really. Can a director be disciplined enough to re-create every single shot of somebody else's movie? In Van Sant's case, the answer is no. Even in the iconic shower scene he follows the Hitchcock template to a point, then can't resist throwing in cutaways to storm clouds and a close-up of Marion's pupil dilating, putting an extra spin on the pull out from her eye, taking out a cut to the shower head so we move from the dead body to the money to the window in one continuous shot.

« Previous Page
 |
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
All
 
Next Page »
 
My Voice Nation Help
13 comments
Jeff Bradley
Jeff Bradley

Glad for a review to show I'm not psycho for seeing this movie as an "experiment". I saw it though as an observation of movie-making in the early 60's verses the late 90's and questioning the idea of ANY movie being considered "timeless". Van Sant's version demonstrated how "dated" Hitchcock's had become, even though the newer was practically the exact same. I always found it ironic also that both movies made about the same amount of box office - though Hitchcock's was a huge hit but by the late 90's that amount was flop level. Movies are ultimately made for the relevancy of the audience of their time. That they become something considered "timeless" is an utter fluke and any moviemaker that thinks they're creating something lasting with certainty is ultimately just - well, a little mad.

Anthony Johnson
Anthony Johnson

I saw this when it first came out but I have no plans to revisit it. Fool me once and all that. The theater was pretty full and I just remember almost everybody sort of derisively laughing at the masturbation scene. Says it all, really.

R.l. Procter
R.l. Procter

There is only one Psycho worth watching. This isn't it.

Scott Conners
Scott Conners

rented it once and don't even remember if I got through it, ill conceived vanity project

Konstantin Vilenchitz
Konstantin Vilenchitz

"PYSCHO". Fifteen years ago the Village Voice still held up. Why it doesn't now is less of a surprise.

James Martin
James Martin

Still holds up? Still? This article was unreadable after 4 paragraphs... much like the movie was unwatchable...

Jan Grygoriew
Jan Grygoriew

Thank you, thank you! Finally some words of praise for this underrated experiment.

Spencer Tiberius Rappaport
Spencer Tiberius Rappaport

right after moore was in Jurassic Park 2, Heche was a name from volcano and ellen's first "outed" girlfriend, vince vaughn actually ACTING in a real movie! Classic.

 

Now Showing

Find capsule reviews, showtimes & tickets for all films in town.

Powered By VOICE Places

Around The Web

Box Office

Scores provided by Rotten Tomatoes

Join My Voice Nation for free stuff, film info & more!

Loading...