With the news that Wall Street profits are projected to hit $15 billion this year, it makes sense that the next Mayoral race in New York City will focus on the issue New York’s mega-wealthy (and, if our ‘Mitt Loves N.Y.’ series was any indication, there are a ton of members in this exclusive income club to work with). Bloomberg is getting ready to pass the torch to his successor and, after brushing off his administration from the Occupy saga/legacy, it’s more than apparent that the One Percent is still on everyone’s mind.
“We did that in the state while reducing taxes for the middle class. There’s no reason the city shouldn’t do the same thing if the revenue is necessary. I am not opposed to that at all as long as you make the tax code fairer across the board.”
Advocate Bill DeBlasio has a proposal to raise taxes on those with more than
$500,000 in the bank. Except he added a sentimental rider to smooth it over:
the prerequisite that the revenue generated from this new source of government
income funds pre-K programs for all New York City children. While everyone else
in City Hall let out a resounding “Awww,” it seemed that his proposal
really only pissed off this guy.
As Gothamist reports,
Manhattan Borough President Scott Stringer and City Comptroller John Liu have
both come out to support a similar “millionaire’s tax.” The proposal
reiterated a point Mr. Bloomberg made once in 2008, in which he said that his
friends would never leave NYC because of higher taxes. Since then, the Hozziner
never really followed through with that one. Also, since then, Zuccotti Park
The two real
Gracie Mansion contenders left, City Council Speaker Christine Quinn and former
Public Advocate Bill Thompson, flirted with the idea back in ’09 but have all
since abandoned it completely. Quinn’s opposition is unusual, however, that it
came around the same time her boss and, hopefully for her sake, her biggest
endorser left the idea in the past, too.
It is also
strange that Quinn, the declared frontrunner of the race, has remained
resilient to a measure that a majority of New Yorkers have called for. This
might be simple political maneurvering or, maybe, it’s just too close to call.
As we all know, everything changes once the election bells ring.
Bloomberg’s $2 billion budget cuts clarion call makes headlines, it’s safe
to say that the issue is still in the air. With the high income disparity of
Manhattan and, now, Brooklyn in the background, it’s safe to say that this
‘necessary revenue’ issue – a surtax on the wealth of New York City’s megarich,
regardless of whether the next inheritor of Gotham wants it or not – will be on
the campaign trail as well.