Talking Tire Trouble With Rubber Director Quentin Dupieux
Until now, quirky French artist, electro-house musician, and filmmaker Quentin Dupieuxmore commonly known as Mr. Oizohad reached his widest audience with a series of Levis commercials featuring a head-banging yellow puppet. His career should only get stranger with his Cannes-approved feature Rubber, a truly WTF comic thriller about a tire that springs to life and rolls through the desert, blowing peoples heads up with its psychokinetic powers. I sat down with Dupieux near Chelsea to discuss his reason for making a film that boasts having no reason.
The premise seems like the result of a Mad Libs exercise. Why a tire? At first, I wanted to make a story called Day of the Cubes, about a space invasion. One day, people wake up and there are cubes floating everywhere. I started to write this and did some tests, but it was boring to shoot empty spaces and then create the whole thing on a computer. I decided I should go back to something I know: this commercial with a puppeta real object that you can shoot and hire someone off-frame to operate by remote control. I had to think about something that has emotion, and I instantly had a vision of a tire slowly following someone.
But with no face, isnt it hard to convey emotion beyond movement and speed? It was almost impossible to give it intentions. Because of its size and the way it stands, the only reference we had was a dog. When its watching the girl in the shower, its leaning in a little bit to push the door, just like a dog. After that, theres not much you can do. It has no face, so when it sees a plastic bottle and decides to squish it, the audience makes the movie because they create the feeling.
Within the film, there are spectators watching the events unfold, plus an opening monologue about why this story has no reason. Did you always plan the film to be so self-aware? Yes. I started with the tire story and then had to decide, Why is the tire alive? I thought it was terrible to explain this, so I needed to create a guide to avoid questions like this because I knew people were aware. I wrote this monologue to give a tone, some rules, and basically invite the audience: Come in, its gonna be fun. I didnt want to make Halloween with a tire, and I didnt want to [use this premise] without making fun of it. So the absurdity of the tire is one thing, but theres another absurdity: people watching the movie with binoculars in the middle of nowhere. I thought, OK, I have good theater here. I can play with my dolls, and that was exciting.
Do you feel theres thought or memory in lifeless objects? Im wondering about this chair, for example. What is it like to be a chair made of wood? I dont know. The idea [for Rubber] was good because theres something dangerous about a tire.
Get the Film & TV Newsletter
Stay up to date on the best new movies with our critics' latest reviews, interviews and trailers for the films coming to a theater near you each week.
More Film News
- Scott Adkins Plays a Badass Actually Named ‘Colt McReady’ In the Effective ‘Close Range’
- Meet the Pole Who Tried to Warn the World About the Holocaust in ‘Karski & the Lords...
- Jane Fonda Faced Down the Seventies and a Killer in Pakula’s Masterful ‘Klute’
- He’ll Get Your Head Shaking: Surveying the Start of Chung Mong-hong’s (Likely) Great...