village voice
RSS/Podcast feed for Village Voice News Status Ain't Hood
The All-Dirty Edition
Vlada Lounge
Enter to win a $50 gift certificate to Vlada Lounge!
Alice Smith
Enter to win tickets to see Alice Smith on Thursday, May 22nd at the Highline Ballroom!
SoHo Stroll 2008
Enter to win a SoHo Stroll 2008 broom signed by James Blunt and designed and decorated by the New York Academy of Art!
Elia Salon
Enter to Win A Hair Package Special by the BEST DOMINICAN SALON for you & a friend!
Lit Lounge
Enter for complimentary admission to see Power Solo from Denmark with Band Antenna, Sea That Dried Up, and Chem Trail at Lit Lounge!
United Artists
Enter to win a 90th Anniversary United Artists DVD prize package!
Iron & Silk
Enter to win 5 personal training sessions at Iron & Silk Fitness!
News
Nat Hentoff
Will the Latest Jerusalem Bloodshed Be Followed By Talks or Intifada?
by Nat Hentoff
March 25th, 2008 12:00 AM

The late Ala Abu Dhaim was a 25-year-old deliveryman in Jerusalem. A Palestinian Arab with Israeli citizenship, he lived with his family in East Jerusalem, and so was free to travel into West Jerusalem, where, on the night of March 6, he used his Kalashnikov assault rifle to shoot to death eight Israeli students attending a yeshiva, a religious school.

In his neighborhood, he was known as a gentle fellow who was looking forward to getting married this summer. But his family says that the recent retaliatory Israeli attacks in Gaza, which killed nearly 120 Palestinian Arabs, including children, had infuriated him.

Dhaim's revenge seemed at first to be a solo operation, but on March 7, Hamas—after initially simply congratulating him—stepped forward to claim credit for the executions, according to a Reuters report. Whatever the truth of the case, with many Israelis now fearful that a third Palestinian intifada could soon begin, ushering in a new wave of suicide bombings, it's clear that this first major murderous assault inside Jerusalem in four and a half years could well forebode many more human body parts strewn on the city's streets.

When I first heard of the killings of the mostly teenage Israeli students, I remembered the worldwide shock and revulsion in February 1994, when an Israeli settler on the West Bank, Baruch Goldstein, rushed into the Ibrahimi mosque in Hebron and shot to death 29 Muslims as they were deep in prayer.

In his new book, A History of Modern Israel (Cambridge University Press), Colin Shindler, a historian at the University of London, notes that the Goldstein atrocity "radicalized more Palestinian Arabs and persuaded Hamas to extend its campaign into Israeli proper [with] suicide bombers."

And some radical Jews, venerating Goldstein's willingness to sacrifice his life for a Greater Israel, were strengthened in their own extremism by his example—including young Yigal Amir, who assassinated Israeli prime minister Yitzhak Rabin for being "soft" on the Palestinians. (On Amir's bookshelf was a collection of essays honoring Baruch Goldstein; Rabin had shared the 1994 Nobel Peace Prize with Yasir Arafat and Shimon Peres for their attempts to reach a peace agreement.)

After Goldstein's barbarous killing of Muslims at prayer, he was reviled by just about every sector of Israeli society, including those most unforgivingly hostile to Israelis working for peace.

This year, after Ala Abu Dhaim cut off the brief lives of those eight yeshiva students, there was jubilation in the streets of Gaza, with thousands of Palestinians celebrating and shooting off their guns in satisfaction. And at the mourning tent in Dhaim's East Jerusalem home, waving over the heads of more than 100 grieving Arabs, were the green flags of Hamas.

Yet despite the burning anger among Israelis, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert—resisting the inflamed demands of some Israelis that he send the full punitive force of the Israeli army into Gaza—insists that he will not abandon his negotiations with Mahmoud Abbas of Fatah. In a fierce contrary obbligato, hundreds of ultra-Orthodox Israelis shouted "Death to the Arabs!" outside the yeshiva on the night of the murders—and Rabbi David Shalem, the director of the Institute of Talmud Studies at the yeshiva, yelled to the press outside (including a New York Times reporter): "Let the government go to hell! Write that down! Let the government go to hell!"

All of this brought me back to when I was a child in Boston—some 20 years before Israel was established in 1948 as a Jewish state. Almost as soon as I could walk, I joined other Jewish boys on the streets of my neighborhood carrying a blue-and-white tin container, collecting donations to plant trees in Palestine, which would somehow hasten the coming of a Jewish homeland. (Soon the Nazis would try very hard to remove the need for such a place.)

I had no idea back then, knocking on my neighbors' doors with my little container, of the continuous bloodshed that would be generated by the ever-perilous existence of the Jewish state. Over the years, I've read the histories by advocates on both sides, as well as the revisions of history (by Israelis as well as Arabs)—and I have come to understand certain deep grievances that have been spawned by "the Occupation," as have the Israeli Supreme Court and Israeli human-rights organizations.

Despite the new festering wounds in Gaza and Jerusalem, I am now somewhat encouraged by the wrenching realism—as reported in The Economist (March 8)—of "those Israelis who favor talks with Hamas," as loathsome as the prospect may well be to both sides. They include "former heads of all three of Israel's fabled and often deadly intelligence services: Ephraim Halevy [Mossad] . . . Shlomo Gazit [military intelligence] . . . and Ami Ayalon [Shin Bet, Israel's domestic-security network]."

