Governor Paterson tried to show he’s listening today by cancelling one bad idea — the tax-payer-financed junket he’d planned to the glitzy World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland.
But the poor guy can’t catch a break: A new poll has his would-be rival, Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, just two points behind him in a potential pimary contest — a big catch-up for Cuomo who was trailing the gov by 23 percent just last month.
The Siena Research Institute survey also found that most New Yorkers dislike Paterson’s nibble taxes — the added levies he seeks on fattening drinks, movie tickets, and music downloads. At the same time, two-thirds of New Yorkers think the governor should ask wealthier taxpayers — those earning $250,000 and above — to shell out more in taxes to help meet the budget crunch.
Overall, respondents still view Paterson favorably — 60-23 percent. But his job performance numbers fell to a 51-45 rating, down from 55-40 last month. Only 32 percent of voters, including 40 percent of Democrats, say they’re ready to elect him in 2010. Thirty-six percent would prefer someone else.
“Governor Paterson has taken a significant hit with voters in the last month and the question is whether this is a blip or the start of a trend,” said Siena’s Steven Greenberg.
The Working Families Party, which has been pushing for a so-called “millionaire’s tax” for months, hailed the new numbers on the tax levies: “Governor Paterson talks about shared sacrifice, but New Yorkers aren’t buying it,” said party honcho Dan Cantor. “Today’s Siena poll confirms what we already knew: there’s a better choice, and most New Yorkers know it.
This article from the Village Voice Archive was posted on January 26, 2009