Secret Angel Still Wants to Save St. Brigid's
—for now—at St. Brigid's,
by an anonymous "angel" to either repair or buy the Avenue B church in order to save it.
An attorney for the donor, Gary Kravetz, said his client was “absolutely still interested” in preserving the so-called Famine Church--even though its 158-year-old stained glass has been shattered, its organ dismantled, and the gothic reredos (altar screen)--hand-carved by church architect Patrick Keely himself—appears to have been hacked off.
Kravetz said his client first offered to donate a large sum to fix that big crack that opened up on the north wall. When that was rejected, the donor offered to buy the church outright and turn it into cultural/educational center.
Kravetz forwarded along this statement issued on behalf of his client back in June:
"My client believes that St. Brigid's Church is an extremely important piece of New York, American, and Catholic history. He hopes that his resources can be of use in preserving it as a testament to the faith of impoverished immigrants escaping both famine and restrictions on their religion. He respectfully asks that decision makers at the archdiocese engage with him to see if a winning outcome is possible for the archdiocese, the neighborhood of St. Brigid's, and for historic preservation."
Though the cultural center concept was never fleshed out, presumably it could have celebrated both Irish Americans and the many other immigrant groups who found sanctuary there (St. Brigid's was reportedly the first church in the U.S. to have a Ukrainian mass, for instance).
Officials at the Archdiocese say the only written offer they received was to buy the church, and they don't want to sell.
"Our reason for being is not to create monuments," said spokesperson Joseph Zwilling. "If all we cared about is money, we would have sold it to this person who was offering to pay market value for it. That would have kept the preservationist crowd happy. But that's not what we're interested in. We're interested in serving the needs of the apeople consistent with the Catholic mission and the purposes of the Archdiocese of New York.”
So, they're tearing it down to serve the people? On the street, former parishioners, who for three years raised money at flea markets and bake sales in hopes of saving the building, weren't buying that logic. "It's a cash cow," said Carolyn Ratcliff, pointing to a proposal still under consideration to lease the property to Cabrini to build a senior nursing home. "It's a way of parking their asset. They give Cabrini a 99-year lease to run it with all these services, while the property continues to accrue in value, tax-free," Ratcliff contended.
A flyer posted on the fence surrounding the now boarded-up St. Brigid's on Avenue B (Photo: Sarah Ferguson)
Cabrini didn't get back to us, but in a follow-up interview, Zwilling said the Cabrini option was in fact “far from a done deal.”
So what does the Archdiocese plan to do with the property, then?
Zwilling says that's still undetermined. He noted that the decision to demolish St. Brigid's coincides with a sweeping "realignment" of church properties--which could result in the shuttering of several other downtown churches, including Mary Help of Christians on East 12th Street and the Church of the Nativity on Second Avenue.
“We are having a series of meetings to consider the entire realignment of the Archdiocese,” Zwilling explained. “When that's completed, we'll decide how best to use the properties to meet whatever needs are established.”
Zwilling said “it's possible” that some churches under realignment may ultimately be sold. But not St. Brigid's. "Cardinal Egan has already decided it won't ever be sold. It will be used for some church purpose," Zwilling insisted. "We just have not decided what that's going to be."
Zwilling also said he "can't explain" why in March 2004 the Archdiocese secured a permit to gut the existing church building and convert it into 29 apartments. "It's still a mystery to me, because housing has never been our intention there," said Zwilling. He said he "assumes" it was filed with the aim of creating senior housing, similar to that plan to convert St. Thomas the Apostle in Harlem that got shot down. But such housing was never "authorized" for St. Brigid's, Zwilling maintained.
Okay, but the idea that somebody in the Archdiocese apparently found at least the shell of St. Brigid's worth saving is, needless to say, intriguing.
Meanwhile, in a post to Power Plays, St. Brigid's former pastor Father Michael Conway said he never consented to the demolition. Here's his comment in full:
Mr. Zwilling's recollection of the discussions surrounding the decision in 2001 to cease using St. Brigid's church are quite different from mine.