As I indicated last week, there are also Palestinians—including some in Gaza who are not celebrating the murders of the yeshiva students—who want all the killing to stop. And there are Arab governments who fear that a wildfire of Israeli-Palestinian violence could begin to engulf them all, inciting Muslim fundamentalists and other resisters to rebel against the authoritarian governments in those states. Egypt, for instance, has met with a Hamas delegation to try to work out a cease-fire in Gaza.

There is also a potential scenario that The Economist calls "fanciful" at present, even though it "may become more realistic" over time: an agreement between the bristlingly hostile Hamas and Fatah organizations "to let Mr Abbas continue to negotiate with Israel, [while] both Palestinian parties would agree to hold new elections—and to respect their results."

More in line with the present grim reality is the reaction by Israeli citizen Moshed Harel, whose 15-year-old son was inside the Jerusalem yeshiva when Ala Abu Dhaim began firing randomly in the library. After waiting an agonizing half-hour to learn that his son was safe, Harel said heavily: "It's a long war. It didn't start today. It won't end tomorrow."

Across the street, a 19-year-old rabbinical student, Chaim Schur, told The Washington Post: "We just want to stop. We don't want to go on killing kids in Gaza. It's not our fault."

Some years ago, I was told that the trees we Boston kids helped to plant in Palestine—in the hopes of seeing a Jewish homeland there one day—have survived. For the sake of both Israelis and Palestinians, I hope they remain standing.

More Nat Hentoff
Will Christine Quinn Stand Up to Commissioner Kelly?
Two probable mayoral candidates have some unfinished business about school thugs

Getting Our Reputation Back
People around the world who aren’t our enemies now distrust us as allies

Is Obama's Constitution Strong Enough?
He stirs the crowds, but when will he tell them about their lost liberties?

What the CIA Had to Destroy
The many reasons this torture evidence was too hot to handle

Waterboarding the White House
Echoes of Watergate in the twilight of the Bush presidency

Add a Comment

Not ? Login as a different user.

All reader comments are subject to our Terms of Use. By submitting a comment, you acknowledge that you have reviewed and agree to these Terms of Use.

Login or Register

Login or register to have a chance to win Free Stuff, subscribe to newsletters and much more!

Login Register
Joe Havermann on Mon Mar 31, 2008, 22:02, says:
It is tiring to read Hentoff's insipid commentary. The entire settlement / colony of Hebron has erected a statue in honor of Goldstein; he is a martyr to those who are being supported by the Israeli government. Palestinians are living under occupation, which, as the previous writer notes, Hentoff routinely qualifies with 'scare quotes.' Apparently, the land occupied by Palestinian Arabs up until a mere fifty years ago, after my grandfather returned from World War II, is in dispute -- you know, because the Babylonians expelled the Jews 3000 years ago, according to oral tradition. No, I don't believe support the "destruction" of Israel -- political facts are political facts. And unfortunately for the Jewish "settlers" -- who explicitly support the colonization of what remains of Palestinian land, whose settlements (colonies) are heavily subsidized and guarded by the state of Israel, and greatly expanded under Barak -- the Palestinians are a political fact, too. A two-state solution is needed, in which the Israelis retreat to their internationally recognized borders. During the first intifada, Israel killed roughly twenty Palestinians for every Israeli killed; in the last intifada, when suicide bombings really first began to be used to terrorize the Israeli population, Israel was killing a mere three Palestinians for every Israeli. As Israel begins to heremetically seal Gaza's border -- after consciously cultivating a relationship with Gaza based on economic dependency -- as Gaza's economy collapses as a result of Israel's will, as Gazans are mowed down on the beach by Israeli helicopters, as they were not long ago -- the kill ratio might even approach a simple two-to-one: Israel kills two Palestians for every Israeli killed. That would be devastating for everyone who gives a damn about Israel, and everyone who cares about the Palestinians. And Hentoff will be there to assert that he has read both "sides," including that of those living under "'occupatin'," in quotes, and he will humanize the suffering of Israelis, while ignoring the very real suffering of Palestinians
theEye on Mon Mar 31, 2008, 09:15, says:
In two essays Hentoff writes of the " 'the occupation' ".

Evidently, like Donald Rumsfeld, Hentoff doesn't think there is an occupation. Or maybe he thinks that a different term should be used -- perhaps "anschluss".

One way or another, this is code speak for him. His pattern of villifying Palestinians en masse (e.g., suggesting -- falsely -- that all cheered the terrorist attack on the school, while exonerating a profoundly racist Israeli Jewish population in the case of Baruch Goldstein) indicates that he is like many pro-Israel advocates -- paying lipservice to Palestinian rights while in substance supporting Israeli crimes against humanity.
PeaceAtAllCosts on Thu Mar 27, 2008, 05:18, says:
Pure Crap.

The Arabs will stop at nothing to destroy Israel and kill her citizens.Smug, self hating Jews who comfortably live in Soho need not worry about being evicerated by Hekkbent Arabs.

Perhaps you should take your civilized diatribe to Hamas-Israelis have already bled enough.

The Village Voice Ad Index
The Village Voice Summer Guide 2008

» click here to see more...

The Village Voice Summer 2008 Education Supplement

» click here to see more...

The Village Voice Spring Arts Supplement

» click here to see more...