On the Subject of Me
A cozy, affirmative fantasy, Me Myself I relies on shopworn metaphysics to illustrate any number of cockeyed truisms about destiny and regretor, more likely, to disguise their sheer banality. The movie collapses philosophical conundrums it barely understands into a fixed smile and a pat on the back: Whatever choice you make, it insists with the sinister, obstinate vapidity of a self-help manual, is the right one. In short, its answer to "What if?" is "Who cares?"
Pamela (Rachel Griffiths) is a driven Sydney journalist, a thirtyish single woman in the Ally/Bridget moldangsty, mouthy, unlucky in loveand first-time writer-director Pip Karmel outlines her protagonist's initial plight in crude, smeared shorthand. A colleague plonks down an award on Pamela's desk in the first five minutes; she runs around busily investigating a story ("It's about girls today," she announces with mystifying smugness). But her personal life is a washshe celebrates her birthday with an abortive blind date, then goes home to cry over an old boyfriend. Just in time, a freak accident sends the borderline-suicidal Pamela crashing through a sliding door on the space-time continuum; she ends up face-to-face with a different version of herselfmarried to the one that got away and raising three brats with him in suburbia. What follows is a grindingly obvious mix of mild fish-out-of-water comedy and grass-is-always-greener awakening.
A versatile, unshowy actor, Griffiths keeps the movie watchable, but Karmel elbows her screenplay's questionable assumptions into bold relief. Me Myself I positions itself as a women's film, but its attempts to explore the tensions between career and family are hamstrung by its central gimmick, which presents the two as mutually exclusive. The movie's title says plentysupposedly evocative of Pamela's identity crisis but more suggestive of terminal self-absorption. Me Myself I promotes the kind of skewed introspection that has time only for upliftit's a feel-good, fatalist placebo, and the coating of New Age goop makes it even more difficult to swallow.
A quickie release timed to coincide with the film version of American Psycho (due in theaters next week), This Is Not an Exitsubtitled The Fictional World of Bret Easton Ellis (why not Me Myself I?) and produced for British TV in 1998is in fact the worst imaginable form of publicity for Mary Harron's already much beleaguered movie. Bret reads from his bookspoolside, as if for the first timewhile the camera zooms in for a close-up of his mouth; Bret discusses his formative years (words like alienation and aloneness feature prominently); Bret runs the gamut of pretentious-celebrity-brat doublespeak, from false modesty to righteous victimhood. The dramatizations of passages from Ellis's novelswith a "cast" that includes Rachel Weisz, Dechen Thurman as Patrick Bateman, and for no reason at all, John Bryan, the man known exclusively for sucking Fergie's toeshave an airless, tone-deaf, brain-dead quality that may or may not be intentional.
Get the Film Club Newsletter
Stay up to date on the best new movies with our critics' latest reviews, interviews and trailers for the films coming to a theater near you each week.
More Film News
- Alex Gibney: Steve Jobs Had the 'Focus of a Monk — Without the Empathy'
- Netflix’s 'Narcos' Tries to Be 'The Wire' for Colombia’s Drug War
- ‘The Second Mother’ Offers a Sharp Brazilian Take on the Upstairs/Downstairs Drama
- The Predictability of Teary Kids Doc 'My Voice, My Life' Doesn't Make It Any Less Powerful