I did agree with the Cardinal that for the sake of the safety of the parishioners we should stop using the building. I did not agree that the only option was that the building should be torn down. We subsequently explored many options until the archdiocese made the decision in 2004 that Mass would no longer be offered at St Brigid because of the clergy shortage and the availability of other area Catholic churches.
Just to set the record straight.
Posted by: Michael Conway at July 31, 2006 02:44 AM
Former parishioners will be holding another candlelight vigil for St. Brigid's tonight at 8 p.m., corner of Avenue B and 8th Street.
Comments
Regarding that flyer: Considering that there's quite a bit of doubt as to whether St. Brigid actually existed, I don't imagine the cardinal is too worried about this particular point of his afterlife accountability.
Posted by: Ted Olsen at August 3, 2006 4:38 PM
The Catholic Church needs to make clear what is their mission. Apparently they're saying it is to serve the needs of the people- OUR people, in the Lower East Side are asking them to Save the Church- unless they don't view us as people, I can't understand why they're moving forward with this plan to demolish the church, espite our NEED to have it be preserved. The Catholic church should not turn their backs on their followers, on a community that has served and been served by them-Do they honestly want to get into Singer practice's of development?
Posted by: Melissa at August 3, 2006 5:22 PM
As a real estate professional in NYC. I believe the Archdiocese cannot have it both ways. If there is a citizen willing to buy this property and keep it a church or simply pay to repair, the Archdiocese owes him consideration. These people deserve to keep their church! If the NYC Archdicese would like to ignore there followers and treat spritual buildings as real estate assets-Start paying taxes.
I would be very interested in putting a team together to file an eminent domain proceeding.
Posted by: Deep Throat at August 3, 2006 9:23 PM
Please, lets get real. Because property on the East Side is hot right now, developers are vulturing the areas that are vulnerable.
Displacing low income people to make way for their money making projects for the wealthy.
And also, the Archdiocese is in courtship with these developers so yes, lets get real.
Posted by: Arawakan at August 4, 2006 10:04 AM
It is not real to simply accept anything the Archdiocese wishes to do with it's property. The donations of parishioners supported and built churches throughout the world. 95% of structures with damage can be repaired. There is a person willing to pay this cost. There are serious arguments here. The Archdiocese does not have legal carte blanche. If the right parties were brought together including the City. There could be a simple solution.
Posted by: Deep Throat at August 5, 2006 11:57 AM
Well, the candlelight vigil Thursday the 10th was rained out, but there is another scheduled for next Thursday the 17th at 8 PM.
I've written several letters commenting on the case of St. Brigoid's,including one to the New York Times in response to their article about the demolition. In the letter, which was not published, I remark:
"I am most puzzled that the Church, which pocketed the over $100,000 raised by the parishioners for repairs, and claims poverty as its chief reason for being unable to repair the back wall, did not proceed with more care, in order to conserve and even sell the fixtures from the church - if they really needed to raise money."
I understand the demolition was largely an act of spite - "if I can't have ya, baby, nobody's gonna have ya." Apparently the Order of Hibernians had expressed interest in the stained-glass windows, manufactured in Belgium in the mid-19th century and valued at possibly $100,000 each; naturally, the church's only recourse was to destroy the windows.
This also begs the question: why is the Church choosing to destroy its own history?
Posted by: Frank Language at August 11, 2006 6:54 PM
People should stand up to protect the jewels of the City from the developers. St. Brigid, Our Lady of Vilnius are real monuments to the spirit of Bew York people and should be preserved and protected from the wrecking ball.
Posted by: Saulius Simoliunas at January 16, 2007 12:36 PM
What happened with St. Brigid's? I've seen no news coverage in a year. Please, did the church live or die? Was the Cardinal selling that property to a developer to raise settlement money for child abuse cases or something? Or was it just a case of the powerful and corrupt at it again?
Posted by: Kathleen O'Brien Blair at August 16, 2007 4:01 PM
Post a comment