Arming Transit Workers With Stun Guns: Recipe For Disaster Or Necessary Safety Measure?
There's currently a bill in the New York State Legislature that would add transit workers to the list of New Yorkers authorized to have -- and use -- stun guns.
The bill was introduced by state Senator Eric Adams, a 22-year law enforcement veteran who spent six years working as an MTA cop. It's in response to an increase in attacks on MTA workers -- and a trip Adams took to China (more on that here). Oh, yeah -- a little union pressure may have played a role, too.
As Adams explained to us yesterday, there certainly are a lot of pros to giving transit workers a way to protect themselves, and commuters, against dangerous thugs -- he says transit workers having Tasers could even help thwart terrorist attacks, too (which may be a stretch).
As we explained to Adams yesterday, there also are a lot of cons to arming anyone with a stun gun.
Because they're considered "non-lethal," stun guns often are used rather liberally by law enforcement officials in situations where they don't really need to be used -- and often times there are fatal consequences.
Take the case of Marty Atencio, for example, a military veteran who died after getting Tased by several cops in Phoenix, Arizona, last year.
Atencio already was in custody when he was Tased -- in fact, he was in jail and alone in a room with about a dozen cops, at the time. When he was wrestled to the ground and zapped by police, Atencio was standing with his arms crossed -- in a jail, no less. In other words, he wasn't going anywhere, and he didn't appear to be a physical threat to anyone around him -- why not just toss him in a cell and let him calm down? See video of Atencio's death here.
Then there was the case of a 10-year-old Arkansas girl who was electrocuted by a law enforcement official after kicking a cop in the groin. If a cop needs a Taser to subdue a 10-year-old girl, he/she shouldn't be a cop.
There's no shortage of horror stories about overzealous law enforcement officials using Tasers -- when a lot of times they didn't need to -- with fatal consequences.
As the saying goes, stun guns don't kill people, overzealous, trigger-happy, Taser-toting cops kill people -- and it often costs taxpayers more than a few bucks in lawsuits.
Of course, the vast majority of police officers don't abuse their Tasers -- and they're used (as they should be) only as a last resort. However, some do, and it seems like arming transit workers with potentially lethal weapons could be a recipe for disaster.
We want to know what you think, though -- Tasers for transit workers: recipe for disaster or necessary safety measure?
Cast your vote below.
Get the This Week's Top Stories Newsletter
Every week we collect the latest news, music and arts stories — along with film and food reviews and the best things to do this week — so that you’ll never miss Village Voice's biggest stories.
- 'Convicting Peter Liang Is Not a Conviction of the NYPD,' Prosecutor Concludes
Tue., Feb. 16, 7:00pm
Wed., Feb. 17, 7:00pm
Wed., Feb. 17, 8:00pm
Wed., Feb. 17, 8:00pm
- Group for Homeless LGBT Youth Moves a Step Closer to Buying Terrible Anti-Gay Church...
- Voice Letters: Readers Share Their Energy Service Company Horror Stories