Just So Much Master Debating on Iraq
Iraq: We broke it, we own it.
Or, rather, we should own it. But judging from the Democratic presidential candidates' debate last night in New Hampshire, there's still too much arguing about who's responsible.
Too bad the debate wasn't moderated by Tony Cordesman, the D.C.-based analyst who has made more sense on Iraq during the past five years than most people. He calls the Iraq debacle "the Pottery Barn issue." Actually, he credits Colin Powell for that phrase.
Cordesman is no peacenik. He's a specialist in Iraq and military affairs. In his latest rap on Iraq — you can listen to the May 29 analysis here, courtesy of the Center for Strategic & International Studies — Cordesman noted:
Keep that in mind as you read about last night's debate.
The die was cast back in October 2002, so Hillary Clinton and John Edwards have a lot to answer for — both supported Bush's insane war resolution. Barack Obama, who was still just a candidate for the Senate back in the fall of 2002, was outspoken against the war. He can't be blamed for it.
And when he gave a stirring speech at the Democratic National Convention in the summer of 2004, the networks didn't even air it.
Edwards and Clinton both supported Bush on that fateful day in October 2002. And it was merely laughable that Clinton defended her vote last night by calling it "sincere." Never trust anything a pol says when he or she accompanies it with the words "sincere" or "frankly."
Still, though, the problem is now: We broke Iraq and we own it. Or at least we have to own up to it. That means we can't simply pull out as fast as we can. It means we have to fix what we broke. With diplomatic solutions. As Cordesman said, it's just the right thing to do.
So hold your applause for the first presidential candidate who dares to make that point.
Get the ICYMI: Today's Top Stories Newsletter
Catch up on the day's news and stay informed with our daily digest of the most popular news, music, food and arts stories in New York, delivered to your inbox.