Without even the presence of a major Socialist party during its 232-year history to push for such a move, the U.S. officials took a dramatic step toward socialism by announcing that it is considering nationalizing, in effect, the banking system.
Not drawing that conclusion, the N.Y. Times story “U.S. May Take Ownership Stake in Banks” reports:
At the moment, this just looks like yet another major chunk of corporate welfare — at your expense.
Or, it’s a big step toward the kind of nationalization practiced by Saddam Hussein, Fidel Castro, Mao Zedong, Benito Mussolini, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, Ferdinand Marcos, various Saudi Arabian kings, and the Israeli government in 1983 (following a bank crisis).
Or, it’s the Commie pinko enslavement that we so vigorously fought against for decades.
Or, it’s just plain socialism — but because this is taking place under a Republican administration, it’s socialism for rich people first and then probably never for the rest of us.
Take your pick.
Neither Milton Friedman nor Ayn Rand could be reached for comment.
And here’s some other stuff to read . . .
NO PARTICULAR ORDER:
The Age (Australia): ‘Testicles option to embryonic stem cells’
Washington Post: ‘AIG Gets More Government Bailout Cash’
The Age (Australia): ‘Widow sues US over Iraq veteran’s suicide’
Washington Post: ‘FCC Probes Ties Between Military and Pundits’
New York Review of Books: ‘James Baldwin & Barack Obama’
New Yorker: ‘The Debtor’s Dilemma’ (Steve Coll)
New York: ‘Browse 120 Sweaters’