Bush Puts America Under God’s Law
Last week President Bush called on his ever-prayerful cabinet to refocus its attention on shoring up Christian values, as part of his platform for “Communities of Character.” In effect, he took another step in the Christian right’s determined campaign to transform the U.S. into a theocracy. That’s not surprising, since the Christian right is Bush’s most treasured political ally, and he’s got to listen up when they speak.
The main way to support fundamentalist Christians is to protect the institutions of patriarchy. In a Christer world, men carry out instructions from God, and women are men’s docile assistants. Their main job is to have babies, preferably white. Otherwise, they stay in the kitchen, take care of the children, speak when spoken to, and for all intents and purposes remain the property of the husband.
Modern patriarchy depends on the federal government’s reaching down into the bedroom to control the sexual activity of the besieged heterosexual nuclear family. Where, when, and how people have sex remains the organizing principle of society and the single most important domestic political problem of our time. Both Bush and the Congress have been busily addressing the situation by attempting to legislate sexual morality. A few examples:
Abolishing abortion: Bush and his conservative allies are targeting abortion, whittling away at state laws and passing a House bill to give the fetus some of the same legal protections as a human being. They seek to limit research on embryonic stem cells and to ban cloning.
Gay rights: Congress slowly moves toward creating a gulag. Members won points at home by promoting the Defense of Marriage Act, signed by Clinton and requiring the federal government to ignore legal same-sex marriages allowed by a state. Thus a couple considered married in Vermont essentially has to forfeit that status if they move elsewhere. “This was the first time in U.S. history that the federal government adopted a definition of marriage of any kind,” the ACLU notes. “Until now, the federal government has always accepted state definitions of marriage for federal law. DOMA has the effect of treating all lesbian and gay couples as strangers under federal laws.”
Today an even more dangerous measure, a proposed 28th Amendment to the Constitution, would further define marriage as a bond between man and woman (See “The Gay Marriage Bomb,” by Richard Goldstein, July 24). As part of the Constitution, it would cut off court challenges and nullify local statutes that permit unmarried partners of either sex to share health plans, pensions, and hospital visits — right down to the adoption of each other’s kids.
Other congressional measures have banned federal funds from any school district that withholds money for the antigay Boy Scouts. And a House-passed bill would exempt religious charities from state and local antidiscrimination laws.
Abstinence: The administration is pouring $47 million into “abstinence only” sex education programs (See “An Orgy of Abstinence,” Sharon Lerner, July 31). Schools that take part in this crackpot scheme are prohibited from counseling teenagers on birth control, AIDS, and other venereal diseases. Abstinence-only is supported by Washington’s reigning ethicist, Bill Bennett. Bush brother Jeb is putting $1 million of Florida’s money into abstinence.
Tax breaks: Bush has pledged to make the IRS codes friendlier to families, though traditional households already get tax breaks not available to others. Taxes are another way to penalize gay couples by pretending they don’t exist. Under estate-tax rules, for example, a legal heterosexual spouse doesn’t pay any tax on inheritance, but a surviving gay partner pays federal taxes on anything above $675,000. Under the gift-tax regs, a married partner can give his or her spouse a gift tax-free. For gay partners, gifts totaling more than $10,000 a year are taxable. If an employer offers health care benefits, married partners get them tax-free. For gays, health care benefits count as taxable income.
Telecommunications: Congress is falling all over itself to protect children with filters that can censor sex and violence on the Web. One long-standing leader in this is John McCain, who wants to block what he considers indecency from school and library computers. If Congress actually enacts any of this, it will of course be setting up a red-light district on the Internet, something Justice Sandra Day O’Connor supposedly endorses, and establishing a whipping boy for every member of Congress. In addition to cracking down on porn, a surefire way to get votes, they now can rant against pervs on the Net.
One special target here is rap music. Last week, the members of the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee ganged up against the genre. At a hearing on the subject, much was made of a Federal Trade Commission report on explicit content featuring 29 record albums. Twenty-two of those albums were by African Americans, wrote Russell Simmons, chair of the Hip-Hop Summit Action Network, in a New York Times op-ed, yet there was “no one to represent the black rap artists who were clearly being singled out.” Most members of the Senate, he went on to point out, are white, middle-class, and middle-aged.
Drugs: Bush began enforcing a Clinton-era law that denies federal financial aid to college students with even minor drug convictions. Drugs, in the Christian mind, lead to promiscuity, a sin apparently worse than burglary or murder — crimes after which you can still borrow money for school. Before Bush began cracking down, many students ignored a question about drug convictions. Now, if they don’t answer, their aid gets pulled.
Faith-Based Charity: Bush has taken some hits on his plan to let churches run the government’s welfare system, but he pledges to take up the matter again this fall, as he continues his march toward turning the U.S. into a religious state.
UN Officers Accused of Buying Sex Slaves
Our Pimps in Bosnia
The UN as pimp — who could believe it? Yet the evidence mounts. Kathryn Bolkovac, an American cop hired by Texas-based DynCorp, Inc., to stop sex abuse and trafficking in Bosnia, says she was disgusted to discover that UN officers from several countries were themselves frequenting whorehouses and trading in female sex slaves.
The company subsequently fired her for faking time sheets. Bolkovac is suing under a whistle-blower-protection statute in Great Britain. “I was shocked, appalled, and disgusted,” she told the Guardian. “They were supposed to be over there to help, but they were committing crimes themselves. When I told the supervisors, they didn’t want to know.”
This is the second case involving DynCorp. Air mechanic Ben Johnston claims he was canned after discovering evidence of sex slavery and selling arms on the black market. Johnston is also suing.
Bolkovac says a fellow U.S. cop working as a UN police officer in Bosnia bought a girl sex slave for $1000. She has strong backing for her accusations. “There were truly dreadful things going on by UN police officers from a number of countries,” conceded Richard Monk, head of the UN policing operation until 1999. “I found it incredible that I had to set up an internal affairs department to investigate complaints that officers were having sex with minors and prostitutes. The British officers were on the whole extremely good and very professional, setting a great example. But there were policeman from other countries who should not have been in uniform.”
DynCorp wouldn’t comment but had issued an earlier statement saying “The notion that a company such as DynCorp would turn a blind eye to illegal behaviour by our employees is incomprehensible… We encourage our employees to be proactive in reporting inappropriate behaviour and commend those who follow our procedures by reporting it.”
Star Wars: It’s About the Money
“Let’s get real. We all know that if anyone ever attacks America, the bomb is going to be delivered by a suitcase, a car or a truck, or in a boat. It’s not going to come from a missile, because you can track where a missile comes from and retaliate. We all know that we’re lobbying for these programs because they make us money. We don’t care whether they’ll ever work, or even be useful. We care that the dollars come our way.” — An unnamed missile and space division employee at Lockheed Martin, quoted in The Christian Science Monitor
Additional reporting: Ariston-Lizabeth Anderson and Sandra Bisin