Ramarley Graham case; Grand Jury Votes Not to Indict Cop, Feds to Review Case
Ramarley Graham's parents, Frank Graham and Constance Malcolm, criticize the grand jury's decision
A Bronx grand jury opted not to indict Police Officer Richard Haste for fatally shooting unarmed teenager Ramarley Graham after chasing the youth into his parents' home in February, 2012. The Justice Department is going to review the case for possible civil rights violations.
After the grand jury's decision came down, protesters took to the streets outside the Bronx courthouse. Graham's parents, meanwhile, told reporters that the justice system had failed them.
Frank Graham talks with a community affairs officer from the NYPD during protests that followed the grand jury decision
Graham was 18 when he was shot by Haste, who had chased him into the apartment bathroom, seeking him as a supposed drug suspect. Haste has told investigators that he thought Graham was armed.
Bronx District Attorney Robert Johnson said this: "We are surprised and shocked by the Grand Jury's finding of no criminal liability in the death of Ramarley Graham. We are saddened for the family of the deceased young man and still believe that the court's dismissal of the original indictment was overly cautious."
And a spokesman for Communities United for Police Reform (CPR) said this: "The failure to indict the officer responsible for unjustifiably killing Ramarley Graham is a complete miscarriage of justice and adds insult to injury for his family."
Get the This Week's Top Stories Newsletter
Every week we collect the latest news, music and arts stories — along with film and food reviews and the best things to do this week — so that you’ll never miss Village Voice's biggest stories.
- We Found the Most Fascinating (and Depressing) Site on the Internet
- This Brooklyn Local is Making a Web Series about Growing Weed
- New York City's Food Pantries Are Struggling to Keep Up With a Growing Demand For Meals