From The Archives

The Raw Power of Bob Dylan’s Pain

In 1975 we called Blood on the Tracks "the excruciating cry of a man who is tormented by his own freedom."

by

Few figures have been as indelibly linked to the Village Voice as Bob Dylan, who we first covered as a fledgling folk prodigy haunting the Village’s coffeehouse scene, and whose portrait graced the final print edition of the paper. Always an enigmatic figure, by 1975 Dylan was harder to pin down than ever. A decade earlier, in the September 2, 1965, issue of the Voice, Jack Newfield reviewed Dylan’s legendary performance at Forest Hills, calling the then-24-year-old singer “America’s most influential poet since Allen Ginsberg.” But by the time Dylan released Blood on the Tracks in 1975, fans could be forgiven for wondering if he’d ever return to the heights of his mid-Sixties output.

Following 1966’s epochal double album Blonde on Blonde, and a mysterious motorcycle crash in Woodstock a month later, Dylan had become something of a recluse, retreating from his perch as Voice of a Generation to pursue a quieter life as a family man. But as Lucian Truscott IV described in a 2016 essay for the Voice, by 1974, as he assembled the material that would make up Blood on the Tracks, Dylan’s marriage was in tatters.

In the February 3, 1975, issue of the Voice, longtime contributor Paul Cowan reviewed the collection, which, he writes, “has more raw power than any of his albums since ‘Blonde on Blonde.’ ” This month, the Dylan camp is releasing the fourteenth installment of his Bootleg Series, More Blood, More Tracks, which offers fans a deep dive into what Cowan called “the excruciating cry of a man who is tormented by his own freedom.”

Bob Dylan’s Pain: Flip Side to Cruelty
By Paul Cowan, February 3, 1975

Bob Dylan has regained his courage. “Blood on the Tracks” has more ray power than any of his albums since “Blonde on Blonde.” It fuses the musical control he began to gain in “John Wesley Harding” and “Nashville Skyline” with lyrics that are so honest you begin to share his torment as soon as you hear them. In songs like “Shelter from the Storm” and “Tangled up in Blue” he is once again exploring his private rage and pain, rather than posting as the contented country squire of “New Morning.” Even his decision to recut the record with unknown Minnesota studio musicians, to rely on the evocative power of his lonely voice, his harmonica and guitar, make you feel, in your pores, that this album comes from his craving to create, not from a willed decision his career required a new album.

The message that comes through the blues, the ballads, the light, lithe country tunes, is a bleak one. At 34, with his marriage on the rocks, he is an isolate, lonely drifter once again.”I’m going out of my mind, with a pain that stops and starts like a corkscrew in my heart.”

He’s still Woody Guthrie’s disciple, but his echoes of Woody’s songs evoke a deliberately desolate counterpoint to his mentor’s exuberant America (and his own past hopes). Woody saw the Grand Coulee Dam as an example of this country’s marvelous capacity to make “green pastures of plenty from the dry desert grounds.” But for Dylan, the dam is no longer an example of benevolent engineering. It is an arid, ominous symbol. “Idiot wind, blowin’ like a circle round skull, from the Grand Coulee Dam to the Capital.” The language and phrasing are Woody’s, but the spent pessimism of the lyric and the tone of voice sounds more like T.S. Eliot. Dylan, trapped in the prison of himself, is Tiresias in his dugs. America is his wasteland. The answer, my friend, is no longer blowing in the wind. Now the idiot wind is blowin’ in a circle round his skull.

In “Blood on the Tracks,” as in all Dylan’s great albums, pain is the flip side of his legendary cruelty. I remember my own anger at him when I first heard his masterpiece of scorn, “Ballad of a Thin Man.” It was released in 1965, when Dylan was still marginally political, when people who would become part of the new left were still trying to decide whether to reach out to America or withdraw from it. That insinuating, derisive refrain — “something is happening and you don’t know what it is, do you, Mr. Jones” — promised to become an anthem for a spoiled generation. Dylan had permitted them to view all the America that lay beyond their tight knots of long-haired dopers as a land of Mr. Joneses, a frieze of naive, contemptible grotesques.

The irony is that his cruelty grew out of his own shyness, which seemed to intensify as he moved from anonymity in Hibbing to celebrity in New York. Before his motorcycle accident, everything he observed was material for a fresh tidal wave of the terrifying images that fill “Desolation Row” and “Memphis Blues Again.” There was always a defensive pained distance between himself and what he saw, a quickness to judge new people and experiences without ever relaxing enough to enjoy them.

Judging from “Blood on the Tracks,” the years he celebrated in “Nashville Skyline” and “New Morning” were somewhat stultifying, a soap bubble of time filled with contrived joy. Now the bubble has burst open. Sometime — probably as his marriage began to shatter — his selfishness must have curdled into self-hatred. You can hear that in the unexpected ending of “Idiot Wind.” The song begins with a put-down that sounds as cruel as “Ballad of a Thin Man” (“you’re an idiot, babe, it’s a wonder that you still know how to breathe”), but suddenly it closes with a forlorn paean to his woman’s “holiness” and “kind of love” and then with the terrible confession that, for the moment, he’s a sort of spiritual paraplegic: “We are idiots, babe. It’s a wonder we can even feed ourselves.”

Even if part of you dislikes the singer, you have to feel unreserved admiration for the unsparing honesty of his songs.

But he can never connect. He’s still too eager to be the Freewheelin’ Bob Dylan or the handsome, mysterious Jack of Hearts (the hero of a nine-minute ballad on “Blood on the Tracks”) to permit any anchors in his life. Think of his songs about his five children. He writes about them once in a awhile — in “Sign in the Window,” for example, where he or a patriarchal persona says he wants “a bunch of kids who’ll call me Pa,” or in “Forever Young” (as mawkish and touching as “My Boy Bill” in Carousel), where he’s conventionally ambitious dad exhorting his young to embody a conventional array of virtues.

But the kids are always objects. He never experiences them as Robbie Robertson, say, experienced his daughter in “A La Glory” — or (to put Dylan in the class where he belongs) as Yeats experienced the prospect of fatherhood in his lovely meditation “Prayer for my Daughter.” And, incredibly, he never sings for his children. All the new songs he’s released since the birth of his first son are filled with intimate details of his love life and his search for God. But there is not a single nonsense playsong like Woody Guthrie’s “Mama, Oh Mama, Come Smell Me Now.” There is not a single lullabye.

I think that Dylan bears a very special kind of curse. He seems unable to establish warm, lasting relationships, but he’s too eager for love to make the cold decision to sacrifice his private life to his art, as Joyce or even Mailer can. “Blood on the Tracks” is a great album because he’s writing into the headwinds of that curse, because songs like “Shelter from the Storm” and “Idiot Wind” are so plainly part of his relentless effort to find salvation.

The entire record is the excruciating cry of a man who is tormented by his own freedom. But it is also filled with religious imagery, with hints that the wounded, weary Dylan sees “Shelter from the Storm” not as a woman’s warm home, but as the peace of God. I think that, like T.S. Eliot, Dylan longs to submit his unruly will to the ceremonies of faith — maybe Orthodox Judaism, maybe formal Christianity. Or maybe — hopefully — some American fusion of those European forms.

For him, perhaps, the faith he is seeking is the only escape from his swirling emotions, the only alternative to madness or suicide.

The Latest