By Keegan Hamilton
By Albert Samaha
By Village Voice staff
By Tessa Stuart
By Albert Samaha
By Steve Weinstein
By Devon Maloney
By Tessa Stuart
Instead, in December 1999, Mauskopf engineered a slam at then schools chancellor Rudy Crew, releasing a report that accused the Board of Education of fixing school attendance figures to inflate state aid. An already wounded target of both Giuliani and Pataki, Crew was forced out shortly thereafter. While the attendance issue was a secondary mandate of the commission from its inception, the Mauskopf report did not contain any specificsidentifying no schools where misconduct had occurred and relying on statistical simulations to make a broad and damning case.
The rationale offered for this unusual ambiguity added to the reports incendiary tonenamely that the commission was at such a particularly significant and sensitive stage, uncovering criminal or potentially criminal acts, that it was extremely limited in what it can reveal publicly at this time. A year and a half later, neither the commission nor any prosecutor has returned to the attendance issue, though Mauskopf is reportedly continuing her investigation.
Harry Spence, a former Crew deputy who has relocated to Massachusetts, told the Voice that Mauskopfs irresponsible assertions in the attendance report so outraged several members of the commission staff that they resigned within a few weeks. Other sources identified two top staffersexecutive director Barbara Billet and research director Ruth Henehanamong those who quit. Reached at home by the Voice, Billet, who is now deputy commissioner of the state tax department, declined to answer questions about her departure. Henehan, who is also with another state agency, did not respond to specific messages.
Stanley Grayson, a former deputy mayor under Ed Koch and one of the three members of the commission, told the Voice that he did not know why Billet left. She called and told me she was resigning, he said. It was rather abrupt.
While the only other commission report featured the name of Billets successor on the title page and listed 37 staff members on the back page, neither Billet nor any other staffer is identified in the attendance report. Ironically, the second reportissued in May 2000faulted the Board of Educations construction planning and recommended that the SCAthe original commission targetbe given greater authority in determining what schools should be renovated or built.
State comptroller Carl McCall, whose office had long been studying attendance reporting, assailed the Mauskopf findings as speculative. A McCall analysis charged that the Moreland estimate of the amount of additional state aid connected to the inflated attendance figures was based only on the hypothetical impact over a five-year period of a hypothetical overstatement of attendance of 2-3 percent. But McCall said the incidents of overreporting do not add up to the assumed percent, nor did the data in the report support such an estimate.
McCall also pointed out that attendance has little to do with determining state aid. It is well known, concluded the comptroller, that the education formulas are annually worked backwards until the politically negotiated share for the city schools is hit in the calculations. In this context, the data feeding into the school aid formulas for New York City is really of no practical consequence whatsoever.
Even Grayson, who was appointed to the commission by Pataki and views Mauskopf as a good, thoughtful lawyer, told the Voice that he believed the commission had gotten sidetracked on what I would call minor issues. He described the attendance report as a dangling participle with no finality, expressing the hope that a conclusive version of it and an SCA study would eventually appear. Grayson said the commission only met four times in the last year and participated in another four conference calls.
McCalls office has also issued an audit sharply critical of Mauskopfs other officethe inspector general. In a 24-page report issued last July, McCall found that half of Mauskopfs investigations were not completed within the time limits set by her office, and that she had abandoned the long-standing practice of issuing annual reports documenting the work of the office. In addition, while prior IGs had included a representative from the comptrollers office in monthly executive meetings and shared information on cases and audits, Mauskopf delayed and hampered McCalls two-year review, denying access to most files.
It makes one wonder exactly what they are afraid of, said McCall. While McCall is a Democrat overseeing a Republican administration, the previous comptroller, Ned Regan, was a Republican overseeing a Democratic administration. Yet the IG and comptroller freely exchanged information in the Cuomo years. A McCall spokesman told the Voice last week that Mauskopf has not been as cooperative as the previous IG, adding that McCall was also disappointed by the sometimes inflammatory claims of the Moreland commission.
New York Post Albany bureau chief Fred Dicker has written that Mauskopf so often socialized with high-ranking Pataki aidesparticularly Mucha, a friend for a decadethat she compromised the independence of her agency. In a 1999 profile of her, The New York Law Journal cited two unnamed sources who criticized Mauskopf as being too close to the officials she is charged with investigating and failing to bring broad-ranging probes aimed at the top levels of government. The U.S. Attorneys office in Brooklyn has convicted three people in a probe of the Pataki parole board and is reportedly still investigating others.