Deconstructing the Bush Agenda on the Economics of War
Some discouraging facts: The U.S. has been spending $4 billion a month in Iraq since January 2003. Remember Afghanistan? We know it was never Bush's top priority, but $900 million a month? And here? Bush has turned a10-year $5.6 trillion surplus into a 10-year $5.2 trillion deficit, gutted the Social Security trust fund, and significantly cut job-training programs for low-income and jobless workers despite his latest budget claimsnot that it matters. Between 2001 and 2003, 2.4 million jobs were eliminated, according to the Economic Policy Institute. We've gained a million since, but is that all that comforting? At least 8 million people are still jobless. A solution: More than 1,000 troops have died in Iraq who have to be replaced, right? So if we keep sending soldiers to die in ill-advised wars for the next four years, we should be OK. Giving us other possible recourses are Salon columnist Joe Conason (Big Lies: The Right-Wing Propaganda Machine and How It Distorts the Truth) and Boston Globe columnist James Carroll (Crusade: Chronicles of an Unjust War) in panel discussion with the New School's World Policy Institute director Stephen Schlesinger. It would sure help if some on-the-fence voters came along, but if not, liberals can feast on deconstruction of the Bush agenda (still insisting on foreign policy over free-falling economy). Pace Derrida, every initiative is already deconstructedbut we appreciate someone pointing it out.
Get the ICYMI: Today's Top Stories Newsletter Our daily newsletter delivers quick clicks to keep you in the know
Catch up on the day's news and stay informed with our daily digest of the most popular news, music, food and arts stories in New York, delivered to your inbox.