village voice
RSS/Podcast feed for Village Voice News Status Ain't Hood
Pine-Sol Lookin' Boy
Saints, Sinners, Obsession, and Seduction
Enter to win a Jennifer Jones and Charles Boyer Film Society of Lincoln Center series pass!
Lit Lounge
Enter for complimentary admission to see Power Solo from Denmark with Band Antenna, Sea That Dried Up, and Chem Trail at Lit Lounge!
Rasputin
Enter to win dinner and drinks for two at Rasputin Restaurant and Cabaret!
DeVotchKa
Enter to win tickets to see DeVotchKa on Tuesday, May 20th at Terminal 5!
United Artists
Enter to win a 90th Anniversary United Artists DVD prize package!
Iron & Silk
Enter to win 5 personal training sessions at Iron & Silk Fitness!
People
Pucker Up
In (Partial) Defense of Eliot Spitzer
Is it cheating if it's with a sex worker? Is it preferable to a full-blown affair?
by Tristan Taormino
March 25th, 2008 12:00 AM

When it came to cheating, did Spitzer choose wisely?
Nick Atlas

When news of Eliot Spitzer's link to a prostitution agency first broke, "Why Do Powerful Men Cheat?" stories sprang up all around us, from morning shows to the nightly news. Within the framework of the cheating-husband narrative, no one made the distinction between employing a sex worker and having an affair with a "civilian," except to emphasize that Spitzer cheated and broke the law. I think a distinction should be made about his choice of sex partner. When someone cheats with a civilian, he usually spends more time on courtship than between the sheets: There are text messages, e-mails, phone calls, secret rendezvous, whispered sweet nothings, gifts, even romantic dates. When someone hooks up with a sex worker, while some of those elements may be in play, they are a lot less likely to be part of the equation.

Melissa Gira Grant (melissagira.com), a reporter, sex worker, and sex-workers' rights activist, says: "Some men go to sex workers for closeness and intimacy—they want to cuddle, and that's what they are not getting at home. But for others, it's not emotionally therapeutic at all, it's the same as getting a deep sports massage." In Spitzer's case, according to court documents, his dates seemed pretty businesslike. When he got on the phone, he talked not to "Kristen," the sex worker, but to the agency, and the details of the call were about payment and logistics. According to the transcript, it appears that he may have seen her before, but not regularly, since he needed to be reminded of what she looked like. For the record, Kristen is not the "woman who brought down the governor"—she's simply the one they have on the wiretap. We don't know how often he saw the same escorts or what emotional attachment he had to any of them, but I'm betting Spitzer wasn't into one particular woman, otherwise he would have requested her. This tells me that he wasn't after romantic companionship, but a sexual relationship. To me, his lack of emotional investment (which often accompanies affairs) should soften the blow to Silda Spitzer, although I am pretty sure it hasn't.

I'm not denying that he lied to his family, or that he spent time, money, and energy on other women. I'm not glossing over the irony and hypocrisy of it all, especially considering his hard-charging prostitution prosecutions in the past; it wasn't like he was a big advocate for sex-workers' rights who then got caught with his pants down. However, I think when he chose to have sex with someone other than his spouse, Spitzer chose wisely. People often seek out sex workers as sexual partners precisely because the relationship—and both people's expectations—are clear from the get-go. Successful sex workers, especially high-end escorts, pride themselves on having good work boundaries: They won't call someone late at night or stalk them like a civilian could. They are invested in privacy and discretion, and don't have to be wined, dined, or otherwise manipulated to have sex with you. Marcus has been a sex worker in the Washington, D.C., area for six years; he sees both men and women, and counts a senator—as well as several other high-profile politicians—among his clients. "Privacy and discretion are my highest priority," he told me. He says that a few clients have expressed nervousness over the Spitzer scandal, but it hasn't slowed down business for him.

Sex workers' attitudes about sex, monogamy, and relationships vary wildly. Some make a clear distinction between "work sex" and "non-work sex," rigidly defining both. To some, work sex is a job, an economic exchange, a performance devoid of physical and emotional intimacy; non-work sex is about love, desire, commitment, and physical and emotional intimacy. It's real.

