village voice
RSS/Podcast feed for Village Voice News Status Ain't Hood
The All-Dirty Edition
Popped! Music Festival
Enter to win a trip to this year’s 3-day POPPED! Music festival in the Philadelphia, June 20-22nd!
Vlada Lounge
Enter to win a $50 gift certificate to Vlada Lounge!
Alice Smith
Enter to win tickets to see Alice Smith on Thursday, May 22nd at the Highline Ballroom!
SoHo Stroll 2008
Enter to win a SoHo Stroll 2008 broom signed by James Blunt and designed and decorated by the New York Academy of Art!
Elia Salon
Enter to Win A Hair Package Special by the BEST DOMINICAN SALON for you & a friend!
Lit Lounge
Enter for complimentary admission to see Power Solo from Denmark with Band Antenna, Sea That Dried Up, and Chem Trail at Lit Lounge!
United Artists
Enter to win a 90th Anniversary United Artists DVD prize package!
Iron & Silk
Enter to win 5 personal training sessions at Iron & Silk Fitness!
News
Runnin' Scared
Drawn and Quartered
Sidewalk Chalk Artist Fights NYPD Harassment
by Maria Luisa Tucker
January 22nd, 2008 12:00 AM

Ellis Gallagher was locked up for 17 hours because of a chalk drawing like this one.
photo: Staci Schwartz
As he crouched down on the Cobble Hill sidewalk, Ellis Gallagher used a piece of chalk to outline an elegant shadow cast by a streetlight. The 34-year-old artist is known in Brooklyn for his chalk outlines of mailboxes, fences, bicycles, and the like. On this October night, he was accompanied by a cameraman filming a profile of him for Channel 13's New York Voices (online at thirteen.org/nyvoices). Soon after the camera started rolling, Gallagher received his harshest review. A cop car rolled up, and the film crew caught bits of the conversation between two officers and Gallagher:

"What's that for?" a female officer is heard asking.

"I was going to write my name," Gallagher responded.

"So, you were going to write your name on the pavement?"

"Yes."

"Like graffiti?" she urged.

"No, no—I sign my pieces."

The officers arrested him for making graffiti. When Gallagher protested, saying that he didn't understand why he was being taken in, one of the cops told him: "We'll make you understand when we get to the precinct."

The charges were eventually dropped, but not before he spent 17 hours in jail with men who had been caught smoking cigarettes in the subway and jumping the turnstile. When he told them he was there for sidewalk chalk art, "people thought it was a complete joke," he says. But Gallagher sees no humor in it.

Last week, Gallagher filed a notice of claim, notifying the city of his intent to sue for false arrest, unlawful imprisonment, and pain and suffering. He is seeking $5 million in damages.

Over the years, Gallagher has had his share of run-ins with cops—he used to be a true graffiti artist and was arrested multiple times for tagging. However, after a fellow graffiti artist and friend was struck by a train and killed, Gallagher put away the spray paint forever. Now he shows paintings at Bushwick's Ad Hoc Art Gallery and is working on two books inspired by graffiti and his chalk shadow outlines. But the majority of his work is still on the street—now in a water-soluble medium that, his lawyer asserts, is perfectly legal.

Gallagher says his $5 million complaint is not about the money—he knows it's unlikely that he'll be able to squeeze much out of the city—but about the principle. "I want peace of mind—no fear of arrest or harassment, freedom of expression, knowing that I can go to sleep at night doing what I do without fear of being incarcerated," he says. "I think [the NYPD] should reassess their priorities and not waste taxpayer dollars on policing people for chalking sidewalks." Which is apparently something they've been doing quite a bit of over the years.

Hani Shihada, another of the city's sidewalk artists, says he's suffered police harassment for years. Shihada, best known for his sidewalk replicas of Sistine Chapel scenes, says he has been taken to court more than 20 times, and each time the charges were dismissed. "I bring pictures of my work and show the judges, and the judges smile," he says.

Even children aren't immune from the chalk police. Last year, the Sanitation Department demanded that six-year-old Natalie Shae remove her "graffiti"—sidewalk chalk doodles on her own stoop—and made international headlines.

