The New Yorker's Nick Denton Profile: What Did Everyone Think?
Well, last night, The New Yorker dropped their long-anticipated (at least by us) profile of Gawker Media publisher Nick Denton. We did the quotability run-down, but: how're the reactions? And what did Denton himself think?
Blogger and onetime Gawker Night Editor Anthony De Rosa:
Former "Gawker Mascot" Andrew Krucoff:
Former Jezebel writer Megan Carpentier:
The Awl Co-Founder and Former Two-Time Gawker.com Editor Choire Sicha:
As with all previous Denton profiles--and it's not a fault of these profiles or the writers, I don't think!--you will come searching for a "why" and you may again come away frustrated on a quick read. And yet still, when this one is given a sort of slow, math-problem like reading, you feel as if there's an answer just forming in your peripheral vision. You can sort of see this shiny correct solution hovering there for a second.
Current Gawker.com writer Max Read:
Gawker politics contributor (and former Dukakis staffer) Peter Feld:
Founding Gawker.com editor Elizabeth Spiers:
It's not bad, but it's kind of weird. It spends a lot of time talking about how scandalous (or non-scandalous) Gawker is and ends up feeling like a CJR piece wrapped in anecdotes about Nick's various Asperger's-y moments. A) I don't think anyone really finds Gawker scandalous anymore, and B) it's not an interesting discussion, especially when it's not the only outlet that traffics in scandal at this point. It's a discussion that would have been had (and was) in 2004 or so.
Denton-friend and Reuters blogger Felix Salmon:
And via Fimoculous
And there you have it.
Get the ICYMI: Today's Top Stories Newsletter Our daily newsletter delivers quick clicks to keep you in the know
Catch up on the day's news and stay informed with our daily digest of the most popular news, music, food and arts stories in New York, delivered to your inbox.