Others draw a distinction between the two, but have a more complex view of work sex versus non-work sex. They allow themselves to enjoy pleasure, experience intimacy, and express themselves authentically during their sex work when possible. Yet they still distinguish their work from the sex they have outside work—while there may be friendship and fun at work, there isn't romance, commitment, or deep intimacy. Says Grant: "For me, sex with clients is very different from sex with people I am in a relationship with. In fact, I had to cut loose a client who was becoming too close and relying too much on me." For others, both the definitions and the lines between sex and work sex are much more nuanced. These folks may be swingers, sexually adventurous, and/or exhibitionists, and for them, their work is ideally (although not always) an extension of their sexuality. One cannot be easily separated from the other.

It seems like Kristen had clear boundaries and harbored no romantic notions about her work—in one of the wiretapped phone calls, discussing her date with Spitzer, she said: "I'm here for a purpose, I know what my purpose is." Rather than continue to criminalize and stigmatize sex work, we need to see sex workers as people performing needed sexual services in our society.

Let's say a husband has desires, fantasies, or kinks that his wife doesn't share. Maybe his sex drive is higher than hers (or maybe hers is higher than his). Instead of feeling bad about themselves, each other, and their relationship, why not agree that he can seek out a sex worker as an additional partner? We need to let go of the fairy-tale notion that spouses will be 100 percent sexually compatible with one another and fulfill all of the other's needs at every stage of their relationship. For some, a relationship where money changes hands can make the boundaries feel very clear and the interactions less threatening for several reasons: Both sex worker and client have distinct roles; there's no romance or dating; it's assumed that the sex worker doesn't have a hidden agenda to break up a client's relationship; and sex workers have experience managing their feelings and the feelings of clients.

Grant says that the majority of her clients are married, and none of their wives know about (or would agree to) their seeing a sex worker. Marcus, however, has clients whose spouses do know, and will sometimes even join them for three-ways. Will there ever come a time when seeing a sex worker will be a viable option for consensual, non-monogamous relationships?

For more about Tristan Taormino, please visit Puckerup.com
More Pucker Up
Behind Jim and Artie Mitchell's Behind the Green Door
Parsing a splendid, lurid memoir of life at S.F.'s O'Farrell Theater

An Expert's Guide to Hand Jobs for Men and Women
Examining the myths, merits, and sparse vocabulary of hand sex

The Queer Heterosexual, Redux
A classic from the Pucker Up vaults

Porn: Now Even More Surreal at the AVN Awards
Bewildering sights, sounds, and truly disheartening Jenna Jameson rants at this year’s Vegas extravaganza

Pucker Up Turns 200!
Celebrating a gala anniversary with a look back at a near decade of debauchery

Add a Comment

Not ? Login as a different user.

All reader comments are subject to our Terms of Use. By submitting a comment, you acknowledge that you have reviewed and agree to these Terms of Use.

Login or Register

Login or register to have a chance to win Free Stuff, subscribe to newsletters and much more!

Login Register
SS on Tue Apr 1, 2008, 16:20, says:
One more benefit of the sex pro for the cheater and spouse: With a sex pro, the cheating is not exposed to the couple's friends and acquaintances. If the cheater finds dates in work or social environs, the cheating is only half of the offense ... the other half is the indiscretion of exposing that spouse to gossip or ridicule. Often the cheated-upon spouse feels much worse when friends, family or co-workers know and lose respect. The sex pro keeps the indiscretion discreet.
SLB on Sun Mar 30, 2008, 15:42, says:
By having sex with multiple, anonymous professionals, isn't he more likely to have exposed his wife to STDs?
Anonymous on Fri Mar 28, 2008, 12:06, says:
Clarifying on my earlier post. Billionaire Ira Riklis, son of junk bond king Meshulam Riklis owns the largest home security company. Holding company Sutherland Capital, name of security firm: COPS. There are laws against stalking -- even more when you happen to be involved in the industry. Wealthy men and powerful politicans are the first to believe laws don't apply to them. Should they not be held to the same level of accountability as the average Joe?

Come on powerful men cheat because they can. Nothing is going to change because of the Spitzer take down.
Anonymous on Fri Mar 28, 2008, 09:35, says:
For a short while in my life I found myself working as a high priced call girl. When I closed that chapter, one wealthy high end client, Ira Riklis, wouldn't leave me alone. He hired someone to find me, then stalked me. Not knowing I was being stalked at the time, I "fell" into a romantic relationship with this married man for many years. This isn't a black and white issue: some Johns fall in love with the girl they see. So, is it cheating even if you pay? I'd say yes.

The Village Voice Ad Index
The Village Voice Summer 2008 Education Supplement

» click here to see more...

The Village Voice Spring Arts Supplement

» click here to see more...