Meanwhile, the harassment against Gallagher went on. Soon after his night in jail, he was in Boreum Hill outlining the shadow of a light post in front of a bar. As several customers watched him work, the cops arrived to put the kibosh on his chalk-handling once more. The confrontation eventually drew four police cars and ended only when Gallagher agreed to wash away his drawing.

Paul Hale, Gallagher's attorney, says the city's interpretation of what constitutes graffiti is skewed. Under state law, graffiti is defined as the "etching, painting, covering, drawing upon or otherwise placing of a mark upon public or private property with intent to damage such property." Chalk, Hale points out, doesn't damage anything.

At least one New York judge has made the distinction between true graffiti and sidewalk chalk. Just one day before Gallagher was arrested, a federal judge found a Syracuse man not guilty of vandalism after he was arrested for writing messages in chalk to Hillary Clinton in front of a federal building there. Chalk, the judge opined, doesn't damage property and therefore can't be considered graffiti under state law.

New York City, however, has its own defacement ordinance that could still get some chalkers in trouble for simply leaving a mark on sidewalks or buildings. Echoing the words of graffiti artist Ramo from New York's classic hip-hop flick Beat Street, Gallagher says: "If art is a crime, may God forgive me."

More Runnin' Scared
Hitchens on Spitzer's Lust
Why else do men run for higher office?

Eliot Spitzer's Crack Tax
Wait, it's not what you think

The NYPD Ignores Leap Day Crimes to Keep Stats Low
CompStat might not count a February 29th murder, but the neighborhood does

Parole Deal Dissolves
The end of Pataki's throw-away-the-key policy hits a 35-year-old snag

Minnesota Cops Promise a Kinder, Gentler RNC
So why are they stocking up on stun guns?

Add a Comment

Not ? Login as a different user.

All reader comments are subject to our Terms of Use. By submitting a comment, you acknowledge that you have reviewed and agree to these Terms of Use.

Login or Register

Login or register to have a chance to win Free Stuff, subscribe to newsletters and much more!

Login Register
Hellenbach on Thu Feb 7, 2008, 09:49, says:
Look... I am am all for art in every last one of its forms and inceptions. At the outset of this article I was all for this particular artist as well. While his medium is not original (there is another brilliant artist doing 3 dimensional sidewalk art in Europe, shadows and all), it is still highly entertaining and appealing to the eye. So, yeah, I was all up in arms over the oppression of art by a police department filled with people who are not smart enough to know the difference between The Odyssey and The Iliad, let alone carry guns and have authority to steal another's freedom! (Yes, I do believe that the standards should be at least that high for those charged with our safety and "peace keeping.")

But then I read further and got to the litigious intentions of the artist. COME ON GUY! Suing for WHAT exactly?!?! You were breaking the law. You are supposed to embrace the vandal in you. You are carrying a mighty bright torch while walking in the footsteps of such giants as Basquiat, Haring, Fairy and Bansky. Act accordingly homeboy. Those usual suspects would have rather bought cheap canvas' than seek monetary vengeance for something that was an intrinsic aspect of their art form -- danger. I am gonna' guess that you are not from around these parts, huh? Likely just one more trust fund vacationer from the vast void that is the upper-middle class Mid-West. For brevity's sake I end this with a cliché that actually hurts my own ears but is quite appropriate considering... Keep it real man! Keep it real.
manjisan on Mon Feb 4, 2008, 20:40, says:
what do you consider good art then? Nicely written article to remind us of how truly free we are.
Robert on Mon Feb 4, 2008, 10:07, says:
Ellis makes ugly drawings. He has no eye for art. No talent. No feeling for it at all. His stuff is offensive, not because it's transgressive, which it isn't, but because it's ugly and lame. He should have his little thumbs chopped off. I live in the nabe and I wash his stuff away whenever I can.

The Village Voice Ad Index
The Village Voice Summer Guide 2008

» click here to see more...

The Village Voice Summer 2008 Education Supplement

» click here to see more...

The Village Voice Spring Arts Supplement

» click here to see more...